This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
"Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?"
The following video (13 min.) is by far the most popular FReeper recommended source of information for those new to Q Anon.
Q - The Plan To Save The World
The following is an excellent overview written by sundance at Conservative Tree House.
Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency…
The following video (4 min.) provides a very quick overview.
Who is Q - video available on Youtube
FReeper reviewers have given the following PDF a thumbs-up.
The Book of Q (PDF)
Finding and Understanding Q Drops
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on a few different verified websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyberattack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops sometime use unfamiliar acronyms, references, names and locations of significance. Swordmaker maintains a list of these terms to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list, called the LexiQon, is stored on Swordmaker's profile page, and he posts the latest updates within the threads. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Click on the silver 'Q' below to view Swordmaker's LexiQon of Q drop terms.
QProofs provide evidence that Q Anon is a legitimate source of information, has access to President Trump, and is serving President Trump's agenda:
https://www.qproofs.com/home.html
To find Q Anon threads on Free Republic, search for key word "Qanon" using the search window in the top right corner of the forum.
Finding Q discussions and analyses on the web
I will be compiling the recommendations FReepers have sent me regarding good sources of reliable Q information on the web. Here's a few links to get started.
Praying Medic a good source for concise video reviews of Q drops:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic has two videos for beginners. I haven't watched them yet, so if you do, please FReepmail me to share any insights you have:
Q For Beginners Part 1 - Who is Q? (5 min.)
Q For Beginners Part 2 - How to Find Q posts (10 min.)
Praying Medic also has a Twitter account:
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic
Dustin Nemos is a long-time favorite of mine. He covers other content (e.g., bitcoin) so I recommend you check the titles for topics of interest. He usually includes a few overview statements on the thumbnail to his videos to give you an idea of the Q content being covered. I really appreciate the links he posts beneath his videos. His content is very good, so Youtube banned him for three months. However, he's returned to youtube and you can find his channel, Nemos V, here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ7VgW7XgJQjDEPnOR-Q0Qw
The following is Nemos' video for those new to the effort to awaken the public to the truth and stop the Deep State from destroying our country. He zips through a wealth of visual content (39 min) - the viewer can pause the video to inspect links, articles and photos as needed. I haven't watched it yet so if you do, please FReepmail me to share any insights you have
Unhinged 2.0 - The Untold Story - Trump's Storm and the Great Awakening
ImperatorRex on Twitter has a solid fan base - he's so good he keeps being suspended. Hopefully, he's still posting here:
https://twitter.com/_ImperatorRex_
Some of the history behind The Swamp
Here's the U.S. 2015 Armed Forces video of President Reagan's stirring message about why We Must Fight
If you haven't seen it yet, here's President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as his comments about the press:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Resources for the way forward
Need a meme to help red-pill your friends and neighbors? Little Jeremiah has posted a thread and continues to invite us to post memes we find in one conveneient FR thread. Here's the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3648238/posts?page=297
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected:
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the following link to send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
Don't like what's going on in Congress right now? Call them right now and tell them (name, phone number and phone numbers of committees to which they belong):
https://www.contactingcongress.org
This thread post is under revision (updated information). Your patience is greatly appreciated.
(I think I got the attributions right, if not, my apologies, in any case they are merely a stepping off point for some speculation and analysis on my part - JB)
BAGSTERAny thoughts on this one guys? What role can the Military intelligence and NSA (or Q) play in the indictment thing?
My only thought is the gathering of intelligence for evidence in the criminal proceedings. Is there something else I'm not thinking about? And what does "BANG" mean. Pull the trigger or what?
MEADSJN: Suppose the crimes involved planning, plotting, fomenting, instigating, or some other form of active involvement in a plot to create a war, or nuclear war, or massive civil unrest, or an invasion, against the USA and its people.
Then suppose your nation's main investigative and law enforcement organizations were key players in such events, and such corruption, as well as key players in the legislative and judiciary, as well as former elected and appointed members of such groups.
Justice cannot come from such corrupted groups of people. Who then could the nation depend on to pursue justice against such powerful and inter-connected groups of criminals?
Only the military. After that, only We the People, and that would turn into a Bosnian scenario (times 1000) in a hurry.
No matter how much pre-release, softening up and eventually MSM coverage of Deep State wrong-doing is done by Q supporters, and the press, I don't think the widespread use of the military to effect the arrests of civilians would ever be considered anything other than a military coup by many (probably most) people in the United States. And I'm just talking about arrests.
The US Citizenry has a long standing antipathy to the US of the US Military in police actions. It was hated as far back as the Civil War when Lincoln did it. The resulting Posse Comitatus Act has been the law since 1878.
None the less, it is possible and has been done, rarely. The 1967 Detroit Riots were put down by active duty US Army troops (combined elements of 82nd and 101st Airborne), not the Michigan National Guard. (National Guard use in riots and disasters is un-exceptional)
Still I think most people would see a huge difference between using the Army as a last resort to end terrible riots and arson after the National Guard has failed, and using them to go house-to-house to arrest 30,000 civilians based on previously sealed indictments.
(For instance, imagine if Obama had sent the military out to round up "right wing terrorists" and arrested thousands of patriots based on some sort of pretext. Would you evaluate the evidence, or site Posse Comitatas, the Constitution, and long standing American tradition before calling for Rebellion)
Just thinking ahead here there would be three main vectors of resistance to the Counter-Coup if it was executed this way. They would be: the main-stream media, the Congress (particularly if in Democratic control, but likely either way) and the Federal Judiciay.
These are interlocking vectors of resistance. The press would call the President's actions unconstitional. Liberal Federal Judges (are their any other kind? not many, apparently) would quickly declare the actions illegal, and issue writs of habeas corpus. Of course Trump could order the military to ignore these, and suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus, as Lincoln did during the Civil War, but that would require or be the equivalent of claiming we are at war. And of course, when Lincoln did it the Congress passed a special act to give him that extraordinary power Habeas Corpos Suspension Act of 1863. Does anyone think that the Congress would give such an act to Trump?
So, in my estimation Trump would have to order the military to ignore Federal Courts, while simultaneously ignoring the Press largely calling him a usurper and the Congress working (even harder) to impeach him.
In such a situation would the military follow those orders? I think it's an open question, and probably at best you would have both pro and anti Counter-Coup troops, at all levels of the US Armed Forces.
And then, the next step that is being suggested, is that the "white hats" will take these tens of thousands of military detainees and tell us that they are not going to be tried in US Federal Courts, but rather by Military Commissions.
Even some of those who might have been convinced that the military arrests were a necessary expedient might have trouble with this announcement. The idea of the American citizens right to a "trail by a jury of your peers" is a deeply ingrained one.
In fact, as I've shown in my previous post: the history of the U.S. Military in running any sort of trials is abysmal.
Again you would have the three vectors going nuts: the Press telling the Judges what to do, the Judges telling the press what they've done and everyone in all three arenas calling for Trump's impeachment and removal (if not even more drastic measures like summary arrest by troops loyal to the Constitution). And they would have some pretty good rationale for those calls. After all:
A military tribunal is an inquisitorial system based on charges brought by military authorities, prosecuted by a military authority, judged by military officers, and sentenced by military officers against a member of an enemy army. And: The United States has made use of military tribunals or commissions, rather than rely on a court-martial, within the military justice system, during times of declared war or rebellion.
Subjecting citizens to such a regime is currently illegal under U.S. law, and is unlikely to gain any legitimacy in the eyes of most people after it occurs. Again, this is a long standing precedent:
The use of military tribunals in cases of civilians was often controversial (in the Civil War era), as tribunals represented a form of justice alien to the common law, which governs criminal justice in the United States, and provides for trial by jury, the presumption of innocence, forbids secret evidence, and provides for public proceedings. Critics of the Civil War military tribunals charged that they had become a political weapon, for which the accused had no legal recourse to the regularly constituted courts, and no recourse whatsoever except through an appeal to the President.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed, and unanimously ruled that military tribunals used to try civilians in any jurisdiction where the civil courts were functioning were unconstitutional, with its decision in Ex parte Milligan
Now, let's look at Q's most recent posting:
1664 Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8704f4 No.1991829 📁
Jul 1 2018 20:13:38 (EST)
There will be no civil war.
Coordinated MSM hysteria designed to instill fear - change narrative.
NK is NOT advancing their weapons program.
Coordinated MSM hysteria designed to instill fear - change narrative.
FAKE NEWS!
Q
If the plan is for the "white hats" to use the military to make mass arrests and then conduct military tribunals in place of civilian trials then I don't think Q can guarantee us "no Civil War".
And whatever one thinks of Q and his posts, he's never claimed to be prophet with the ability to see the future, so I won't credit him with that ability either.
The idea of 30,000 arrests with some, many or all being made by the military and those detained put to military tribunals for judgement is so far outside the boundaries of American law, precedent and history that truly no one could say what the final outcome of such a bold move would be.
To be clear, this is only my opinion, based on some of the major themes I've seen put forward by Q and his interpreters.
One reason I remain skeptical about this course of action is it seems completely at odds with Trump, who shows an admirable patience in dealing with even the most spurious claims by Federal Judges, allowing, for instance, his travel ban to make it's way to the Supreme Court. There were other actions he could have taken, but he took the most conservative and conventional.
Under the "Military Commissions Scenario" I think he would have to silence the role of the Federal Judges at the initiation. They are probably the only one of the three vectors he can try to sideline without even worse blowback.
Turning off even obnoxious media like CNN would be viewed very dimly by most Americans, we do appreciate our first Amendment.
Dismissing Congress would be even worse. It is an unthinkable violation of the Constitution and clearly mark the end of the Republic, even if it was intended to save it.
So, I rate any of those extremely unlikely, and pretty bad as an idea.
And of course Q has recently promised us "no Civil War". To make that promise I adduce that he is NOT part of a cabal that is planning for the imminent widespread use of the military to arrest and bring to trial corrupt people in our government and other institutions. Because if he were he would know that Civil War is distinct possibility in the aftermath to such actions.
Instead: more OIG reports, and no military arrests. This seems like both the prudent and likely plan.
CHEERS!
@WiredSources Following Following @WiredSources More JUST IN: BuzzFeed claims the FBI leaked to them documents they obtained in raid on Michael Cohen's apartment
