This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 06/01/2019 2:52:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
counterproductive flamebait |
Posted on 04/10/2019 10:11:03 AM PDT by romanesq
The funniest ones are the ones that claim to have known all along, as the plan comes together.
Those ones crack me up the most.
“You guys will say ANYTHING.”
If by “anything” you mean “true facts that demonstrate Q is a fraud”, then yes.
“And I bet if I showed you the bajilionty other “Q proofs” you do the same kinda watusi dance to explain how they are all, each and every one of them FAKE FAKE FAKE.”
Well, yeah, I mean, Q is a demonstrated fraud, so obviously whatever you believe are “proofs” are going to turn out to be junk and nonsense. That’s elementary.
And you can say that without looking at a single one, much less the bajillionty ones that are out there.
There's a flaw in your intellect, sir.
What's elementary is that you dismiss proof of a truth without ever having looked at those proofs.
That is the thought process of a small child, not a civilized man.
You may be beyond redemption. But we will be here to coddle you when you finally realize the truth.
“That would only prove that you have no desire to look at any evidence that goes against your cult-like Salem witch trial aversion to facts.”
I have no desire to watch videos put out by people advocating something that is already amply demonstrated to be a hoax and a fraud. At best it might be mildly amusing to see how wrong they are, but really, why bother?
“so adamant that something like Q could even be possible”
It’s not that it’s not possible, it’s just that it isn’t true, and has been demonstrated over and over again to be untrue.
I don’t care about the furniture, that isn’t even relevant.
“And you can say that without looking at a single one, much less the bajillionty ones that are out there.
There’s a flaw in your intellect, sir.”
The only flaw is that you are assuming I’ve never looked at these so-called “proofs” before. Of course I have, and I have always found them to be laughable and easily demonstrated to be false. Besides which, the fact that Q is fraudulent has already been proven, so it is impossible to come up with some “proof” that he isn’t. The two notions are contrary and can’t co-exist, and since one is already proven, the other is an impossibility.
Ever notice they never bring up stuff like how we knew Lisa page had been to London before the trump investigation started and we were told that over a year ago while, they found it out is January when Lisa pages testimony was released?
They have to pretend proof doesn’t exist to protect their sad egos
Yes the fact that the furniture on AF1 hasn’t been moved since the Clinton administration cause it’s bolted down to prevent it moving around in flight is irrelevant to why pictures inside AF1 from different years and even decades look similar
Hahahahahahaha
Try again
Who said anything about watching videos. I don't watch videos of Q "interpreters".
I go right to the source. The Q posts.
If you have half a brain, and I do, you can get all you need from the Q posts themselves, without some internet jagoff trying to explain it for you.
It's all pretty cut and dried, actually, once you understand the comms.
But maybe you don't have half a brain? You already think you need to "watch videos" to understand Q, so who knows?
...and has been demonstrated over and over again to be untrue.
No. Not even once. If it had, I wouldn't subscribe to Trump's Q program. I am not an unreasonable man, after all.
Are you?
No they didnt
And Bagster showed you above
The five stages of grief
1. Denial and isolation;
2. Anger;
3. Bargaining;
4. Depression;
5. Acceptance.
You are at #1
RomanisntQ is at #2
LOL!
We need to set up the 5 stages of panic because that’s what we’re really facing here on this thread from the Q attackers (who are on the same page as the enemy media, FWIW).
CGato
Now that's a completely ignorant statement and also a lie. If you had looked at ALL the proofs or even a certain percentage, you would have no choice but to believe. The proof is overwhelming and staggering.
It's mathematically impossible for so many "coincidences" to take place.
No. You haven't looked at them. If you had, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Where did you look at them? Videos? Ha.
C'mon, man. And Q has NEVER been disproven, so you can stop with that particular canard.
Saying a thing over and over doesn't make it true. But I have proofs. You have nothing but your "feelings" and some derp state/CIA inspired plants and shills.
No. They knew it all along. Don't you understand?
They're way smarter than us. We're just a bunch of dumb cultists.
Don’t need your creepy Q website or your fabricating “cliff notes.”
You’re now adding to your filler of inaccuracies about a small PAC that hired both Gorka and Gov. Palin for one time events a guy who is a Never Trumper and big Sessions supporter who also fell for the QAnon stink.
Being paid for a one-time event even a political one like Gorka and Palin is not a crime, nor a grift no matter how many times you say it with zero evidence. This is America. People can hold political events and do.
Do you even know who your pal Brian Cates is? He joined the Qult and attacked MAGA Coalition and so they looked at him. He’s painfully detailed in a video they made recently and I’ll find it if you dare to see who one of your fellow heroes are.
Cates puts together “bukkake” clips of women who are assaulted by multiple men ejaculating on their faces. He lives with his brother and makes a living by delivering newspapers. He has a paper route and weighs about 400 pounds so he uses his brother’s car to deliver the newspapers.
If you had a clue, you’d almost be dangerous. You only outed yourself and the people you clownishly bow to without any clue whatsoever. Take a bow! (Squirt! Squirt!)
“Besides which, the fact that Q is fraudulent has already been proven, so it is impossible to come up with some proof that he isnt.”
Some of these folks are so deluded, they literally ignore all relevant evidence but think you are ignorant and a shill if you don’t fall for their “evidence.”
I’ve had better discussions with communists and Scientology members. They all argue their positions with about the same level of thoughtfulness. No matter how many facts you cite, they’ll ignore it and return right back to their “material.”
They’ve done this through the entire thread. Sad.
LOL. An unnamed source from Fake News says that Gorka was fired.
You make my point, exactly.
"Naivete" is not attractive look on you bagman.
“If you had looked at ALL the proofs or even a certain percentage, you would have no choice but to believe.”
Sorry, but that is just the statement of a hardcore fanatic, and not someone with a shred of critical thinking. It’s a pretty good demonstration of the type of mentality it takes to still believe in the ridiculous fraud that is Q, though.
That says q said Muller and Trump were working together
Now seeing as you'll falsely claim you already did post it you should have no trouble posting it here again for those the just joined us and may not yet realized how full of crap you are..
Meanwhile I have no problem reposting that q called you a liar just yesterday
If we are merely a LARP asking questions on the Chans, why are we being attacked daily by some
of the world's biggest media co's, social media
co's deliberately applying censorship/banning,
shills paid/inserted to disrupt (media
matters), blue checkmark coordinated attacks, etc.?
All for a 'conspiracy' on the Chans?
All for a 'LARP'?
Why is there a constant flow of disinformation
being pushed re: Q?
Disinformation push re: Mueller is a white hat.
FAKE & FALSE narrative.
Think BLOCKADE.
When you can't attack the information directly,
you attack the source, if that fails, you
'create false misleading information' to
discredit knowing 'select' 'unaware' followers
would not take the time to self-corroborate the
claims (same vehicle/tactics used by FAKE NEWS
media).
Logical thinking always wins.
Nothing can stop what is coming.
As the target(s) turn to the other side, the
attacks will intensify.
We have the source.
Q
Ps the "source"
Referenced above is Julian assange
From drop 1708
JA.
Why does the UK gov desperately want JA?
Think source files.
The more you know.
Q
No it hasn't. Only the Q-attack site you a cheerleader and pimping for makes those claims. That's all you have and you have proven nothing. Researchers have found maga coalition to be suspect. Even President Trump and his Q team called them out.
Last night I did some pondering as to why they did and then it hit me, the streisand effect. That makes perfect sense as to why maga coalition and the enemy media is on the same attack-Q page.
The enemy media has been on the attack-Q agenda for some time but they can't risk going on a full assault because of the streisand effect.They would then risk the unintended consequences of red-pilling more Americans to the corruption going on in the District of Caligula and the corrupt political/corporate culture it has spawned.
It's really quite simple and makes perfect sense to why the President and his Q team called out maga coalition; the derps have to use fake maga sites like maga coalition to be their attack dogs because the enemy media can't afford to go out on a full assault because of the streisand effect (would also possibly explain why a couple of researchers suspected it being a money laundering site).
The Q team is also correct, the more they panic, the more they will attack. The Q team is setting up the shills and those who ignorantly follow them.
Have a nice day, LOL
CGato
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.