Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/11/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This excellent photo was taken by Jesco Denzel, a German government photographer.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[TEXOKIE]

Bagster wrote on the last thread:

“Every single picture posted is ORIGINAL.
Pulled/Wiped or Taken.
Think about what that means.”

It means all Q pic posts are either pulled from surveillance cameras (i.e. London traffic cams/Epstein security cams) retrieved from “wiped” sources, or taken directly with cameras by people.

I think, at the very least, it means that Q is not a larp or a squad of 8chan nerds who wouldn’t have access to the pics like NSA humint would. Proof of Q?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Does this include early pictures from the Asia trip from the Airplane? I thought those were proofs of Q’s proximity to POTUS?

[TEXOKIE]

I’m bringing this also over from the previous thread:

#FLY[RR]FLY#
Failure per WH instruction / agreement.
DECLAS_Public[3]
EO dated_official
IG redactions [heavy+][remove]
Hussein [WH [call] [tarmac] BC/LL] #RR#...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
My first reading had me thinking that it was RR’s disobedience to DJT....

Am wondering now what would it mean if “Failure per WH instruction/agreement” could refer to Hussein’s previous instructions? That RR has been trying to follow those, but is losing heart in doing them and ready to disobey THAT WH in favor of current WH? Or could that be an admonition, “pursuing your present course is a failure wrt your WH instruction/agreement with previous administration?”

Could he still have the opportunity to “fly” - to somehow survive this ordeal? Could the bottom quote, “You have a choice. Do what is right.” be RR’s final opportunity to make that break with his previous contract with previous WH?

Not married to this idea, just wondering and throwing it out there - It’s what we do!

[mairdie]

>>Will The Donald fire RR for breaking his deal on releasing info? I’m thinking a strong maybe is indicated.:)

YES!!!!!!!!!!! Exactly what I’m thinking.

Congress threatened impeachment if Trump fired RR, but he would be doing it in SUPPORT of Congress, so how can they object? Well, they can, but only the crazy ones and it won’t lead to support for the whole Congress really doing impeachment.

Wonderful summary, Bagster.

[TEXOKIE]

Am giggling at the word order on the German Merkle’s speech balloon!

(Germans noted for inverted word order such as throw the horse over the fence some hay.)

“What Frick The???” is reminiscent and suggestive of that inverted word order.

[Snowybear]

I’m trying to figure this out. So your position is that Lewis Arthur and all of his claims are legitmate?

[Cats Pajamas]

Holy crap. I decide to sleep eight hours and go grocery shopping this morning and all HELL breaks loose. I need to get a Qalarm or something. Gotta catch up I got last thread to read and message mail. Holy crap. I have become the White Rabbit, I’m late, I’m late for a very important date.

[Disestablishmentarian]

I’m wondering if BW is protecting Kim, who is always at risk for assassination or coup, especially when he sets foot out of NK.

If Kim is actually going to strike a deal, maybe even for re-unification of Korea, there are those who would prefer him terminated with extreme prejudice.

[meyer]

Q post 1449...
(also includes a picture of that big swimming pool, I think, that sits atop a hotel)

No. 72
Where was Kim tonight?
How was this known?
You are watching a ‘plan’ being set in motion.
Enjoy the show.
Q

[Snowybear]

Arthur isn’t new on the scene. He’s been around before.

https://voat.co/v/politics/2575747

[Snowybear]

Oh and there’s more on Arthur.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8omzhk/who_is_lewis_arthur_the_man_in_the_vop_videos_who/

[meyer]

[bagster]

Claim that children were on site: false
Knife found: false.
Skeleton found at site: false. 20 miles away.
Shallow grave: false.
No investigation: false.
Many other claims: false.

Never heard that children were found at site. That point is irrelevant anyway. Never heard about a knife being found. Also, irrelevant. A body was found twenty miles away, as your guy admits. Was it a child's body? Was it along the route that would be the supposed "pipeline?"

A shallow grave isn't a grave unless a body or evidence of a body is found in it. What does that even mean? I already addressed the "two hour" local l.e. investigation the guy himself talked about. Your guy himself admits that it was "more than a homeless camp." What does that MEAN? And why doesn't he say why he thinks that? What is he not talking about? And why is he not talking about it?

He seems very eager to debunk this site and what it looks like. I agree with him that it looks like "more than a homeless camp."

And what of the property owners and their ties?

You and your guy don't address any of these issues, and blatantly so. Why? Explain the toys and furniture found in the hole in the ground. Explain the restraints found on the trees.

Believe what you want.

Thank you for your kind permission.

Was this a child trafficking site? Perhaps it was but the entire thing was overblown by a group and a person with VERY suspicious ties.

You concede that it was "perhaps" a child trafficking site but that it was "overblown." How can that be overblown?"

And as far as suspicious ties go, who cares who brings it to light. I'm more concerned about CEMEX and their suspicious ties. What say you, pouncer?

Bagster

[No_Doll_i]

NEW Q

#1449

Q !CbboFOtcZs #103📁

Jun 11 2018 10:26:18 (EST)

MBS_KIM1.png

MBS_KIM2.png

No. 72
Where was Kim tonight?
How was this known?
You are watching a 'plan' being set in motion.
Enjoy the show.
Q

[meyer]

[meyer]

Thanks, No Doll I - you did the post in a much, MUCH better format than I. And you fit it all in one post. :)

[Disestablishmentarian]

A worthy effort, Bags.

I am somewhat of a weekend warrior on these threads because of work ... especially when things are moving fast ... so appreciate your summaries along with those of Swordmaker and others.

[Cats Pajamas]

Clinton Administration fired Mr. Jeff Sessions. Precedent: Right After 1992 Election Bill Clinton Fired U.S. Attorney Jeff Sessions

[bagster]

Does this include early pictures from the Asia trip from the Airplane? I thought those were proofs of Q’s proximity to POTUS?

I think in this case, Q is pointing to the pics as an additional "proof of Q." I also think he's not only referring to these pics but a lot of his past pics. I also think there is more than one message in that post, as others have theorized.

I'm partial to "proofs of Q" theories.

Bagster