“And you can say that without looking at a single one, much less the bajillionty ones that are out there.
There’s a flaw in your intellect, sir.”
The only flaw is that you are assuming I’ve never looked at these so-called “proofs” before. Of course I have, and I have always found them to be laughable and easily demonstrated to be false. Besides which, the fact that Q is fraudulent has already been proven, so it is impossible to come up with some “proof” that he isn’t. The two notions are contrary and can’t co-exist, and since one is already proven, the other is an impossibility.
Now that's a completely ignorant statement and also a lie. If you had looked at ALL the proofs or even a certain percentage, you would have no choice but to believe. The proof is overwhelming and staggering.
It's mathematically impossible for so many "coincidences" to take place.
No. You haven't looked at them. If you had, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Where did you look at them? Videos? Ha.
C'mon, man. And Q has NEVER been disproven, so you can stop with that particular canard.
Saying a thing over and over doesn't make it true. But I have proofs. You have nothing but your "feelings" and some derp state/CIA inspired plants and shills.

“Besides which, the fact that Q is fraudulent has already been proven, so it is impossible to come up with some proof that he isnt.”
Some of these folks are so deluded, they literally ignore all relevant evidence but think you are ignorant and a shill if you don’t fall for their “evidence.”
I’ve had better discussions with communists and Scientology members. They all argue their positions with about the same level of thoughtfulness. No matter how many facts you cite, they’ll ignore it and return right back to their “material.”
They’ve done this through the entire thread. Sad.