Q Anon: 09/26/18 Trust Trump's Plan

Ah, my bad. Wrong reply.

1,881 posted on 09/29/2018 12:53:49 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)

Agreed again, but it’s 7th investigation time before his turn.

1,882 posted on 09/29/2018 12:53:53 AM PDT by kallisti (I don't suppose I could buy back my introduction to you.)

No flag on the play.

1,883 posted on 09/29/2018 12:56:02 AM PDT by kallisti (I don't suppose I could buy back my introduction to you.)

You are joking, right? Today's CURRENT is yesteday's FUTURE.
The FUTURE never arrives, except in the abstract, because it becomes NOW and events then become CURRENT.
And once that moment passes those events, just like yesterday's events, become the PAST.

1,884 posted on 09/29/2018 1:05:24 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)

The FUTURE never arrives, except in the abstract, because it becomes NOW and events then become CURRENT.

Seriously? You want to disagree with me so much that you engage in such ridiculous semantics?

Today's current is not yesterday's future, because it first has to become "now," and only then becomes the future.

Does not refute what I said at all, and why do you want to? We are on the same side. Ridiculous!

1,885 posted on 09/29/2018 1:19:23 AM PDT by kevao (BIBLICAL JESUS: Give your money to the poor. SOCIALIST JESUS: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)

Abstract - I look forward to hearing from you in the future.

Do you KNOW if either of us will even be alive at that future point in time?
It's impossible to KNOW such a thing. One of us could die in a car accident tomorrow and that abstract, possible FUTURE would be impossible due to events in the NOW.

1,886 posted on 09/29/2018 1:19:49 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)

Does not refute what I said at all, and why do you want to?
Because what you said is wrong.

1,887 posted on 09/29/2018 1:22:28 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)

Does not refute what I said at all, and why do you want to?
And it's defeatism as well.

1,888 posted on 09/29/2018 1:24:32 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)

Abstract - I look forward to hearing from you in the future.

Hi, philman_36. You're wish comes true right now at this very moment. You're hearing from me in real time.

Welcome to the FUTURE!

1,889 posted on 09/29/2018 1:25:59 AM PDT by kevao (BIBLICAL JESUS: Give your money to the poor. SOCIALIST JESUS: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)

Because what you said is wrong.

I've been wrong before. No doubt. But every time, someone has explained to me how or why.

Give it a try. I am not to proud.

1,890 posted on 09/29/2018 1:29:15 AM PDT by kevao (BIBLICAL JESUS: Give your money to the poor. SOCIALIST JESUS: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)

Yep, K is delayed, but not derailed. The legacy of his railroading will be more than just his vindication.

Your great post cheered me up. I needed that slap in the face. You are so right.

Bagster

1,891 posted on 09/29/2018 1:37:06 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

You're hearing from me in real time.
That would only be true if we were speaking in person. We're not doing that.
Welcome to the FUTURE!
What I'm seeing in your reply is the PAST, which was your CURRENT and is no longer.

And with that I'll bid you good night.
I look forward to hearing from you in the future.
LOL

1,892 posted on 09/29/2018 1:38:14 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)

No offense, but you are an ideal candidate for the Keynesians. No, I’m not talking about Barack Obama being born in Kenya....

John Maynard Keynes shaped economic thought in the post WWII era. One of his famous quotes was, “In the long run, we are all dead.”

And why not? The future never arrives. Right?

If you do not think we are suffering the results of decades of Keynesian economic thought, that his long-run (the future) has never arrived because we must first, and necessarily, actualize the NOW at this very moment in order to make the PAST the FUTURE, then I could recommend several past and present economic texts to challenge that idea.

1,893 posted on 09/29/2018 1:47:36 AM PDT by kevao (BIBLICAL JESUS: Give your money to the poor. SOCIALIST JESUS: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)

To: philman_36; kevao

The FUTURE never arrives, except in the abstract, because it becomes NOW and events then become CURRENT. And once that moment passes those events, just like yesterday's events, become the PAST.

Bagster

1,894 posted on 09/29/2018 2:04:19 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

Latest, Mad Maxine doxing Republicans!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ0ttS3GISA

1,895 posted on 09/29/2018 2:04:56 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins

I included that link in Ford’s entry in the LexiQon. Thanks.

1,896 posted on 09/29/2018 2:20:29 AM PDT by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)

To: ransomnote; TEXOKIE; bagster; Wneighbor; little jeremiah; txhurl; Aquamarine

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/09/why-the-brett-kavanaugh-smear.php

Why the Brett Kavanaugh Smear?

One question I have pondered over the last few weeks is, why are the Democrats so determined to block Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court? Realistically, he is the most moderate nominee they are likely to see from the Trump administration. If his nomination fails, the president will most likely appoint Amy Barrett, who is secure against #MeToo allegations and is both more conservative and younger than Kavanaugh. So what is the point?

To some extent, the Democrats’ bizarre smear campaign against Kavanaugh is explicable on short-term political grounds. The Democrats’ crazed base demands that they #Resist, so resist they will, whether it does any good or not. But I think there is something deeper and more sinister at work.

Brett Kavanaugh enjoys one of the most spotless reputations of anyone in American public life. He has been enthusiastically endorsed by those who have known him all his life–by girls he knew in high school and college, by judges he has served with, by professors and students and Harvard and Yale law schools, by judges who have worked with him, by his judicial clerks–most of whom have been women–by the American Bar Association, by sitting Supreme Court justices. In short, everyone who has ever known or dealt with Brett Kavanaugh endorses him.

I think that Judge Kavanaugh’s pristine reputation is one reason why the Democrats have unleashed against him a smear campaign unparalleled in American history. This is the message they are trying to send: If we can do this to the Boy Scout Brett Kavanaugh, we can do it to anyone. Are you thinking of serving in a Republican administration? Or accepting an appointment to the federal judiciary from a Republican president? Think twice, and then think again.

Because our smear machine will reach back to middle school if necessary. If we can’t find any dirt on you, we will manufacture some. There is no depth to which we will not stoop, and your honesty, integrity and spotless reputation are no match for our control over the media and our determination to dredge up ridiculous allegations against anyone who stands in our way.

Really, the more ridiculous the better. If we can accuse Brett Kavanaugh, one of the most respected lawyers and judges in America, of gang rape, we can accuse anyone of anything! And our insane accusations will dominate the news.

That is the Democratic Party’s message. And we have learned from the Christine Ford fiasco that accusations don’t require corroborating evidence. A single wacky, false allegation will negate decades of hard work on behalf of the American people.

By smearing the ultimate Boy Scout, the Democrats signal that they are determined to go lower than anyone has ever gone in American history. They intend to deter normal people from serving in Republican administrations, or accepting appointments from Republican presidents, or, ultimately, from identifying themselves with the Republican party. Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature. The fact that the Democrats’ smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.

The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware–if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone. You’d better go quietly and cede power to us.

1,897 posted on 09/29/2018 2:21:06 AM PDT by mairdie

***If we lose seats, then we won’t get anyone, and there won’t be a recess to make appointments in***

And if we don't see the unredacted docs soon we will know the people no longer rule this country. Q said the Dems offered to drop opposition to Kavanaugh if the redacted docs were not released. They have NOT dropped opposition to K and the unredacted documents are still in limbo.

The Democrap Party, the party of the little guy (Andrew Jackson), is 100% in the control of a cabal of billionaires and their media. World domination is their goal.

1,898 posted on 09/29/2018 2:25:11 AM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)

To: bagster; philman_36

I think philman_36 and I are being “Excellent to Each Other.”

We’re playing around a little, sure. But not calling each other names. And we can both be proud of that, all things considered around here lately.

But why are you butting where it’s not necessary, since you’re contributing nothing at all productive to the conversation? You created a meme just for our conversation?

That meme, by the way, for anyone interested, has nothing to do with Q. Nothing at all!

Nobody in his right mind would spend just a few hours analyzing that meme to discover several revelations that we’ll all witness in the coming four weeks. (”ThanksQiving,” anyone?)

Those who have ears, let them hear. Those who have eyes, let them see.

Full Legal Disclosure: I do not know bagster personally, nor is he paying me any money directly.

1,899 posted on 09/29/2018 2:35:36 AM PDT by kevao (BIBLICAL JESUS: Give your money to the poor. SOCIALIST JESUS: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)

Imho the congressional committee rules need to be revised and strengthened with regard to due process, which needs to include a right to a speedy hearing by any nominee to any position being considered by any committee. Otherwise congress is open to alinsky style attacks (using the system against itself). Criminal allegations should be referred first to the respective jurisdictional authorities before any allegations are considered by congress.

1,900 posted on 09/29/2018 2:51:20 AM PDT by SteveH

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794