https://twitter.com/Comey
So many answers.
So we are all celebrating the release of the Mueller report and that it completely exonerates POTUS. But here is what has been bothering me:
The report says that NO US PERSON was involved in colluding with the Russians. That seems to exonerate HRC, and all the derps, too. I probably need to go back and listen/read some more, but I didn’t see any comments here about that. Fellow FReeQs, is that what you heard? Didn’t that kind of make you wonder?
another theory....
X22 Report thinks that the Mueller report is full of lies and that Assange will be used to discredit it.
IIRC, the report states explicitly that the DNC emails were NOT leaked to Wikileaks by Seth Rich or ANY US person. What if Assange tells us that they were? That would call into question the entire report, wouldn’t it? Of course, getting one fact wrong doesn’t mean that you got all the facts wrong. But it would certainly beg a lot of questions. And then, of course, the derps would use that to say that it was wrong about exonerating the President. So where do we go from there?
https://twitter.com/Comey
So many answers.
Imo, if we follow the pattern of events so far by the Trump team, then the grabbing of Assange now is no coincidence.
Mueller made his report. In that report are lies. Now Trump has the source that can open that can of worms.
What happens to a federal investigator that publishes lies in an official report?
Sometimes its easier to let people set themselves up for easy prosecution, then roll them on the tougher issues with it.
“The report says that NO US PERSON was involved in colluding with the Russians. That seems to exonerate HRC, and all the derps, too. I probably need to go back and listen/read some more, but I didn’t see any comments here about that.”
Actually it said no US person was involved with colluding with Russian government backed groups (paraphrasing). Could be non government backed groups
Perhaps they were not colluding, which I think is not a crime. Someone certainly DID collude with the Brits and New Zealanders to damage Trump.
Or perhaps “the U.S. persons” committed some other crime, like failing to register as the agent of a foreign power “Podesta persons.
Perhaps the statement was a misdirection intended to put the criminals at ease. (Maybe?)
We wait to see what the IG and Huber have, and what they do with Nunes’ referals.
Seth Rich...I do not know if you want to call the report into question, but we do want to get Seth Rich’s name out there JA sayes he is the source.
I think the “no US person” means “in or connected to the Trump campaign”. REmember there are 12 indictments from the Mueller investigation that are not public, AND not connected to Trump.
So we are all celebrating the release of the Mueller report and that it completely exonerates POTUS. But here is what has been bothering me:
The report says that NO US PERSON was involved in colluding with the Russians. That seems to exonerate HRC, and all the derps, too. I probably need to go back and listen/read some more, but I didn’t see any comments here about that. Fellow FReeQs, is that what you heard? Didn’t that kind of make you wonder?
another theory....
X22 Report thinks that the Mueller report is full of lies and that Assange will be used to discredit it.
IIRC, the report states explicitly that the DNC emails were NOT leaked to Wikileaks by Seth Rich or ANY US person. What if Assange tells us that they were? That would call into question the entire report, wouldn’t it? Of course, getting one fact wrong doesn’t mean that you got all the facts wrong. But it would certainly beg a lot of questions. And then, of course, the derps would use that to say that it was wrong about exonerating the President. So where do we go from there?
Had to go catch up on X22 before posting. That was an interesting theory on Assange may be the one who ends up discrediting the Mueller Report. We got one major obstacle out of the way and that is where it cleared President Trump of any wrongdoing and I am good with that to move on to the next stage.
The only reason to come back and discredit the Mueller Report is maybe Mueller and Rosenstein are still protecting the deep state and they are still protecting anything that came out about the Clintons. We know the report was done over a year ago and AG Barr came along and made them wrap it up. They didn’t get President Trump but they were still able to protect others, perhaps in the redactions.
If Mueller and Rosenstein are still protecting the derps and Assange exposes them, that’s a whole other level of sting operation that may be going on.
CGato
Generally posted:
So we are all celebrating the release of the Mueller report and that it completely exonerates POTUS. But here is what has been bothering me:
The report says that NO US PERSON was involved in colluding with the Russians. That seems to exonerate HRC, and all the derps, too. I probably need to go back and listen/read some more, but I didn’t see any comments here about that. Fellow FReeQs, is that what you heard? Didn’t that kind of make you wonder?
another theory....
X22 Report thinks that the Mueller report is full of lies and that Assange will be used to discredit it.
IIRC, the report states explicitly that the DNC emails were NOT leaked to Wikileaks by Seth Rich or ANY US person. What if Assange tells us that they were? That would call into question the entire report, wouldn’t it? Of course, getting one fact wrong doesn’t mean that you got all the facts wrong. But it would certainly beg a lot of questions. And then, of course, the derps would use that to say that it was wrong about exonerating the President. So where do we go from there?
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1161
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thanks for the post, GEN!
I caught that too.... seems to exonerate Hillary et al. I had not heard those theories. They seem very plausible.
Sitting over here in my vacuum, I puzzled it through this way - and could be completely off base:
As I understand it, it speaks of No US citizen colluded with Russia IN THE 2016 ELECTION CYCLE.
I doubt Mueller has let Hillary off the hook in the report for any and all prior collusions and betrayals - *ahem* UR1 - because I doubt that time period was covered in the report.
During the 2016 election, the Hillary collusions seem to have been mainly with the Ukraine.... not Russia,....and although there were Russian players, they do not seem to have been acting officially for Russia,[but if I tracked it well (which maybe I didn’t)] they seemed to be free agent Russian Derps - and not acting for the Russian government.
With regard to the Trump campaign and "social media".
Note further when the report (Barr) talked about "hacking" the derps, he didn't mention "US persons" but rather just "no evidence" that the Trump campaign colluded.
Watch it again. Nobody "cleared" the derps.
1...Obambi is not a US person
2....I think the NXIVM rollout will ensnare everyone else.
Maybe the Clintons didn’t collude with Russia but some of the Five Eye folks like Australia, UK, etc. So no Russia collusion but in my mind it leaves the door open for others.
Mueller bought the HRC & DNC Kool-Aid thoroughly. You are right, for example, that Mueller stated that the Russians hacked the DNC server; we know that the FBI never took possession of that server.
Don't try to turn pig's-ear Mueller into a silk purse... can't be done. 😁
The emails claim would be a direct lie because as I understand it, it was proven that the recorded transfer rate could not have occurred by other than a hardware interface, i.e. a flash drive.