Posted on 09/17/2018 10:36:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
That was almost like more fun than election night what with us getting DDOSed by the derps back then and at the inauguration.
I did not post that comment, I was replying to it. And I didnt see it as racist. I understood the meaning to be
beyond the pale
phrase of pale
outside the bounds of acceptable behavior.
“the language my father used was beyond the pale”
I don’t think there’s much danger of us counting our chickens before they hatch, Cletus. We needed them to go kinetic in some way. We’ve been taking a lot of fire, watching the derps walk around free, knowing what we thought was going to happen but waiting is hard. We are celebrating our side going on the offensive, but I doubt any of us equate it with total victory.
Beyond the pale -
Location - example:
“Dad, where is the mop?”
“It’s out in the garage near the shelves, just beyond the pale...”
I had considered the option of Sessions unrecusing, but I never thought “sweet Loretta” would join the “lovely Lisa” page in singing a happy tune to the investigators. I also didn’t get it about the Red Carpet event. I was still hung up on green socks and wondering how it would be possible to see ANYBODY’s socks on a TV broadcast.
Sessions Retracting His Recusal
First, one must ask, “How do recusals work?”
A recusal is made when an actor determines that a conflict of interest in an investigation may occur during that investigation. That actor, then, chooses to recuse so as to eliminate “poisoning” the investigation; it is ethics.
In very few cases (none come to mind immediately) are recusals either demanded or enforced on a member of the court (NOTE: I’m not certain how THIS part applies to executive branch actors.) Recusals are almost exclusively a personal and ethical decision made by the actor and are not a legally bound action nor a contract of performance.
Next, one should ask, “Who has authority over a recusal?” Recusals, being solely an ethical decision by the actor, provide that only the actor can alter that recusal. From changing the scope as information is determined to un-recusing, all is under the authority of the recuser.
In the question we have before us “Why did ]Sessions[ write a letter to the SCOTUS regarding his recusal?”, we may conjecture that the letter was written as a way to pre-emptively block any lower court shenanigans regarding the original recusal. To wit, ]Sessions[ may have notified SCOTUS of an “un-recusal” in order to provide background on his “why” and a short excursis on recusals. The SCOTUS, having agreed that a recusal is an ethical and personal decision, would not be asked to give permission but to agree with the facts as presented by ]Sessions[.
This “agreement” would not have the force of law but would certainly let the lower courts know that SCOTUS will reserve their right /as SCOTUS/ to counsel the lower courts as to picking up any actions in this arena. STANDING/HARM will be paramount.
YMMV
The other option is that ‘O’ is a common honorific prefix could mean great, godly, exalted, etc and ‘ren’ means person or man/woman so in that case it would translate to ‘great woman of stone’.
Which kind of goes with the character hard and cold.
Re: green socks.
I am also wondering if it’s possible that it wasn’t referring to the color green, but instead that they were organic or something. That would give the guy cover so he wouldn’t out himself.
Lighten up Francis. It was a joke. Everybody is rayciss.
It would be an interesting study to graph DDOS attacks (number and intensity, etc.) and correlate them with the news.
It might paint a very interesting picture as to what the Derps fear most.
I am also wondering if its possible that it wasnt referring to the color green, but instead that they were organic or something. That would give the guy cover so he wouldnt out himself.
Some one posted that Green Socks refers to the transporting of marijuana.
She be dirty and skeered now.
Here’s an article that was posted on FR but did not get much discussion here.
Now that we’re not allowed to mention Q on other threads, I’m much more inclined to bring things back to the Q thread where they can be discussed fully than to participate on the non-Q threads with a crippling handicap.
Seems like I heard there was some button to click in FF so such would show. I don’t know what it is.
Fat lady is gargling...
What an inspiring post! I believe youve encapsulated the Q movement perfectly. Hats off to you!!
On a side note: what youve described on various other threads is true.
More doom and gloom hand wringing and resignation. Oh and the all too common boosting regarding whose been here longest, who knows more and whose doing more. Its sad, I feel like Im peeking in on a nursing home where they discuss how life used to be. Sad that there are those unwilling to join the modern age and the new battlefield that we find ourselves on.
Fat lady is gargling...
*************
Not until Hillary is in jail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.