Gravity is mathematically relatable to dynamics of subatomic particles

Phys.org ^ | Dec 18, 2018 | Catherine Zandonella, Princeton University

[Fresh Wind]

Yes, his desk looks much like mine.

[adorno]

Okay, so now we have ONE particle that caused the "big bang"? Which atom, sub-atomic particle was that? A neutrino or other? Where did that singular particle come from?

The 'origin' particle, or the "God particle" or the singularity, was not an atom, nor hydrogen, nor a proton or neutron or neutrino or electron or a 'string'.

Nobody knows exactly what is was or how it came into 'existence'. But, whatever it was, was capable of receiving many different properties, depending upon it's existence in time. IOW, it's time that gave the 'singularity' its properties. That particle existed and exists in all instances of time, and it's property of multiple existences is what causes 'matter' as we know it to exist. It takes an unending number of existences of that singularity to create even a single proton or neutron or electron or whatever other particle we might detect. Time is not running out, and the singularity has enough time to create and even decompose into other matter particles. Energy is just a different manifestation of that particle, and it's just the instances of when the singularity is busy doing its endless number of things, either in the past or the future or now. The singularity knows nothing about time, but it uses time to do everything that goes into composing matter and energy.

So, where did this singularity come from? We are not smart enough to know or understand, but, it is the God particle that exists in every instance of time and in every thing. It's the creator of everything, and it's the ultimate paradox in the universe. Our brains are too puny to even begin to understand. But, there is a 'creator', and it is what created the universe, via the paradoxical singularity/time framework.

Imagine a being that can decompose/decipher/determine/break down, in its 'mind' the exact number of particles (and singularities) and their time frames, just by 'looking' or touching or detecting an item. You become just a set of singularities and infinitesimally small time frames, but, that 'creator' understands exactly what you are, because, you were exactly what that creator intended.

I'll stop now. Getting a headache

[BradyLS]

I’m working on the Dippin’ Dots Theory.

[2nd Amendment]

I knew it too but I didn’t tell anybody cause then I would have to destroy them or send them to the DNC!

[Swordmaker]

Gravity explains very little of what we observe in the universe, so little in fact, that every new observation leaves orthodox gravity theory cosmologists surprised, baffled, shocked and always without a rational explanation that does not require ther mathematical invocation of "dark" invisible and undetectable magical particles and energy to balance their oh, so beautiful descriptive theoretical multidimensional, but not real-world, equations. On the other hand, plasma/electric Universe cosmologists, who propose electromagnetism as the driving force of the cosmos, a force thirty-nine orders of magnitude stronger than gravity and equally infinite in range, have suggested a theory and model of gravity which works and explains all of the anomalies the orthodox gravity cosmologists theories cannot. . . without resorting to invoking any magic. — Electric/Plasma Universe PING

Gravity in an Electric/Plasma Universe — YouTube

Clear Example of a Birkeland Current
"Z" Pinch with Symmetrical Plasmids
Gravity Driven Cosmology has no rational explanation for these objects
seen in Hubble Telescope View of
The Twin Jet Nebula
ELECTRIC/PLASMA UNIVERSE PING!

If you on or off the Electric/Plasma Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.

[BradyLS]

Yeah, but the sneering condescension that would accompany every explanation would be nigh unbearable.

[mikrofon]

Bohemian Gravity

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks ETL.

---

· String Theory Ping List ·

---

---

· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·

---

[thoughtomator]

reads like a sales brochure

[thoughtomator]

the point is someone needs grant money to fund a life of producing complete bullshit

[Fzob]

Bump for later

[thoughtomator]

> What is it that gives the String Theory its name?

The ability to string along various gullible institutions into funding mathematical autoeroticism for decade after decade.

[samtheman]

Interesting

[Eddie01]

I didn’t see Sheldon Cooper’s name mentioned...

[broken_arrow1]

Prove it!

[Wuli]

And you can’t physically “time travel” (as with a “time machine) either, which is why it is an irrelevant “dimension” as far as the physical level of our existense goes - as will be so called “mathematically possible” other dimensions as well. Such ideas have no empirical relevance to our physical existence and will always be in the realm of theoretical science, never practical science.

[onedoug]

Time, mathematics and physics.

Thank God.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!

[A Navy Vet]

You make my case. Much of physics is math trying to prove some theory on white board. Some times right - sometimes wrong. We agree that it is beyond human comprehension as to how the singularity came about, whether one singular particle or a basketball size combination of elements. I admire physicists, but they are not asking the right questions.

Merry Christmas.

[LiteKeeper]

Please fast forward to the origin of what might be called a “body plan”? How can that be explained by etchings on a “white board?”

[adorno]

You make my case.

Okay, but, I still don't know what your case is.

Math is just a tool, a means of communications for physics and other sciences. Math is not wrong when applied correctly and without agendas. Math is just interpretations via numbers and equations, and a lot of times, intelligent 'guesswork'.