[bagster]

The only flaw is that you are assuming I’ve never looked at these so-called “proofs” before. Of course I have, and I have always found them to be laughable and easily demonstrated to be false.

Now that's a completely ignorant statement and also a lie. If you had looked at ALL the proofs or even a certain percentage, you would have no choice but to believe. The proof is overwhelming and staggering.

It's mathematically impossible for so many "coincidences" to take place.

No. You haven't looked at them. If you had, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Where did you look at them? Videos? Ha.

C'mon, man. And Q has NEVER been disproven, so you can stop with that particular canard.

Saying a thing over and over doesn't make it true. But I have proofs. You have nothing but your "feelings" and some derp state/CIA inspired plants and shills.

[Boogieman]

“If you had looked at ALL the proofs or even a certain percentage, you would have no choice but to believe.”

Sorry, but that is just the statement of a hardcore fanatic, and not someone with a shred of critical thinking. It’s a pretty good demonstration of the type of mentality it takes to still believe in the ridiculous fraud that is Q, though.