Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote; StormFlag; TEXOKIE; CPT Clay; buffaloguy; grey_whiskers; Wingy; bitt; Shady; ...
Vol.#156
04-25-19

Q POSTS HERE

Q seems to have returned to a daily posting pattern, and is posting at a reasonable level. There were just two today, as information is "leaking" out to mainstream media sources and the sleepers become aware.

Let's see what stories the Oracle is following today.

#3324

How the Obama White House Engaged Ukraine to Give Russia Collusion Narrative an Early Boost

how-the-obama-white-house-engaged-ukraine-to-give-russia-collusion
[HUSSEIN]
Q

(linked John Solomon article)

How the Obama White House engaged Ukraine to give Russia collusion narrative an early boost

(excerpts)

As Donald Trump began his meteoric rise to the presidency, the Obama White House summoned Ukrainian authorities to Washington to coordinate ongoing anti-corruption efforts inside Russia’s most critical neighbor.

The January 2016 gathering, confirmed by multiple participants and contemporaneous memos, brought some of Ukraine’s top corruption prosecutors and investigators face to face with members of former President Obama’s National Security Council (NSC), the FBI, State Department and Department of Justice (DOJ).

The agenda suggested the purpose was training and coordination. But Ukrainian participants said it didn’t take long — during the meetings and afterward — to realize the Americans’ objectives included two politically hot investigations: one that touched Vice President Joe Biden’s family and one that involved a lobbying firm linked closely to then-candidate Trump.

Telizhenko, who no longer works for the Ukraine embassy, said U.S. officials volunteered during the meetings — one of which was held in the White House’s Old Executive Office Building — that they had an interest in reviving a closed investigation into payments to U.S. figures from Ukraine’s Russia-backed Party of Regions.

That 2014 investigation was led by the FBI and focused heavily on GOP lobbyist Paul Manafort, whose firm long had been tied to Trump through his partner and Trump pal, Roger Stone.

*snip*

That makes the January 2016 meeting one of the earliest documented efforts to build the now-debunked Trump-Russia collusion narrative and one of the first to involve the Obama administration’s intervention

(much more at link)

Don't let the derps fool you. As Q points out with his sole comment on this post, [HUSSEIN], the 'Russian Hoax' was not solely a Hillary/DNC op, but went all the way to the Obama White House.

Didn't Solomon tell us last week that [HUSSEIN]'s dirty hands would be exposed this week?

upsdriver scooped Q on this story by [DELTA 1:22] and was punished by CIA/TheFacebook for reporting it.

BiggBob commented.

Solomon said he would be dropping proof last week that bozo was in on it early.

Hostage plucked this from the article.

Now we have more concrete evidence that the larger Ukrainian government also was being pressed by the Obama administration to help build the Russia collusion narrative. And that onion is only beginning to be peeled.

But what is already confirmed by Ukrainians looks a lot more like assertive collusion with a foreign power than anything detailed in the Mueller report.

#3325

Why Did Obama Assign "Renegade" as His US Secret Service Codename?

Why would a President of the United States [HUSSEIN] assign 'RENEGADE' as his USSS codename?
Define 'Renegade'.
noun
1. a person who deserts and betrays an organization, country, or set of principles.
synonyms: traitor, defector, deserter, turncoat, betrayer;
adjective: renegade
1. having treacherously changed allegiance.
Q

For clarification purposes, I submit this information in case anybody is as ignorant as I was (just for a second/Google is your friend. Or is it?_

The Oracle asked this.

It was my understanding that the Secret Service assigned Presidential code names without any input from the "client".

Melian was 'maia on the spot' with this response.

The SS pick the letter of the code names and give POTUS and family several choices.

And a quick trip to the information super-highway turned up this info.

Wikipedia/Secret Service Code Name

The United States Secret Service uses code names for U.S. presidents, first ladies, and other prominent persons and locations.

The use of such names was originally for security purposes and dates to a time when sensitive electronic communications were not routinely encrypted; today, the names simply serve for purposes of brevity, clarity, and tradition.

The Secret Service does not choose these names, however. The White House Communications Agency assigns them. WHCA was originally created as the White House Signal Detachment under Franklin Roosevelt.

Q seems to be indicating that, directly after he lays the RUSSIAN HOAX/COUP at the dirty feet of the foriegn President Obama, he wonders why he would select a traitors name upon entering the White House.

I wonder too. Not too much really, I know. Just playing along.

See you in the funny papers.

What will the new day bring. Stay tuned.

We are the Mouth of America.
Not all can hear our voice, but more do every day.
Can you hear us?

Will you join in our crusade?

The adventure continues tomorrow, sportsfans. See ya ‘round the popsicle stand. Same Q time. Same Q channel.


225 posted on 04/26/2019 2:12:45 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: bagster
It occurred to me as I was reading The Oracle that a synonym for, “renegade” might be, “maverick”. ThanQs, bagster!
227 posted on 04/26/2019 2:31:30 AM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

More “evidence” that argues in favor of RR not black hat?

https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/deputy-attorney-general-rod-j-rosenstein-delivers-remarks-armenian-bar-association-s

Excerpt of RR’s talk:

The rule of law is our most important principle. Patriots must always defend the rule of law. Even when it is not in their personal interest, it is always in the national interest. If you find yourself asking, “What will this decision mean for me?” then you probably are not complying with your oath of office.

At my confirmation hearing in March 2017, a Republican Senator asked me to make a commitment. He said: “You’re going to be in charge of this [Russia] investigation. I want you to look me in the eye and tell me that you’ll do it right, that you’ll take it to its conclusion and you’ll report [your results] to the American people.”

I did pledge to do it right and take it to the appropriate conclusion. I did not promise to report all results to the public, because grand jury investigations are ex parte proceedings. It is not our job to render conclusive factual findings. We just decide whether it is appropriate to file criminal charges.

Some critical decisions about the Russia investigation were made before I got there. The previous Administration chose not to publicize the full story about Russian computer hackers and social media trolls, and how they relate to a broader strategy to undermine America. The FBI disclosed classified evidence about the investigation to ranking legislators and their staffers. Someone selectively leaked details to the news media. The FBI Director announced at a congressional hearing that there was a counterintelligence investigation that might result in criminal charges. Then the former FBI Director alleged that the President pressured him to close the investigation, and the President denied that the conversation occurred.

So that happened.

There is a story about firefighters who found a man on a burning bed. When they asked how the fire started, he replied, “I don’t know. It was on fire when I lay down on it.” I know the feeling.


229 posted on 04/26/2019 3:01:24 AM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

To: bagster
[RR] does the Derpdango and lightly tosses Comey and Obama into the wood chipper, while making himself look innocent.

What can I say, bags, but

#NoHomo

Well played, I say unto you again, sir!

234 posted on 04/26/2019 4:53:13 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

two things Bags ....the Left ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS accuses everyone else of exactly that of which they are guilty.

re “Renegade” ....IMHO...Obama was compromised by SOMEBODY (?Russia, ?China? UK?) right out of the gate...and that “somebody” chose him that name....and told him to use it.

FWIW my money in on UK...its just the sort of thing they’d to to the colonials...


252 posted on 04/26/2019 5:57:02 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

To: bagster
Didgya see this one from beyond the trees?


277 posted on 04/26/2019 6:54:15 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

To: Bigg Red

mark


330 posted on 04/26/2019 9:13:19 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Beta Male O'Rourke is a fake Mexican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson