Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DrDude; ransomnote; generally; TEXOKIE; bagster; defconw; JockoManning; All

Link to John Solomon’s late night article - foot note 43 and recent congressional testimony indicate that redactions are to save embarrassment for DOJ/FBI:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410287-fbis-smoking-gun-redactions-protected-political-embarrassment-not?

FBI’s smoking gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’

NO SURPRISE, but another trickle of dark to light becoming public.


218 posted on 10/08/2018 10:26:26 AM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes

Wasn’t there recently an EO that insures that NO INFORMATION from FOIA requests be withheld/redacted for ‘cause of embarrassment’ to the particular authority ?


239 posted on 10/08/2018 10:48:08 AM PDT by bitt (We want judges that protects us from them. They, the ruling elites, want judges that PROTECT THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: Bigg Red

Mark


596 posted on 10/09/2018 5:07:09 AM PDT by Bigg Red (The USA news industry, the MSM-13, takes a machete to the truth. {h/t TigersEye})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson