From the forbidden city...
>REMEMBER WHEN Q SAID THE FULL WEIGHT OF THE HOUSE WAS NECESSARY FOR WHAT COMES NEXT THEN THE DEMS WON THE HOUSE???
Think about the two possible outcomes and our objectives. In our reality, the democrat won House vs. POTUS and co has exposed the democrats as hypocritical, self-interested, stubborn, unreasonable, obstructionists, petty, immature, arrogant, bitter, unhinged, and more.
The conflicts have caused people to tune in and pay attention. It allowed for a spotlight on the issues, such as immigration at the present. POTUS redpilled millions on what’s happening at the border and successfully framed the national conversation about the topic as STARTING with acknowledging that there’s a crisis. He’s gone from the xenophobically smeared “build the wall to keep the brown people out” perception to “the wall seems to be the most efficient solution to the danger we’re exposed to.”
If Republicans won the House, the dems would still look like powerless victims. Trump would seem like he was just wielding his power and having his lackies forward his ego-driven agenda. Normies would tune out and keep hating.
The conflict is GOOD for keeping eyes focused on places where red-pills can be found and exposing the core of both side’s motivations.
I wonder if Q’s #2680 mentioning Wm Barr’s comment on Uranium One & Hildy (Breitbart) is wise just prior to Barr’s Senate confirmation vote.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Please see my post #1011. Apparently Barr was passed .....um....ooops - sorry - no, he wasn’t....My mistake....he was passed out of committee, not confirmed.
“The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday voted along party lines to approve William Barr’s nomination to become attorney general.”
“...The full Senate must now vote on Barr’s nomination and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday said, “I hope and expect he will be confirmed next week.”
Since he has not had the final confirmation vote yet, I am guessing Q had a reason for mentioning that... but I can see how that mention is calculated to rile up certain elements of the DS Senate! LOL!
Don't think it will affect any "R" votes and absolutely won't affect the votes against.
At worst, Schumer could emote about how the whole thing should just be put off #justbecausehewantsitthatway, but even with this Black Mark, Barr may just be as close to a lock for the AG job as you could find.
Only real effect, JMHO, just might be a sudden epidemic of elite types (including office holders) suddenly discovering urgent need to leave DC/US after reading these last few Q drops.
I'm going to be up early tomorrow to check the Sunday Morning Dreadfuls for sudden reschedules just because of that hunch......
Nobody to the left of Romney seems to have had a good day since SOTU, and Romney didn't look exactly full of joy either.
I had that same thought.
PANIC IN DC.
But:
Nothing can stop what is coming.
Nothing.
Bagster
(Yawn, Its tomorrow Bob!)
Someone may already have addressed it.
Since his nomination was passed in committee and moved to the full Senate I do not think there is an issue. The Pubbies have have a majority. I do not think that DJ investigating HRC would disuade their vote, and since the DemSenz minority already oppose him it won’t affect their vote.