Replies

#HollywoodRenegades

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I feel we should be very wary of taking this at face value.

It is a technique of disinformation to take a kernel of truth and then elaborate it with disprovable falsehoods.

Do we seriously believe that EVERY major male star had to go homo or pedo?

Do we seriously believe an alleged actor who claims that all of Hollywood is controlled by a Satanic, Jewish, Mossad conspiracy?

I thought not.

The PURPOSE OF DISINFO is to POISON THE GOOD INFO, i.e., the whole Trump/Q message.

I DO believe in Pizzagate, but this #Hollywood-anon OFFERS NO EVIDENCE. (Pizzagate has LOTS of evidence, starting with the Podesta emails on Wikileaks and the in-your-face pedo symbolism eerywhere, sick “art” and public Satanic practices!)

I think that especially in Q’s silent period, we are being FLOODED BY DISINFO by our ENEMIES.

“Disinformation is real”—Q’s last message to us at present.

Think of it this way.

"Everyone knew".

If you were normal, and knew what (who) Weinstein was doing (and how), you'd have led the charge with pitchforks & torches.

But "everyone knew" -- and nobody did anything.

Consider the website crazydaysandnights and its little reveal about Don Henley of the Eagles.

Nobody did anything.

Then go read up on that sex cult (not NXIVM, the *other* one, the one Gwyneth Paltrow was a member of, the one that cost $75,000/yr to belong to).

People knew.

Nobody did anything. If it's only a couple of bad apples, and they do not have dictatorial power...they can't intimidate *everyone*.

Ergo, a LOT o people were involved. Food for thought: Quick, name five movies in the last couple of years which promoted healthy relationships instead of sewer-filth.

BZZZZZT.

I agree we need to check information sources carefully. For example, I believe ‘R’ Anon who posed as JFK Jr. on 8chan is an obvious disinformation campaign. So far we have nothing to verify the accuracy of most of Renegade’s assertions. With Q, we had sources to verify.

The panic in Hollywood sounds right, the assertions that there is MUCH depravity there - well I’ve heard that before and the movies have become a debased product of a debased industry.

Q has said that there is pedo in Hollywood and I’ve seen research by Liz Crokin and others which supports that - but what is the point of naming names without any evidence? Okay, it can lead to investigation, but I’d like to see the results of investigation before statements as to who is guilty, who is evil are made.

So Renegade says he’s reporting corruption from a corrupt industry - it’s appropriate to look for evidence implicating specific individuals and not accept Anon assertion alone. None of the information he provided about himself has been proven, nor that of his motives for doing so, his disregard for being personally identified etc. is of concern. Is it that he has no reason to fear or that he is being reckless with his safety? I am concerned by his assertions, but I am not convinced by accusations against people he may or may not like, against whom he may hold a grudge etc. I haven’t read all of his posts; I have read many.

If he comes through with usable evidence, may God bless and protect him for trying to supply the truth. He did blurt out something about schools on the border is compatible with other content we’ve encountered. He may be trying to help, but when it comes to specific players in Hollywood, is he repeating baseless rumors he’s heard? Who knows. Too soon. I welcome any anyone who fights to bring light to the darkness; I just don’t have proof he’s one of them.

"I think that especially in Q’s silent period, we are being FLOODED BY DISINFO by our ENEMIES."

“Disinformation is real”—Q’s last message to us at present.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Healthy -- and tactically sound -- attitude, IMHO...

TXnMA

Do we seriously believe an alleged actor who claims that all of Hollywood is controlled by a Satanic, Jewish, Mossad conspiracy?

Besides all that, I got a softly pinging alarm from the conflicting personal info. HR (curious initials BTW) can't reveal himself, ostensibly to protect passive income streams, but states he was pals with Redd Foxx, he was big in the '80s, he'll be wearing green socks at the Grammy's (c'mon, really?), etc.

This might have been spouted just to divide the attention of the anons because surely some will try to assemble these pieces into a name.

Color me skeptical.