And you can say that without looking at a single one, much less the bajillionty ones that are out there.
There's a flaw in your intellect, sir.
What's elementary is that you dismiss proof of a truth without ever having looked at those proofs.
That is the thought process of a small child, not a civilized man.
You may be beyond redemption. But we will be here to coddle you when you finally realize the truth.
“And you can say that without looking at a single one, much less the bajillionty ones that are out there.
There’s a flaw in your intellect, sir.”
The only flaw is that you are assuming I’ve never looked at these so-called “proofs” before. Of course I have, and I have always found them to be laughable and easily demonstrated to be false. Besides which, the fact that Q is fraudulent has already been proven, so it is impossible to come up with some “proof” that he isn’t. The two notions are contrary and can’t co-exist, and since one is already proven, the other is an impossibility.
Ever notice they never bring up stuff like how we knew Lisa page had been to London before the trump investigation started and we were told that over a year ago while, they found it out is January when Lisa pages testimony was released?
They have to pretend proof doesn’t exist to protect their sad egos