Posted on 06/11/2018 12:11:22 AM PDT by ransomnote
This excellent photo was taken by Jesco Denzel, a German government photographer.
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
Wouldn’t it be be just like the evil witches to never let a crisis go to waste even when you caused it..
these people are sick...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Seth_Rich
Aftermath
On the day after the shooting, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz issued a statement mourning his loss and praising Rich’s work to support voter rights. Two days after the shooting, Hillary Clinton spoke of his death during a speech advocating limiting the availability of guns.
Not aware of any response from the mullahs but I think he was speaking more to the people of Iran.
Date? Time? Location?
The recent news was Seth’s family lawyer trying to supeona evidence from JA, right?
bookmark
Well posted, KUDOS.
You: Blah, blah, blah, blah.
Me: STFU.
Response B:
People here have admitted that this is a religious belief for them.
It's bad form to start your propaganda off with a lie, Jack.
Me: Cause we're ignorant sheep and cultists Jack?
You: I don't say that.
No, Jack. You pointed at it.
Sorry if that cuts a little too close to the bone for comfort, Bagster.
Apology not accepted.
You are the one who claimed to be "the lesser oracle", not me.
I am no longer the Lesser Oracle. I am now "Our" Resident Guru of Q. Or hadn't you heard. Also, what's this "our". Do you name yourself a FReeQ now? I'm gonna have so see your papers, fella.
You are the one who bragged only a few posts ago that "My powers are vast and beyond your comprehension.
There was no sarcasm involved in that line, goodman. My powers ARE vast and beyond your comprehension. My gung fu is impenetrable and all-powerful. Do you notice how you are now outed as the anti-Q troll that you are? You had been pretending to be contributing to the thread for several days now, what with your stupid charts and pondering on the meaning of life and all things Q in a contemplative manner.
I chose to play along with your game and expose you. All I had to do was answer your pretend ignorant questions and then I asked you, on the last thread, if you trusted the plan. I knew what would happen, and here we are. The Penguin is revealed.
I've asked a you, as my main protagonist here,
Well, don't I feel special. But seriously, lighten up Francis. You take yourself WAY too seriously.
a few simple questions. I posted them on the previous thread, and I posted them on this thread. But still, no answers.
Honestly, Jack. If I thought your fake questions were in the least bit sincere, that you even had a shred of honesty in your inquiries, I would MAYBE entertain you. Like I did with another poster earlier today. But I know what you're about and I won't play. Out of one side of your neck, you say you don't know what the plan is, and out of the other, you tell us what it is.
You have a strange knowledge of your cherry picked Q posts and "predictions" while claiming ignorance of it all. Nukka, please.
In addition, why would I cozy up and take a "protagonist" under my wing, me being a guru of Q and all. My acolyte entourage currently has no vacancies. Have your people submit a resume to my people.
You prefer to toss out rude littel asides and you keep on with ad-hominum attacks.
Actually, and in all honesty, I was pretty cool to you while I was pretending to fall for your false sincerity. There were no so called ad hominems and if you say there was I will name you liar.
but on occasion I have fallen short of my goals on that.
You are THAT close to being the perfect man, Jack. Admirable.
In a formal debate, points are deducted for attacking the speaker and not the topic.
Please don't make the mistake that I care about your formal debate rules. This is obviously not a formal debate, as you point out. In fact, this thread is not about debating the veracity of Q, as you seem intent on doing. Over and over again. We are here to debate the meaning of Q's posts and reach consensus through interaction, research, and analysis. Talking to you is a complete waste of time and I won't continue much longer. We have important things to discuss here, and you are a distraction.
Perhaps there are others who are pilgrims on the journey...
Did you really just say that? Really???
I am trying to act a bridge, not a roadblock, to understanding. Starting with MY OWN.
And just as you started your propaganda with a lie, you end it with another. As the pilgrim who wonders the desert sees things that are false, lo he learns to speak contrary to the truth. (two can play this game, Jack).
Sincerely,
Your main protagonist and "our" Guru of Q.
Bagster
the last ‘news’ article I saw was this:
http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/21/media/seth-rich-brad-bauman-lawsuit/index.html
I have seen speculation that Rich was the wikileaks source but no confirmation
I was hoping it might be a fairly recent photo, I was thinking he might still alive. Rats.
I don't know about the rest of the country, but some places in CA, like here, have year round school. At least they used to when my whippersnappers went.
Bagster
Also keeping in mind that President Donald J. Trump was a billionaire before taking a government job: unlike Hillary and Oboema, who saw government service as a way to get rich without earning it honestly.
Nice! 🛸
23 is 11pm, military.
Singapore is 12 hours ahead of wash dc.
But you *are* one.
Noting again the saccharine, "Who? ME?" when you are exposed, Gríma.
Hutchins I can agree is possible, but why Cobain? Thanks
Ahahahahahahahahaha.
Marry me.
Bagster
:)
Second in command. Maybe not family but a love interest for the one of the girls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.