[CondoleezzaProtege]

Written a year ago but still relevant. David Satter's life's work revolves around the inner workings of Post-Soviet Russia, and he explains the motives and rationale behind the meddling, which would have taken place regardless of who the candidates were. (Also worth noting how the American government's own behavior differs or compares.)

[CondoleezzaProtege]

he explains the motives and rationale behind the meddling... - not here but in lectures and other writings of his.

[bgill]

yes

[jmaroneps37]

Yes and it ALWAYS has been.

[redhead]

They have to ASK??

[Boomer]

Of course it’s under covered; it doesn’t go with the leftist MSM propaganda narrative they nurture and coddle like a weak little sapling as they hope it grows into a great big oak tree.

It never will of course. Everyone knows all successful trees (stories) have good foundational roots. The leftist narrative never did and never will. All based on lies and innuendo.

[ETL]

Of course it is. All the evidence points to DemRat collusion with Moscow. From Comrade Obama’s promised (and delivered) “flexibility” on missile defense and nukes to Hillary handing the Russians 20% of our uranium production. This plus the fact that the DemRats are the weak on defense party. Obama (intentionally) attempted to cripple us militarily, as he helped build up theirs.

[DarthVader]

Yes!