A Weekly Dose of President Trump - Trump Family Train 3/28/19 to 4/12/19

FRiends and Deplorable | March 28, 2019 | DollyCali

[DollyCali]

THE WEEK THAT Was
THE GOOD, THE BAD
THE UGLY

GOOD ~ ISIS is gone

VERY GOOD ~ MICHIGAN Rally tonight

BAD ~ Bombings in Israel

CURIOUS ~ Jussie walks

UGLY ~ Left rejects Collusion exoneration report~

FRUSTRATING ~The Media is still breathing, operating & lyin'

EYE ROLL ~ AOC is “the boss”

Welcome all you Deplorables to this week's edition of the Dose!
This is EVERYTHING TRUMP.
Administration, family, frustrations, joys, winning!
We welcome your research, your commentary,
your personal OT sharing and your presence.
Even if you do not share a lot, just check in and say hi.
Lurkers are welcome to become posters!


GOOD PEOPLE/THINGS this week

BAD people/things this week

RALLY TONIGHT
MORE INFO AT POST #1

Keep the Truth coming Mr. President
Keep on Tweeting!

[STARLIT]

On another path right now..feel free to investigate and post. much appreciate.

[pax_et_bonum]

Thanks for posting!

[Lakeside Granny]

Sit back and enjoy!

Charles V Payne ‏Verified account @cvpayne

20m20 minutes ago

Biden under more pressure...is this a political hit job? @FordOConnell says heck yes and its an inside hit job by the Woke crowd in the democrat party.

David Webb ‏Verified account @davidwebbshow

13m13 minutes ago

Let @TheDemocrats eat each other.

The @GOP should stay out of it.

[STARLIT]

https://bongino.com/hannity-sources-say-extraordinarily-damning-info-coming-out-soon-on-doj-fbi/

Talk radio and Fox News host Sean Hannity says his sources told him “extraordinarily damning” information on the Department of Justice and FBI will be released soon.
Speaking to Congressman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday on Hannity, the host said, “There are going to be criminal referrals issued this week by Chairman Nunes. There are going to be — the president, I interviewed last week — there will be the FISA applications released. There will be [FBI] 302s released, [and] there will be Gang of Eight material. We’ve identified five buckets of information that will be extraordinarily damning. I know that to be the case, based on all of my sources.”

Both Hannity and House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., have talked for months about fighting for the release of several “buckets”of information related to potential misconduct of federal officials.

Nunes says he is prepared to submit a criminal referral this week after President Trump said Wednesday he plans to release the unredacted Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants made during the early stages of the Russia investigation.

[pax_et_bonum]

Yes, and their mental disorder stopped being cute a long time ago.

Lol! I’m tired today and a little grumpy!!

;-)

[pax_et_bonum]

I hope Hannity and Nunez are right about those buckets.

I want one of these soon!:

[STARLIT]

Undercover Huber

🚨“In evidence before the FISA Court, the DOJ also revealed that the Russians previewed the release of this information [“dirt” in the form of “thousands of emails”] to Mr. @GeorgePapa19 at that time [April 2016

That sounds a lot like @RepAdamSchiff is saying **DOJ/FBI named Mifsud in a FISA** -

—either as part of the one on @carterwpage OR

—a new one against @GeorgePapa19

And said not only were emails mentioned by Mifsud - but how they’d be released ahead of time - I.e Wikileaks

Thats a bombshell if true, as Mueller has never alleged anything of the sort in any court filing.

I can’t see it in the Page FISA

So has Schiff unintentionally revealed classified information? Is that information even true? Or was the FISA Court misled, again? 🤔

Source: Little noticed March 2018 note from the then HPSCI Minority:

Source: Little noticed March 2018 note from the then HPSCI Minority: https://t.co/f1C6Xbxioy (Page 4)— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) April 3, 2019

IMHO It's Schiff being Schiffty. Consider that passage in light of his misleading minority memo. https://t.co/GDFKr2yJj1— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) April 3, 2019

Tracybeanz ‏ ........ I’ve got more. Stay tuned. My goodness this thing is incredible.

[Lakeside Granny]

Adam Schiff ‏Verified account @RepAdamSchiff

Congress has asked for the entire Mueller report, and underlying evidence, by April 2. That deadline stands.

In the meantime, Barr should seek court approval (just like in Watergate) to allow the release of grand jury material.

Redactions are unacceptable.

Kimberley Strassel ‏Verified account @KimStrassel

Kimberley Strassel Retweeted Adam Schiff

1) The latest example of how irresponsible @RepAdamSchiff and his tweets are. The case here is Haldeman v. Sirica (1974) decided by DC Circuit. The left is jumping all over this, claiming it is basis for why Barr should have to disclose to Congress secret grand jury proceedings.

2)What Schiff & Co. don't mention is this case is to do with a grand jury "report." Under the law, grand juries "may" choose to produce a report for the court. These reports are highly procedurally regulated.

3) They are designed to allow jury to provide findings of "noncriminal" misconduct by an "appointed public officer." Any person named had to have had an opportunity to testify in front of grand jury, as well as witnesses on his/her behalf.

4) Each person named is also given 30 days to respond to any allegation in the report, before it can be filed as public record, or subject to a subpoena. These reports are often written to become public, as they bear on some investigation into gov employee misconduct.

5) the case in 1974 dealt with some grand jury findings about Nixon officials. The complex rules were followed. the report, after some legal wrangling, was then turned over to a specific House impeachment inquiry.

6) None of this bears remotest relation to what Dems are demanding from Barr. They want raw grand jury testimony/evidence, including that related to criminal inquiries into elected officials.

7) this grand jury testimony/evidence meanwhile undoubtedly relates to folks who never testified themselves, or presented witnesses, or have seen findings/results and had opportunity to respond.

It is universes apart. And our public officials ought to be expected to be a little bit more honest about history, and their unprecedented demand to see secret grand jury proceedings

[Albion Wilde]

Today’s AMERICA Prayer Vigil: join in!

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3739463/posts

[Lakeside Granny]

Grumpy is good!

[STARLIT]

I'm thinking Adam fell into a TRAP!!

[jennychase]

>>>Luis Gutierrez: ‘There Should Be Welcoming Centers All Across America’ for Migrants

Convert Customs to Welcome department. Open Airports and ports also.

[pax_et_bonum]

Hey! You’re right!

Grumpy can be fun!

[pax_et_bonum]

That’s hilarious, NIKK!

[pax_et_bonum]

We should welcome these invaders just like President Trump was welcomed in D.C.

[Lakeside Granny]

Agree!

TheSharpEdge ‏ @TheSharpEdge1

1h1 hour ago

Reminder to Schiff, Nadler, and all those using this political theater of a subpoena for the unredacted Mueller report.

BARR WILL NOT BE BULLIED.

[STARLIT]

.10mThe post-cloture change today in the Senate is NOT a rules change. This is a PRECEDENT change. The Senate does conducts much of its business via precedent. And it is a lot easier in the Senate to establish a new precedent…than to alter the Senate rules.
******
.11m..All Democrats voted yes..to sustain the ruling & maintain the 30 hr standard. 2 Republicans voted against trimming the time to two hours.

They were Sens. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Susan Collins (R-ME).
****
.11m..The Senate voted 51-48 to change the Senate standard to speed up confirmation of nominees. The chair ruled that up to 30 hrs of debate were permitted. GOPers appealed the ruling, saying it should be 2 hrs.
In other words, the GOP needed the NAYS to prevail to overcome rhe chair

****
.12m..Senate votes to accelerate the process to confirm some of Trump’s lower-level nominees. The vote overturns Senate tradition that permits 30 hrs of debate after ending a filibuster on some nominees. The new provision permits only 2 hours of debate before taking a confirmation vote

****
.13m..McConnell made a pt of order that it’s 2 hrs of debate available after invoking cloture on lower tier nominees. From the chair, Cotton said no. It’s 30 hrs. McConnell appealed the ruling. So the GOP will vote no, hoping to overrule the chair & establish a new precedent

*****
.44m..The GOP plan is to allow only two hours of debate..before a confirmation vote..on lower-tier nominees..rather than the current standard of 30 hours...AFTER the Senate has broken a filibuster.
*****
.45m.The Senate is now voting to establish a new precedent (not a rules change) to accelerate the confirmation of lower-level nominees. This vote needs a simple majority and needs the NOES to prevail in order for the GOP to get their way.

[pax_et_bonum]

Thanks for posting a link to the prayer thread, Albion!

[jennychase]

Jack Posobiec
@JackPosobiec

#Breaking Rand Paul and Ocasio-Cortez to pen bipartisan letter to President Trump supporting ths withdrawal of US troops from Syria after the collapse of the ISIS Caliphate

[jennychase]

Chuck Ross
@ChuckRossDC

Democracy Integrity Project’s 2017 tax filings show the group paid:
-$3.3 million to Fusion GPS
-$250k to Chris Steele
-$150k to Istok Associates
-$130k to Edward Baumgarter.

Provided research and analysis to “government entities.” https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/01/fusion-gps-steele-soros-millions/ … @dailycaller