Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

“And you can say that without looking at a single one, much less the bajillionty ones that are out there.

There’s a flaw in your intellect, sir.”

The only flaw is that you are assuming I’ve never looked at these so-called “proofs” before. Of course I have, and I have always found them to be laughable and easily demonstrated to be false. Besides which, the fact that Q is fraudulent has already been proven, so it is impossible to come up with some “proof” that he isn’t. The two notions are contrary and can’t co-exist, and since one is already proven, the other is an impossibility.


646 posted on 04/12/2019 9:40:40 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
The only flaw is that you are assuming I’ve never looked at these so-called “proofs” before. Of course I have, and I have always found them to be laughable and easily demonstrated to be false.

Now that's a completely ignorant statement and also a lie. If you had looked at ALL the proofs or even a certain percentage, you would have no choice but to believe. The proof is overwhelming and staggering.

It's mathematically impossible for so many "coincidences" to take place.

No. You haven't looked at them. If you had, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Where did you look at them? Videos? Ha.

C'mon, man. And Q has NEVER been disproven, so you can stop with that particular canard.

Saying a thing over and over doesn't make it true. But I have proofs. You have nothing but your "feelings" and some derp state/CIA inspired plants and shills.


651 posted on 04/12/2019 9:53:35 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

“Besides which, the fact that Q is fraudulent has already been proven, so it is impossible to come up with some “proof” that he isn’t.”

Some of these folks are so deluded, they literally ignore all relevant evidence but think you are ignorant and a shill if you don’t fall for their “evidence.”

I’ve had better discussions with communists and Scientology members. They all argue their positions with about the same level of thoughtfulness. No matter how many facts you cite, they’ll ignore it and return right back to their “material.”

They’ve done this through the entire thread. Sad.


655 posted on 04/12/2019 10:02:27 AM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson