Posted on 11/13/2018 10:04:47 PM PST by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Storm Is Upon Us Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
“Pay Attention”
Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread Qanon.app Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Thread Qanonposts.com Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website Qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website Whitehouse Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website FBI vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website State Dept. foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table FReeQs Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
“Power to the People”
Vimeo Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops. Also, his own website, ITunes and Podbean.com
Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drop. Also, his own website YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI GAB.AI ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions. Neonrevolt Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactions Also, @NeonRevolt on GAB.AI
GAB.AI Thomas_Wictor Includes excellent analysis of the Swamp
Lisa Mei Crowley Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Whoa!
California and Maryland are the only states that place restrictions on flame throwers.
The Feds don’t ban, they left it up to the state.
Makes sense to me. Too often, too many FREEPERS have been like typical Christians--eating our own too quickly, too eagerly, over too little.
Makes sense to me. Too often, too many FREEPERS have been like typical Christians--eating our own too quickly, too eagerly, over too little.
With respect. You werent here back then. He made all sorts of representations that Ken Starr has bad things about Clinton. Even when the spinach dip was found on the blue dress, he still claimed Starr had serious offenses that the Dems could not refute.
Electrify it to the level needed for a big longhorn bull?
Ah yes, how well some of us remember "Quidham". Makes one wonder if he just shortened his name doesn't it?
- I wasn'tt here (or wasnt paying attention)when Quidham was active, but I can almost understand that, having been humiliated by him one could be overly vicious to another with a familiar name.
I recall a Three Stooges episode where a woman slapped Larry across the face and declared how dare you remind me of someone I hate!
I wonder, was quidham as well vetted and researched as Q has been on thi thread? As for me, if Q turns out to be fake...it makes no difference as we have done our due diligence and my self esteem will not be harmed.
I’m not convinced Quidam was fake—just that his predictions didn’t meat the criteria of some . . . and he may have reached beyond the length of his arms or contacts.
So you're a banned retread. Makes sense. So you know, I don't look to a majority consensus to decide what I think, deocRats and communists do that, pinko.
I responded because you asked this on post #204....<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>
so I posted what Quidam was about back then. I left no impression he had anything to do with Q. And for some reason you seem to think I randomly raised the matter.
I remember Quidam.
Here's my Quidam theory.
Quidam never presented as an inside source like Q does. Some say he was Matt Drudge or some other Drudge-like person. If so, that's not an "insider" per se. That would be somebody who has INSIDER INFORMATION. In other words, a Woodward and Bernstein-like figure. One with "inside sources".
Somebody comparable today to a LS, Jerome 'Fatbody' Corsi, Sara Carter, or a John Soloman.
Of course there are people that have "inside sources". Always have been, always will be.
The huge difference between Qanon and Quidam and those others is that Q professes, and has been proven to be, THE insider. Not somebody the insider is communicating through.
And this is the mistake those who compare Q to Quidam make. It's apples and oranges.
And on the subject of Quidam. I think the only "proof" that those who call Quidam a hoax or a Larp have is that Clinton didn't get removed from office, like Quidam led us to believe he would.
We have seen four ourselves that people who are reported (by Q) to have been "turned" sometimes change their minds for various reasons. People don't always behave predictably. Quidam, or Q, can know of a deal made that gets broken. These are simply realities. It's good that we understand those things.
To dismiss Quidam out of hand as a hoax or a Larp is to not understand reality and all the possibilities that exist. It's really an "expand your thinking" thing.
Not only do I believe Q is legit, but I also believe this hard truth. That there is a possibility that Trump and his team (which includes Q and other patriots) could fail in this valiant and brave attempt to rescue America and the world.
Like I said in another post, the Derp State is vast, international, wealthy beyond understanding, and willing to do things we are not.
We can still lose. And that's what I think we did during the Clinton years. We lost. Those (perhaps) supplying Quidam with his information, lost.
And from there, our very own negative nelly FReepers were broken, never again to take a chance and maybe to lose hope forever. I've seen this attitude over and over and over again on the threads over the past year, with regards to Q. People get old. People get tired.
It has been my personal hope to reignite their fighting spirit, as mine has been. We can't give up on our true brothers and sisters, and they are many, despite their attacks on us.
We will need all our soldiers in the wars to come.
So, was Quidam a hoax? Maybe. And maybe not. Maybe he just lost.
People need to think about that.
Bagster
Yeah. And some here that seem to fail to think much at all; and some who seem to be very poorly informed in spite of tons of good information hereon.
::BEST PRESIDENT IN MY LIFETIME!::
......
Ditto
Quidam was a woman! .
from #204
With respect, I kinda was.
Didn't post, though. Still, I was there.
Bagster
So I responded to who Quidam was and made no reference to anything else
.
Ok, but if youre asking about the guy, I followed him like a fool
I like Mark Taylor, too. He’s a bit wound up at times but these are issues worth being wound up about. I do NOT like most of the male interviewers because they talk more of the time and don’t allow Mark to talk much when Mark’s the reason we click on the channel to begin with. Some of those male interviewer channels I no longer click on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.