Posted on 08/14/2018 8:02:37 PM PDT by JME_FAN
https://twitter.com/Gingrich_of_PA/status/1029559100592599046
https://twitter.com/Gingrich_of_PA/status/1029539932539375616
https://twitter.com/Gingrich_of_PA/status/1029546205137666048
https://twitter.com/Gingrich_of_PA/status/1029551705376088064
https://twitter.com/Gingrich_of_PA/status/1029557476771995650
I get your point. It’s not lost on me. However, the “logic” that those believing “Q” drops is no less lacking in proofs. That is the paradox of this mess. I’ll give you an example...
In the post linked below, the author describes (see bottom of his thread) how “Q” manipulates the meaning of an image, while forgetting that the time stamps and other info contained in the image data set reveal the fraud being done ...
https://www.patreon.com/posts/beanz-on-tracy-18851335
(you have an extra 'is' in there).
Anyway, the number of people who believe what they are saying is true but are wrong = (total population of the Earth-1(me)).
“even if his release of them does not yet satisfy our desire to have all the “facts.” I would only counsel you to have patience.”
Did you just ask for us to “trust the plan”?!
I don’t think EVERY Freeper believes EVERYTHING Q posts. I think it’s like the BELL CURVE. On one end, some believe nothing. On the other end, they believe everything. The majority is in the middle where a lot of evaluation is being done to determine one’s beliefs.
Your debunking of Q is very Q-like in its vagueness and total lack of clarity about anything.
So you Freudian slip that you are NOT a FReeper. Dumbass.
Q's constant admonition is to FIGHT.
No. The context is about waiting on more info to come forth on a current and developing story. The usual nature of such a composition is the opposite of a “plan,” since it supposes uncertainty.
Adam Gingrich is one of the few people whom you ought “take seriously,” as far as internet source trustworthiness. His accuracy rate is above 90 percent.
I’ve not studied the subject intently enough to determine whether the advocacy rate fits a bell curve model. However, I typically find the pro-Q people outweigh the “non-believers” whenever the subject is broached here on FR. That is anecdotal, but nevertheless disturbing, IMO.
Trump’s “base” is a far larger composite than the the number of posters found on FR. Don’t you think?
Except when it comes to pointing out that Jeff Sessions is recused and doing nothing. Then it's "sit back" and "trust Sessions" time.
You stupid RINO.
So says the biggest brainwashed dumbass on the board.
I think his supporters would have much different outlooks on the Muller investigation, the betrayal by Jeff Sessions, and the outcome of the midterm election - insofar as the possibility of Republicans losing control of the HOR.
I think the base would see the realities of the present political situation with a much more sober mindset than what we now observe in their general temperament, which, IMO, borders on indifference.
I believe they would thus fight the Dems with a greater intensity and resolve to win.
I believe they would purue the ongoing primaries with a much greater seriousness, and thus produce much heavier turnouts for Trump’s chosen candidates than what we have seen to date.
Insofar as the GOP keeping a majority in the House, I put the odds, at best, to be 50/50. And the more discouragement I see, the more division I see, the more bleak my projection becomes.
Did you forget to take your medication this morning?
Your troll-fu is piss poor.
You’re not very good at this. Back to the fake IRS robocalling bench with you...
A. I’m not the source of the debunking information.
B. I’ve linked to the source.
C. I’ve stated that this is a developing story, which by nature can be “vague” at first.
D. I’ve plainly stated that, if you wish to follow such development, you should regularly check the Twitter page of the individual who is posting the story.
None of those statement insist that you officially “follow” this individual, or click on any link he may provide. That would be your choice.
Perhaps you should consider putting down the bottle. Drunkenness is not a virtue
You missed. Again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.