Posted on 12/31/2018 10:32:03 PM PST by ransomnote
Q Anon: 12/26/18 Trust Trump's Plan
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
Archive tangsoo et. al. Q Boot Camp Quickest way to learn the basics about Q.
YouTube Storm Is Upon Us Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube Dan Duval Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 -Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
“Pay Attention”
Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread Qanon.app Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Thread Qanonposts.com Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website Qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Thread Qmap.pub QProofs/Memes - compiled “proofs” and memes
Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website Whitehouse Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website FBI vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website State Dept. foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table FReeQs Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
“Power to the People”
Website Saul Montes-Bradley Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex, Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
Vimeo Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops. Also, his own website, ITunes and Podbean.com
Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drop. Also, his own website
YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
YOUTUBEr X22 Report Investigative Q-drop reactions
YOUTUBE In Pursuit of Truth Brisk, lively analysis of Q drops and swamp contortions
Lisa Mei Crowley Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information
“Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Website roserambles.org Q Cards
Thread Little Jeremiah Memes
Thread Jim Robinson Board Owner's Rules for Posts on Free Republic
“Fight, Fight, Fight! ”
YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images
YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Re picture of Trump with new cabinet:
I was able to watch part of that! He said so much! I was aware he was making some news, but there was so much I didn’t retain it!
He was on fire!
I think he is DEFINITELY in ACTION MODE now! [As if he hadn’t already been! LOL!]
Enigo54 to TEXOKIE
#HappyWarriors
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
“#HappyWarriors indeed......contrasting with the others we too often see:
#HappyWorriers
#CleverYouAre
Klipsch. For the win.
Dammit you beat me to Klipsch. You win for now ...
ping
My question is will the news media televise it when they “LOTION THE PUMPKIN?”
Other than their bass box and controller, which I keep smoking ..
Glad to be in such esteemed company! Always good to win!
Well, OK but that takes a lot of the fun out of it. I check every source. If DJT sent it to me, I just automatically check it. Speaking of which, have you seen this one? Someone should post the pick. https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=3g5VllyM&id=B2AC1B49CC621523725FE992D1C72BADBB672440&thid=OIP.3g5VllyMIM-Hz7Vu40-ZiwHaJ4&mediaurl=http%3a%2f%2fi0.kym-cdn.com%2fphotos%2fimages%2ffacebook%2f001%2f350%2f175%2f067.jpg&exph=1000&expw=750&q=cancer+satire+memes+protesting+trump&simid=608051120054537285&selectedIndex=0&ajaxhist=0
2626 - Dec 19 2018
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0365ff No.4381127
Dec 19 2018 18:11:25 (EST)
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/flynn-hearing-leaves-far-right-s-conspiracy-theorists-wanting-n949626
The clock is ticking.
When will the 1st alarm ring?
If the Senate was the primary target (majority control)
.
53-47 active when?
EO (designated_target(s)) active when?
Ongoing investigations
..
"There are a lot of sealed indictments" - SC
"It's all going to come out, U1, Dossier, CF, etc
." - SH
"I have pretty good sources
" - SH
There is a reason why SH, SC, and JS are on stage.
Q
---------------------------------------
2495 - Nov 20 2018
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 6e0a05 No.3978509
Nov 20 2018 22:00:31 (EST)
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1065067172429529088
TOGETHER WE WIN.
Attacks on WHITAKER will only intensify.
SENATE WAS THE TARGET.
53-47
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-senate-committees/senate-judiciary-chair-grassleys-move-to-leave-key-opening-idUSKCN1NL231
Q
----------------------------
2493 - Nov 13 2018
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.467
Nov 13 2018 00:12:14 (EST)
53-47
Q
---------------------------------
2318 - Oct 2 2018 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.320
Oct 2 2018 14:31:13 (EST)
53-47
Q
----------------------------
US Senate advances Saudi guided-munitions sale, 53-47
By: Joe Gould June 13, 2017 June 13, 2017 June 13, 2017
Correction: This story has been corrected to add one vote to the opposing party, making the vote 53-47.
WASHINGTON The U.S. Senate narrowly voted 53-47 along largely partisan lines to approve a $510 million sale of precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia on Tuesday.
The sale's supporters, largely Republican, said opponents in seeking to score political points against U.S. President Donald Trump would strengthen Iran's hand. The vote was framed by critics of the sale as a rebuke of Saudi Arabia's activities in the Yemen civil war.
Lawmakers voted down a joint resolution disapproving of the sale. Had it been successful, the vote would have been the first time in decades a congressional body voted to bar a weapons sale to Saudi Arabia. It would have also been a public setback to Trump weeks after he announced a $110 billion arms deal with Riyadh, a key part of his Middle East policy and first overseas trip as president.
"This is one of those things, you're cutting your nose off to spite your face, and there are some, not all, who are using this to get a piece of the Trump administration's hide," Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., a supporter of the sale, said ahead of the vote. "I would hope that we would rise above that and realize that Saudi Arabia, with their flaws, has been a reliable ally.
"There is no classified evidence that they purposely tried to kill civilians, and in fact we have the opposite, and they already own the bombs, and we're helping them not kill civilians."
Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky.; Chris Murphy, D-Conn., and Al Franken, D-Minn., sponsored the resolution objecting to the sales because they say the bombs are being used in the Yemeni civil war to target civilians. Saudi officials have denied the charge.
Opponents of the sale also pointed to the mushrooming humanitarian crisis in Yemen, as the war is marked by cholera and famine. Paul cast the vote as a referendum on U.S. support for the Saudi air campaign and Congress' opportunity to assert its war-making responsibilities.
"Should the United States be actively involved with refueling the Saudi planes, with picking targets, with having advisers on the ground?" Paul said in a floor speech ahead of the vote. "Should we be at war in Yemen? If you remember your Constitution, it says no president has that authority; only to repel imminent attack, but no president alone has the unilateral authority to take us to war. And yet, here we are on the verge of war."
Opponents of the sale were buoyed by support from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's ranking member, Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. Both lawmakers had opposed a similar resolution Paul and Murphy offered last year.
In a Senate floor speech ahead of the vote, Schumer said that Riyadh's support for Wahhabism, a strict Muslim sect that adheres closely to the Koran, is "responsible for much of the radicalization of Muslim youth in the Middle East in North Africa."
"The White House has not clearly articulated how the U.S. will put pressure on Saudi Arabia to end their support of Wahhabi schools," Schumer said. "Even as the president's visit was focused on curbing terrorism, the administration has not efficiently assured Congress that the weapons will not fall into the wrong hands."
The $510 million sale of precision-guided munitions, or PGMs, is part of the $110 billion arms agreement Trump announced during his visit to Saudi Arabia last month. This portion of the sale senators are able to reject because the State Department officially notified Congress, triggering a 30-day window for congressional review.
Tuesday's vote was much closer than the similar resolution last year. Five Democrats (Sens. Joe Donnelley, Joe Manchin, Claire McCaskill, Bill Nelson and Mark Warner) voted with the majority to support the sale. Four Republicans (Sens. Paul, Dean Heller, Mike Lee and Todd Young) voted with the minority to block it.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and other defenders of the sale said it would boost the Saudi kingdom's precision-targeting ability and include training to avoid civilian casualties. Given Saudi Arabia's aid to U.S. efforts to counter the Islamic State group, "now is not the time to undermine one of our critical allies in the Arab world by disapproving part of an arms sale package that will improve Saudi capabilities," he said.
Across the Capitol and ahead of the vote, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Joe Westphal, said the Obama administration had wrestled with how to provide offensive munitions while persuading Riyadh to reach an agreement with its foes: the Houthi rebels and ousted Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh. The State Department, he said, was working with the Kingdom's military to limit civilian casualties.
"Our efforts there ought to be to push hard. If you are going to receive these systems from us, these PGMs from us, we insist you work harder to train your forces on how to use them," Westphal said at a hearing in a House Foreign Affairs hearing on Tuesday. "There's a lot more we can do than sell them a weapons system without any constraints."
Meanwhile, Democrats at the hearing took aim at the Trump administration's handling of the split between Saudi Arabia and Qatar, as well as the resulting diplomatic crisis.
Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla., called the president's focus on security "a mistake" and a signal the administration is willing to forsake human rights when convenient. Deutch said he was "deeply troubled" by reports of civilian casualties in the Saudi-led bombing campaign in Yemen.
Of the proposed $110 billion sale, Deutch said lawmakers don't know enough about its impact on Israel's qualitative military edge. "Being an ally does not mean getting a blank check," he said.
Email: jgould@defensenews.comTwitter: @reporterjoe
---------------------------------------
"SENATE WAS THE TARGET.
53-47" - Q
Demons wanted to protect Isis?
https://qanon.pub/?q=53-47
I’ve always referred to them as sealed filings to include indictments, search warrants, etc.
I don’t seem to have as much time as I used to have. Is someone fooling with my clocks? So I just have to pick and choose what to look at, you know what I mean... I have read that as the mortal coil gets more years on it, time speeds up. I believe it.
That poster on the cabinet table that said sanctions coming November 4th? Last election was on the 6th. Anybody? I have to get ready for work.
If you find a youtube or replay of the presser or whatever he said - was he talking to cabinet or press or both? I would LOVE to listen.
Only they aren’t Happy Worriers, they’re miserable, and they want us to be miserable with them.
I refuse!
What’s written on that pic ?
can’t trust Romney
52-48
There is the Facelift sucking her teeth on TV again.
What in the name of Zeus’ eyeballs is wrong with her that she sucks her teeth? Is it a nervous tic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.