Posted on 02/06/2019 9:57:28 PM PST by ransomnote
Like I’ve always said:
We should have blown them off the map on Sept 12th, 2001.
Several thousand rounds usually means a few buckets of 22lr. Pistol shooters do go through 3,000 to 5,000 per week during the competitive season so having a few thousand in many areas is not a big deal.
I think it is very important for the Democrats to press forward with their Green New Deal. It would be great for the so-called Carbon Footprint to permanently eliminate all Planes, Cars, Cows, Oil, Gas & the Military - even if no other country would do the same. Brilliant! Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2019
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ROFL!!!
Trying to figure out these sequences of events,days vs. hours etc..
Trying to go backwards i.e. 30 days ago, etc., I was thinking maybe 90 days ago would be when “Goodbye Mr. Rosenstein” appeared the 2nd time - but that was back in September 2018.
How about:
[-30] (in thirty hours i.e. Monday)
-Blockade removal [’Scaramucci’ model]
[-45] (Mon / Tues ?)
-[RR] removal [Goodbye #2 [#1 _ oversight of Mueller]
[-60] (Tues / Wed?)
-[Ohr] removal
[-90] (Wed / Thurs)
-[1-4] removal
Then Barr is confirmed and DECLAS begins ... ?
Hours or days?
Speaking of Twitter, my account survived the Great Purge of QAnon accounts!
Whew.
Interesting countdown clock
Each T-[_] is not a literal time, rather an initiating of events according to the plan. T-9 hours initiate a sequence of events in preparation, it doesn't mean it is an exact 9 hours to launch.
Q is telling us what stage of the plan we are in T-30?— [intheMatrixxx] (@intheMatrixxx) February 10, 2019
isnt 9 is kinda young to be chewing tobacco ????????????????!!!!!!
Not in 1965 in tobacco country!
(Discovered it on a search for "Scaramucci"...)
I note "-Red/Green Castle per orig plan" (USACOE to build the Wall!)
TXnMA
From the forbidden city...
>REMEMBER WHEN Q SAID THE FULL WEIGHT OF THE HOUSE WAS NECESSARY FOR WHAT COMES NEXT THEN THE DEMS WON THE HOUSE???
Think about the two possible outcomes and our objectives. In our reality, the democrat won House vs. POTUS and co has exposed the democrats as hypocritical, self-interested, stubborn, unreasonable, obstructionists, petty, immature, arrogant, bitter, unhinged, and more.
The conflicts have caused people to tune in and pay attention. It allowed for a spotlight on the issues, such as immigration at the present. POTUS redpilled millions on what’s happening at the border and successfully framed the national conversation about the topic as STARTING with acknowledging that there’s a crisis. He’s gone from the xenophobically smeared “build the wall to keep the brown people out” perception to “the wall seems to be the most efficient solution to the danger we’re exposed to.”
If Republicans won the House, the dems would still look like powerless victims. Trump would seem like he was just wielding his power and having his lackies forward his ego-driven agenda. Normies would tune out and keep hating.
The conflict is GOOD for keeping eyes focused on places where red-pills can be found and exposing the core of both side’s motivations.
Then Barr is confirmed and DECLAS begins ... ?
~~~
I like that very much! Works for me!!
I noticed that too.
Clowns In America.
Q
30
45
60
90
Timeline of
BOOM
BOOM
BOOM
BOOM ?
Whew.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Well, you should get a prize for being such an incredible survivor!
Her ultimate point seemed to be to attack POTUS as possibly corrupt, but to get there, she spent 95% of the time outlining the many ways that Congressvermin are corrupt and how that corruption works.
It wasn't a prognostication, it was an interpretation of Q.
It's what we do.
Bagster
I’m actually beginning to wonder about that. facepalm. shaking head.
If she’s not, then someone is doing a great job of controlling her and she is being played like a fiddle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.