Cates’ take connected to Wray’s testimony today.
Thanks to Moonman62, here is the transcript and audio:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?460435-1/fbi-director-wray-word-spying-describe-surveillance&start=268
Cates:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1125911567734800385.html
Here’s Jeff Carlson .@themarketswork of @EpochTimes setting the record straight after much media mis-reporting of Wray’s testimony today.
FBI Director Cites Ongoing Investigation in Response to Spying Question
FBI Director Christopher Wray testified before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee on May 7, and was asked a series ...
It is being reported by the usual suspects today that Wray DENIED in his testimony there was any spying on the Trump campaign.
This is how grifters get an audience: you don’t watch/read Wray’s testimony yourselves, you listen to people who make false representations about it.
If Jeff walks you through what Wray actually said today and you tell me you ‘don’t buy it’ then real news reporting is just not for you.
Media outlets DELIBERATELY MISREPRESENTED TO YOU what Wray said in his testimony and if you come BITCHING to me or Jeff for correcting the record, it’s clear you’re wasting your time reading us.
Fly, be free!
We’ll be over here ACCURATELY REPORTING/COMMENTING on what actually happened, giving people the real news, not pimping narratives that involved misrepresenting what actually happened.
If you have a problem with that....
From link above:
Contrary to media reporting, Wray did not deny that spying on the Trump campaign occurred
Director Christopher Wray testified before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee on May 7, and was asked a series of questions on the topic of spying and surveillance on the Trump campaign by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.).
Wray’s answers have been widely misrepresented and misreported. Media outlets such as The Washington Post and CNN published headlines claiming that Wray had said there was no evidence of spying on the Trump campaign. There were also multiple claims that Wray had directly refuted statements by Attorney General William Barr.
The problem is, that wasn’t what Wray had actually said. And some of his answers came from questions that had nothing to do with the Trump campaign.
With regard to Wray’s comments on ”spying,” he was actually responding to a question regarding the FBI’s normal operations:
Shaheen: I’d like to follow up on Senator Moran’s question about the hearing we had with Attorney General Barr. Because, I was very concerned by his use of the word “spying” which I think is a very loaded word. It conjures up a criminal connotation. I want to ask you and I’d appreciate a “yes” or “no” answer if possible.
When FBI agents conduct investigations against alleged mobsters, suspected terrorists, other criminals, do you believe that they’re engaging in “spying” when they’re following FBI investigative policies and procedures?
Wray: Well, that’s not the term I would use.
Wray’s comment was immediately seized upon by many in the media and led to claims that the FBI director had testified there was no spying in relation to the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign. Politico even led with the headline, “FBI’s Wray: Spying is ‘not the term I would use’ to describe Trump campaign probe.” Note that Wray was responding to the everyday activities of the FBI, not specifically to the activities surrounding the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign.
There have also been a number of articles published claiming that Wray was publicly taking issue with Barr’s use of the word “spying,” although that is not what Wray said.
Shaheen continued with her questioning and Wray provided an answer that is getting little attention, although it probably should. Wray stated that he was less concerned with what the investigative activity was actually termed and far more concerned with the intent that lay behind the investigations.
Shaheen: I would say that’s a “no” to that question.
Wray: Well, I mean, look, lots of people have different colloquial phrases. I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes. And to me the key question is making sure that it’s done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That’s the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases.
The questioning then shifted more directly to the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign and efforts by the FBI to obtain warrants. Wray noted that there had been “a number” of unspecified warrants issued:
Shaheen: Did FBI Agents get warrants for information as part of their counter-surveillance investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election?
Wray: Well, I want to be a little bit careful about what I can discuss here, but I think it’s been publicly disclosed that there were a number of relevant warrants that were secured in the course of that investigation.
We know that there was at least one FISA warrant on former Trump adviser Carter Page. There may have been others as well. Former Trump adviser George Papadopoulos and former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort have both been mentioned as possibilities.
Shaheen then asked Wray if the FBI spied on the Trump campaign. Wray was very careful in his answer. Note that, despite the many misleading headlines claiming otherwise, this is the only place where Shaheen actually asked directly about spying in relation to the Trump campaign:
Shaheen: And do you believe, Director Wray, that the FBI and its agents spied into the 2016 presidential campaign operation?
Wray: Well, again, I want to be careful about how I answer that question here because there is an ongoing inspector general investigation. I have my own thoughts based on the limited information I’ve seen so far but I don’t think it would be right or appropriate for me to share those at this stage, because I really do think it’s important for everybody to respect the independent inspector general’s investigation, which I think this line of questioning starts to implicate and I think it’s very important for everybody to be able to have full confidence in his review.
Wray confirmed the ongoing FISA investigation being conducted by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz but was careful not to comment on it. Nor did Wray confirm or deny spying on the Trump campaign. Also of note, Wray did not in any way dispute Shaheen’s use of the word “spied.”
Shaheen tried one last time to establish that there had been no illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign. Wray’s answer provided a host of additional headlines:
Shaheen: At this time do you have any evidence that any illegal surveillance into the campaigns or individuals associated with the campaigns by the FBI occurred?
Wray: I don’t think I personally have any evidence of that sort.
Wray’s answer is given greater context in video form, in which it can be seen that Wray paused prior to answering and emphasized the words “I personally,” but the damage was done and the sound bite obtained.
NBC News promptly issued an article titled “FBI chief Wray refutes Barr, says no ‘spying’ on Trump campaign.” The Washington Post published no less than three different articles on Wray’s statements, including one titled “FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign.”
The FBI isn’t investigating itself and Wray hasn’t been tasked with investigating potential FISA abuse or FBI activities during the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign. That matter has been left to IG Horowitz, whose report is currently scheduled to be delivered before the end of June.
The FISA investigation is one of several investigations coming to an end. There is also the matter of the 14 criminal referrals made by special counsel Robert Mueller as an outgrowth of his investigation. Two of these, former Obama White House counsel Greg Craig and Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, are publicly known. The other 12 haven’t been revealed and are fully redacted in the Mueller report.
Barr recently acknowledged that there were a variety of investigations related to the investigations into the Trump campaign, during testimony before a House Appropriations subcommittee, noting, “One of the things I want to do is pull together all the information from the various investigations that have gone on.”
I agree that what Wray said yesterday is being misrepresented in the news media. Shaheens question was framed in such a way to get the sound bite “ that’s not the word I’d use.” She limited the question to only applying to terrorists and criminals and only “ if proper procedures” were followed. Not applying to the opposition political party and when procedures were NOT followed.