| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 06/01/2019 2:52:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
counterproductive flamebait |
Posted on 04/10/2019 10:11:03 AM PDT by romanesq
Nicely done, Fatima!
Q, of course, does not look for money. Not that that’s a bad thing ... but no one would even know how to make a donation.
Likewise, anons and FReeQs are not paid. We participate for various reasons which range from a thirst for knowledge to our need for a unifying pro-Trump narrative to pure patriotism.
Yet ... all these grifters show up ... and apparently they have found they can get (derp) funds if they bash Q and the (((WWG1WGA))) movement.
It’s really disgusting.
Thanks for exposing this one.
The big difference being that the independent investigation into the source of the mysterious light that appeared to shoot up into the night sky on a time lapsed weather camera took place weeks BEFORE the brain trust at Q-anon got hold of it.
The scientists and photography experts discussed the anomalous image, chased down leads, called civil and military aviation in the area, and generally worked in concert to resolve the mystery. It took them less than 72 hours to fully understand and document what had happened.
Complete report Comprehensive analysis of the Whidbey Island 'missile'
The drama around this event didn't start until weeks later when some internet joker posted the image and "hinted" it was a missile aimed at AF1. No evidence was ever presented by the "Q team" to support this nonsensical claim, no follow up has been done by them to identify who launched this missile, and outside a couple of weeks of wildly inaccurate rumor and speculation the incident was never mentioned again.
So to correct you analogy, its the original investigation that determined the image was created by a passing helicopter which is analogous to the Shroud of Turin and folks like you who are the 'autofellatory atheists' tasked with trying to debunk it.
Yawns.
This is four long exposure images of several different rotor aircraft
And here is your alleged "helicopter" Let's see if you can figure out what's missing from your alleged rotor aircraft picture. Could it be maybe the rotor? LOL
Just stop you are embarrassing yourself
“You should rephrase. Maybe something like, “It wasn’t reported that anybody saw the missile launch”.”
Did anyone report seeing a helicopter shining a search light? We know for a fact that SOMETHING was there and have pictorial proof of it. For the derps claim it wasn’t a missle because nobody saw it to be true, then it also wasn’t a helicopter search light because nobody saw that either. Can’t have it both ways.
A lack of intellectual curiosity seems requisite for a belief in Q-anon.
Thank you.
More
The MAGA Coalition needs to explain to the PEOPLE THAT TRUSTED IT WITH THEIR MONEY how they ended up handing $60,000 of it to a known con man out of prison less than year who suddenly waves a magic wand and has an event planning company.
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1042573436885905408
You seemed enamored with pseudo-science...good luck with that.
Your A-game isn't even enough to get a rise out of me.
Oh, and next time? Make sure the electric mixer isn't running when you try to lick the beaters.
Says the troll the doesn’t have the intellectual honesty
To admit it isn’t a helicopter
Define projection
Lol yeah show me another picture of a flashlight and pretend it’s like a helicopter
Pseudo science
Bwhahahahahahaha
The above post is from Sept. 2018.
Projection is what the light on the helicopter was doing.
See how it all works out? See?
(Raises eyebrows while waggling head, murmurs, "Current year.")
Mac
The problem is you don’t speak the language of Q-world.
You don’t start off discussions by screaming TROLL!
Follow by a series of ad hominem attacks.
Then a series Internet images that can’t be properly sourced.
Ending with screams of “Don’t argue with me! Get out of my sandbox or I’ll tell mommy aka Jim Robinson!”.
How many will ever make it out?
- Radar data of a helicopter in that location, at that time.
- Confirmation from the crew that flew the route.
- An image that matches the light trails left by the moving boats in the same video, which is consistent with what one would expect from a long exposure shot of a vehicle with multiple lights.
- Basic photography knowledge that moving objects generally disappear on long exposures, confirmed by the boats in the video.
Evidence that supports a missile:
- It looks like a missile
Sorry I missed this comment earlier I would have proven you wrong much sooner...
Because Nothing Happened
785 posted on 4/12/2019, 8:16:16 PM by mac_truck
http://mynorthwest.com/1018856/whidbey-island-photo-missile/?
http://www.whidbeynewstimes.com/news/curious-photo-fueling-speculation/
https://sputniknews.com/us/201806121065349803-pentagon-denies-knowledge-mystery-object-west/
This one is my favorite
Q NEWS, get it?
E pur si muove.
Well its nice to see someone finally get up off their hindquarters and do some looking.
Now have you bothered to READ those news reports?
/lolz
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.