Leaders and dignitaries of the European Union; representatives of our NATO Alliance; distinguished guests: We meet here at a moment of testing for Europe and the United States, and for the international order that we have worked for generations to build.Throughout human history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to organize themselves, the proper relationship between the individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of struggle -- through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution -- that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men -- and women -- are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested -- here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that individual identity must be defined by "us" versus "them," or that national greatness must flow not by what a people stand for, but by what they are against.
Sounds incomplete. The clip and this could be damning but I would like to see the rest of his speech. I don’t doubt he believes what this represents. But what else did he say?
Sounds like (facetiously) zero is actually defending the FFs. I’m not getting the outrage...
If what you have pasted here is really what he said and not as presented in the video then someone did one hell of a good job of audio cut and paste editing.
To the point that I think the video is right and the text released to the public was the fake.
Then again - I don’t know of any Bilderburger speeches/discussions that have ever been captured on video or audio before.
“This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs,”
Hillary actually said this in a campaign speech. She said something apologetic while saying that people don’t know what’s best when spending money so (paraphrasing) “We have to take it away from you and redistribute it.” She said it as if she was saying, “We have to make you eat your vegetables.”
Obama supports the New World Order while giving speeches that make the New World Order sound egalitarian. Perhaps that’s going to be the cover story for the Order - “we have to take your country’s sovereign status away from it because you deserve to be free of it. All of us will participate in one world “egalitarian” government together.”
The Doublespeak of the NWO = National Sovereignty is Oppression / New World Order is Freedom.
Thank you for showing this text.
If the text is correct, the snippet shown in the video is a LIE.
Did Q spread a LIE deliberately?
What’s going on?
Thanks very much for posting your clip to allow analysis and investigation!
Cboldt, Thank you for posting. (Really!)
What did Alinsky say...hold them to their own standards?
Bagster nails it in his later post, we are not supposed to look at this out of context comment, but as the preceding comment that Obama appears to affirm. Misdirection to get the press all up in arms about the “misquote”.
Q is contrasting the attitude of 7th floor DSrs toward the people, the ignorant swine who voted for Trump, and the words of Obama who they follow and support, for whom they willingly violate the law and their oaths of office to now protect, and to oppose the will of the people in electing Trump as President in accordance with the Constitution containing the ideals Obama appears to support:
“...a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding.”
Irony—BHO people talk high ideals and practice the tyranny that BHO appears to praise.
Now I go out to go exercise freedom in choosing a grocery store! (In a land where bread waits for the customer!)