Bagster
Posted on 01/13/2019 11:31:29 PM PST by ransomnote
The way my wifes onocologist explained it was if discovered within 10 years it is typically considered the same cancer independent of where it is located and treated as though it has metastized. He said of course there are exceptions (ie every male will eventually get prostate cancer it’s just a matter of when so that is treated different even if there was a prior cancer)
After that time frame (he said it has changed over time) it is considered a new cancer and will be treated dependent on the new location.
That pharmacy delivery story involved members of Congress, so not RBG.
https://www.newsweek.com/right-wing-activist-laura-loomer-nancy-pelosi-house-1291083 WOMAN OF THE YEAR
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes! Woman of the Year, for sure! Wow, how did she come up with that? But it makes sense. BIGLY!
She is such a creative and brave person.
In Newsweek, no less? KEK. Must mean some folks are getting red-pilled... *grin*
Clancy sets up a similar scenario with China in The Bear and the Dragon. In that case we squeeze China too hard and they go after the Russians’ oil fields. I only bring this up to share his analysis of the politburo. They don’t see reality like we do. They see what they want to see. And they just might go to war with foreigners if its between that and facing social unrest at home.
The way my wifes onocologist explained it was if discovered within 10 years it is typically considered the same cancer independent of where it is located and treated as though it has metastized. He said of course there are exceptions (ie every male will eventually get prostate cancer it’s just a matter of when so that is treated different even if there was a prior cancer)
After that time frame (he said it has changed over time) it is considered a new cancer and will be treated dependent on the new location.
````````````````````````
Ok. So, if she had colon cancer in 1999, but not until 2009 did they discover the pancreatic cancer, then that would explain why they said she had pancreatic cancer vs. a “return” (???) of her colon cancer. (Think I got it.)
Whew. ThankQ.
Irrelevant. Auto correct error.
I wrote in one of my responses that the use of the term congress to refer to both chambers of the US legislature has become the normative.
It has ALWAYS been the ‘normative’
Article I (Article 1 - Legislative)
Section 1
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
On the other hand it isn’t normative in Nebraska when speaking of their legislature. To quote Wikileaks, “In 1934, voters approved a constitutional amendment to take effect with the 1936 elections, abolishing the House of Representatives and granting its powers to the Senate.[4].”
What I take this to mean is that the US ‘Legislature’ is bicameral and that the powers of it are divided into two parts a Senate and a House. The adopted term congress was nullified in one state where a unicameral was voted in. Therefore, governing without a legislature wouldn’t be possible in our form of Republic. Whereas Congress as an entity is subservient to the Legislative Branch by title. Ie. Nebraska said it doesn’t need one.
~~~~~~~
Just a side note, it appears that Wikileaks condensed a lot of what that old Nebraska Gov’t book had to say under the heading Nebraska Legislature.
Love it!
These Barr hearings are most captivating! He’s got the experience to carry himself authoritatively and doesn’t hold back when it comes to speaking his mind. He just shut DiChi down, her asking about any possiblity of “obstruction” and his memo to RR + the Mule pertaining to POTUS over US Attorneys and he told her, “no, because they’re political appointees”.
Funny how that guy used a liberal gay slur, last seen during the time of the Tea Party. Must be AC.
I’ve always thought Thomas Lifson was pretty solid. Looky here what he’s thinking.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/01/trumps_shutdown_trap.html
Bagster
Oooooo. Wouldn't that be awesome?
Bagster
::Military tribunals at Camp David?::
@@@@
Would that be legally permissable?
::Military tribunals at Camp David?::
@@@@
Would that be legally permissable?
Anderson Cooper.
Amen
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.