Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The SJW culture is far more puritanical and censorious than the American pre-counterculture ever was.
1 posted on 03/12/2019 2:15:18 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Borges

What is with all the recent articles Millennial bashing?


2 posted on 03/12/2019 2:19:22 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

I would bet it would sell as a video game.
Please tell me there’s not a Lolita app already?


4 posted on 03/12/2019 2:24:24 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

If it was a story about an older man and an underage male, it would not only get published, they’d make a movie and it would get the oscar.


7 posted on 03/12/2019 2:26:52 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

We, as a society, simultaneously suppress depictions of sexuality while telling ourselves how enlightened we have become, as ‘shacking up’ becomes the norm, hardly anybody gets married, and ‘hooking up’ is a euphemism for casual sex.

Were we better off being less offended and more inhibited personally?


16 posted on 03/12/2019 2:36:33 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges; Gamecock; SaveFerris; PROCON; Yaelle
I'm a bit confused. I thought "Nabokov" was a chess master. What country was he from again?


19 posted on 03/12/2019 2:37:59 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

I think John Mortimer, who most of us know as the author of Rumpole, fought for the publication of Lolita as well as Lady Chatterley’s Lover.


22 posted on 03/12/2019 2:45:40 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

Lolita is an awful story, and it certainly should not be on the required reading list for high school students. It has no redeeming value that I can discern; I found the book quite sickening and I felt rather dirty. I am definitely not the better for having had to read it.


30 posted on 03/12/2019 2:55:29 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

I realize this is satire, but the current crop of students can’t interpret ants at a picnic without seeing everything through a distorted ideological lens comprised of platitudes, fallacies, and outright lies.

Nabokov is too difficult for them.

While Lolita is well known, it isn’t all Nabokov wrote.

My favorite is Speak Memory.


32 posted on 03/12/2019 2:58:38 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
The SJW culture is far more puritanical and censorious than the American pre-counterculture ever was.

The book had been banned for a time in Britain and France and other countries.

It was originally rejected by all major US publishers and had to be published by a French house that specialized in erotica.

Lolita was only allowed in America because of the "Howl" trial a few years before caused censorship to crumble.

So no, we aren't that different from how things were back then.

38 posted on 03/12/2019 3:16:16 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

I agree, although I thought Lolita was one of the creepiest books I ever read...I thought Humbert Humbert was a truly nauseating character, and I do remember that, not unsurprisingly, this book gave license to all the elderly lit teachers in the world to come onto their female students.

So while I think millennials may be a lnutty in some ways, this time I agree with them.


44 posted on 03/12/2019 3:26:43 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

I have never heard of this novel before. But I have to wonder if the Japanese Lolita culture, which has some following here, is related. Lolitas are women who dress like extremely frilly little girls. Kind of disturbing, IMO.


49 posted on 03/12/2019 3:42:57 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

Lolita was trash when I went to school. Nothing has changed that

No I’m not a millienial


50 posted on 03/12/2019 3:45:53 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

I loved Lolita. But I don’t expect it to even be in libraries any more. But Lolita is nothing compared to Gone with the Wind, which I just finished. That book had better hide itself. The SJW people will not like what they see in that book. Darky is one of the kinder terms.


52 posted on 03/12/2019 4:04:16 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

A book and movie I have never seen, although I have it on DVD. But I did read CANDY! Never saw the movie either.


61 posted on 03/12/2019 6:46:29 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson