I agree we need to check information sources carefully. For example, I believe ‘R’ Anon who posed as JFK Jr. on 8chan is an obvious disinformation campaign. So far we have nothing to verify the accuracy of most of Renegade’s assertions. With Q, we had sources to verify.
The panic in Hollywood sounds right, the assertions that there is MUCH depravity there - well I’ve heard that before and the movies have become a debased product of a debased industry.
Q has said that there is pedo in Hollywood and I’ve seen research by Liz Crokin and others which supports that - but what is the point of naming names without any evidence? Okay, it can lead to investigation, but I’d like to see the results of investigation before statements as to who is guilty, who is evil are made.
So Renegade says he’s reporting corruption from a corrupt industry - it’s appropriate to look for evidence implicating specific individuals and not accept Anon assertion alone. None of the information he provided about himself has been proven, nor that of his motives for doing so, his disregard for being personally identified etc. is of concern. Is it that he has no reason to fear or that he is being reckless with his safety? I am concerned by his assertions, but I am not convinced by accusations against people he may or may not like, against whom he may hold a grudge etc. I haven’t read all of his posts; I have read many.
If he comes through with usable evidence, may God bless and protect him for trying to supply the truth. He did blurt out something about schools on the border is compatible with other content we’ve encountered. He may be trying to help, but when it comes to specific players in Hollywood, is he repeating baseless rumors he’s heard? Who knows. Too soon. I welcome any anyone who fights to bring light to the darkness; I just don’t have proof he’s one of them.
The following are notes I took while watching a July 23 video from Youtube’s Citizen’s Investigative Report titled:
QAnon - 2016 FISA App Released...Here we go...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYVw6lFa2Dw
Notes from the linked video
Carter Page was an FBI cooperating asset in 2013 Burykov case, and remained the primary FBI witness through May of 2016. As an FBI paid asset and witness (he wore a wire), Page was responsible for the bust of a high level Russian agent in 2013 through May of 2016. Months later, Page is put under a FISA warrant as an alleged Russian agent. The FBI never really care about Page, they just needed someone for their FISA cover.
The assistant attorney general during the Burykov case, John Carlin, (DOJ head of the National Security Division) worked with the FBI counterintelligence unit to conscript Carter Page as an FBI (asset) witness and gained a guilty plea in that case; six months later they stated their star witness was a Russian spy, but they never arrested him. Once the FISA warrant against Page was secured, Carlin resigned. Did he resign in protest or had he completed a larger purpose?
(28:00 min video timestamp): Q drop #436 (Dec 22, 2017) is the story of the FISA. Below the second mention of Hussein, FISA [2] means two FISA warrants, presidential daily briefing (she notes we still need to have that released), McCain shops Dossier to Buzzfeed, etc. Bottom of that drop lists the people whom the FBI was spying on under the cover of the FISA. This is what Admiral Rogers discovered.
The FISA was probably applied retroactively as cover for spying on Trump. The initiating information came from the State Department and the “instigator” was Clapper. “Crossfire Hurricane” start date of 7/31/16 was NOT the true beginning date. Spying on Trump began 4 months earlier in March. The redacted FISA claims the supporting information was verified as required but Comey and McCabe testified under oath to the contrary. Comey and Yates attested to pages 63 and 65 and are therefore in violation of 18USC1018, felonious false attestation by federal officials. Despite redactions, the FISA still reveals basic illegality of participants.
Senator Devin Nunes wrote a request dated March 15, for a copy of the FISA report. The copy of the redacted FISA delivered was dated March 17th 2017, but this date is not the application date or the date of any required renewal dates and is not in the relevant time frame to correctly represent the Oct. 2016 application. Why is the redacted FISA given to Nunes dated March 17, 2017? (ransomnote: I am confused on the date of the report issue)
(35:42 min Video timestamp) A few days later, in a video clip dated March 22, 2017, Senator Devin Nunes says of the FISA report,
“ I recently confirmed that on numerous
occasions the intelligence community
incidentally collected information about
US citizens involved in the Trump
transition details about us persons
associated with the incoming
administration details with little or no
apparent foreign intelligence value were
widely disseminated in intelligence
community reporting third I have
confirmed that additional names of Trump
transition team members were unmasked
and fourth and finally I want to be
clear none of this surveillance was
related to Russia or the investigation
of Russian activities or of the Trump
team”
She notes the phrase, “with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated.”
It was Ezra Cohen Watkins who told Devin Nunes about it in the first place. The copy Nunes reviewed, was the October 2016 original but it was a March 17, 2013 copy of that report. Q told us to keep our eye on Ezra Cohen Watkins because he was fired by McMaster when Trump didn’t want that to happen. He was fired because he was a Flynn appointee; he came back and is national security adviser and counsel for Jeff Sessions. Watkins has a role to play later.
Leakers on both the house and senate Intelligence Committee. Mr. Wolf was the leaker for the Senate Intelligence Committee which means the IC is completely corrupt. Wolf leaked something right around this time to Ally Watkins (the reporter). The video blogger believes this (March 17) copy was the one sent over to the House at the same time they acted like they hadn’t seen it. Actually they didn’t say what they received, it was just “something was released” (more about this later - it’s all connected).
42:00 mark Ristovan says that the State Department initiated the investigation; he’s saying Nunes is correct. Why? Because Nunes (must have) seen the unredacted report already.
The video blogger thinks they will arrest Page now (playfully says, “How much you wanna bet?”)
43:37 mark, the video displays the culprits in the State Department who initiated the investigation. Photographs displayed of Elizabeth Dibble, Jonathan Finer, Colin Kahl, Kathleen Kavalec, Lewis Lukens, Shailagh Murray, Victoria Nuland, Jake Sullivan, Jonathan Winer, Thomas Williams. The instigator was ODNI James Clapper. Says the funny thing is James Clapper didn’t even know he was in the FISA application because he is a complete doofus and the people running the FISA fraud scheme didn’t want him to actually be part of it.
Rosenstein and McCabe filed a renewal of the FISA one month ahead of schedule, probably because of the IG investigation which revealed the Strzok texts, they realized bad news was inbound and they didn’t want it to disrupt the “insurance plan.”
____________
Ransomnote: I had a hard time following in some parts. The discussion about Watkins to “come later” is not in this episode, she’s creating a follow up video to this one.
1) one does not 'name names' against people so connected, rich, and powerful unless (choose one)
a) one is totally nuts
b) one is on a suicide mission
c) it is simpy true
He doesn't *sound* nuts; he sounds like he is calling out the weaponized autists on an *offensive* (as in, not "de"-fensive, not as in "rude and ill-mannered") mission of seek-and-destroy.
If so, this must mean (given all of Q's hints) we are near the end-game.
From Ransomnote:
>>None of the information he provided about himself has been proven, nor that of his motives for doing so, his disregard for being personally identified etc. is of concern.<<
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We are in agreement, of course.
There is another point that I failed to make which I believe is essential: This “Hollywood-anon” is try to graft a anti-Jew narrative onto Q. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE DS IS ALWAYS TRYING TO DO—in order to DISCREDIT ALL OF US, including POTUS and Q, as FASCISTS.
IN SUMMARY: “Hollywood-anon” is most likely a DS attack.