Posted on 06/08/2018 11:27:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
You said it better than I did.
I’ve been wondering about that as well. What kind of decision would require the assent of both the President and Vice President?
See my post #494. I dont believe Ryan was on that plane either.
Maybe not a decision, but some kind of signal. It certainly showed they are on the same page.
Speculation???? They were bagging others who leaked secret info during that six months.
>>I believe any possible recording and/or further reporting of what took place on the plane, etc., will be part of IG report on 6/14<<
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I see your logic. If the recording exists, there would be no justification for withholding it from the IG, especially since the question has been extensively discussed in multiple Internet forums, courtesy of Q!
If it is as Q says, offering a SCOTUS position in return for obstructing justice, then there is no defense possible. Lynch would be GUILTY for not immediately arresting both Clintons (even without discussion of AS 187)
Lynch has been relatively QUIET—as if she knows she will be standing trial.
This would be a Nuclear BOOM.
thanx for posting these two articles.
first I’ve seen um.
[OWL], once and for all..
i believe the answer is in that it relates to Russia gate and catching more of the conspirators.
Watkins broke the Carter Page angle of the Russia investigation back in April 2017 with a story called A Former Trump Adviser Met With A Russian Spy. In it, Watkins claimed, The revelation of Pages connection to Russian intelligence which occurred more than three years before his association with Trump is the most clearly documented contact to date between Russian intelligence and someone in Trumps orbit.
Best scene? What about the calf?
It's hard for me to believe they are going to go after any news organizations. The Press is not exempt from secrecy laws, but they are given a lot of leeway.
The one case where Nixon tried to prevent the NY Times from printing the Pentagon Papers, he lost. (Amazing, horrible decision, IMHO, but still it happened.
If the DOJ starts arresting reporters for merely accepting tips then the story will flip 180* from "what this leaker did was wrong" to "see, Trump is trying to censor and shut-down the press".
Another thing is that the classification on this stuff was just reflexive. The thing the revealed was that Carter Page was going to be testifying to the SSCI. That's not much of a state secret when you get down to it.
I don't think even I (who hate these tard reporters) would approve of arresting a reporter for reporting that.
So, no, I don't think they took a bunch of times to figure out who else in ABC, NBC, CNN and the New York Times were involved, because they knew from the get-go it was too trivial a "secret" to try to bring any case against reporters and newspapers.
The Pentagon Papers decision said "the Government can not use prior-restraint to prevent publication of things they don't like". So the NY Times published legit top-secret stuff about our war effort, in THE MIDDLE OF THE WAR.
Even so, Nixon never sought to prosecute anyone at the Times or Post after the fact. Given all that I just can't believe the newsies are the targets.
You might check out Rice University - their nickname is the Owls. Also the infamous University of Texas tower.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I can’t take credit for the pix, ichabod, that was all on our dear FRiend, Cats Pajamsa!
I’ve seen those OWL Tower pix before - quite an effect!
HOWEVER that is true about Rice U and its OWL connections.
I had not thought about the origins of Rice U in a while. I have a close relative who attended there. The average Rice fan, I suppose, only thinks of the owl in its more benign aspects of “Wisdom” etc. And certainly that symbol DOES contain that quality. You have made me curious, so into the bunny hole I go seeking the skullduggery of those Wiley Rascally Wabbits.....and OWLs!!
Mr. Rice, the founder, apparently was an elitist, and in his will he specified that no black people could attend. Married women were also frowned on. They relaxed that during WWII. After he died, they set about breaking that will and were successful... as well they should be! [This story is from what my relative told me - not from their web site!]
Their web site:
http://www.rice.edu
The Rice shield has 3 owls.
“ Rice Academic Seal and Logo Rice Academic Seal
The academic seal of Rice University was designed in 1912 by Mr. Pierre de Chaignon la Rose of Cambridge, Massachusetts,*** who combined the main elements of the arms of sixteen prominent families bearing the names “Rice” or “Houston.” Owls of Athena-symbolic of wisdom-were chosen for the charges. The Athenian owls on the Rice seal were patterned after a design found on a small, silver tetradrachmenon coin dating from the middle of the fifth century B.C. And because Rice University was dedicated by its founder to the advancement of “letters, science, and art,” these words also were incorporated into the seal.”
http://explore.rice.edu/uploadedImages/Explore/Welcome_to_Rice/riceacademicseal1.jpg
Mr. Rice appears to have been an equal opportunity “Free Trader” during the Late Unpleasantness Between the States:
Rice Colors: Blue and Gray
“In 1912, Rice’s first president, Edgar Odell Lovett****, chose as the school colors “a blue still deeper than the Oxford blue” and “the Confederate gray, enlivened by a tinge of lavender.” It has been suggested that blue and gray were chosen in recognition of the fact that Rice’s founder amassed much of the fortune that formed the initial endowment of the Rice Institute by trading with both the North and the South during the Civil War.”
William Marsh Rice
On May 18, 1891, Massachusetts-born businessman William Marsh Rice chartered the William Marsh Rice Institute for the Advancement of Literature, Science, and Art as a gift to the city of Houston, where he made his fortune. The terms of the charter required that work on the new institute would begin only after Rice’s death.”
Mascot - Owl
Rice Mascot: Owl
When athletic activities began at the Rice Institute in 1912, the teams adopted as their mascot the owl from the Rice seal. Over the years, Rice’s various mascots have included students dressed in owl costumes, live Great Horned Owls, and large owl statues of fiberglass and of canvas, the latter being particularly famous in Rice lore (see below).
Mascot Name: “Sammy”
“An early symbol of Rice’s athletic teams was large canvas owl, a tempting target for the Institute’s rivals. In 1917, when students from Southwest Conference football rival Texas A&M kidnapped the owl, Rice students pooled their resources and hired a private detective to go to College Station to find the missing mascot. When the detective, having recovered the owl, sent a coded telegram to Houston that read “Sammy is fairly well and would like to see his parents at eleven o’clock,” the Rice mascot had a name.”
The MOB - Rice University’s Marching Owl Band
***Mr Rose:
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1941/3/18/faculty-profile-pthis-last-year-was/
Was apparently a Harvard alum and on faculty
“...Pierre la Rose (some say it was originally Peter Ross) had a vocation—heraldry. His ability and knowledge were of the first order, and his consequent reputation was international. He made the heraldic designs for the Houses, for the Tercentenary, for Radcliffe and Yale and Princeton buildings. He was a devout Roman Catholic and an authority on ecclesiastical emblazonings. He was proud of an ancient French lineage, and his walls were hung with old family portraits....”
Also a bachelor.
From WIKI
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_de_Chaignon_la_Rose
Pierre de Chaignon la Rose was born on April 23, 1871 in New York City, New York.[1] His father was an A. F. de Chaignon la Rose, and his mother Katharine Kappus von Pichlstein.[1] It was rumored by some at Harvard, however, that the French surname was merely a pretense, and that his name was originally Peter Ross.[2]
La Rose studied at Exeter Academy and subsequently Harvard University, from which he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in 1895.[1][2] He was a member of Phi Beta Kappa, supposedly “without ever taking a single lecture-note”.[2] He also served as editor of the Harvard Monthly, and was a member of Hasty Pudding and Signet.[2] His roommate at Harvard was Daniel Gregory Mason, who described him in the following terms:
The official seal of Saint Anselm College incorporates La Rose’s design
Of all my friends he had the surest nose for the best, whether in letters, music, the graphic arts, or the more general arts of life ... His style in college essays and stories was fairly Jamesian. He could draw exquisite book-plates. As for his piano-playing, I can see him yet at our upright, stocky but erect in shirt-sleeves and red hair ...[3]
He taught at Harvard in the English department for seven years following his graduation, resigning his teaching post in 1902.[1][4] By 1915, La Rose would describe his occupation as a “man of letters”, busying himself with critical literary work and graphic design while making trips to Europe, Mexico, and Turkey.[1]
A fervent Catholic, La Rose was an expert on ecclesiastical heraldry,[2] and designed the coats of arms of many American Catholic prelates.[5] He also designed arms for institutions both Catholic and secular, including The Catholic University of America[6], Saint Anselm College and Rice University.[7] For example, he designed the seals of all the graduate schools at Harvard University and served on its Committee on Arms, Seal, and Diplomas, while also designing armorial bearings for Princeton, Yale, and Radcliffe College.[2][8]
He was a friend of historian George Santayana.
****
Edgar Odell Lovett (April 14, 1871 August 13, 1957) was an American educator and education administrator.
He was the first president of Rice Institute (now Rice University) in Houston, Texas. Lovett was RECOMMENDED TO THE POST BY WOODROW WILSON, then president of Princeton University.
[BOOMlette!! I found out more than you wanted to know, and certainly more than I wanted to know too! LOL! But connection to the globalists in my book, is confirmed. Now I gotta scramble to catch up again!]
Yeah, so if you accept my premise that the FBI & DOJ aren't going to prosecute newspapers, TV networks or their reporters over a low-level leak like this, then the other conspirators have to be other people in the Government.
And that gets really interesting. If he was the leaker was he acting on his own? Or was he doing the bidding of some (or, even all) of the SSCI?
The material being leaked was Executive Branch material. The SSCI can't arbitrarily decide to de-classify a lot of it. Were some of the members of the SSCI co-conspirators?
Here are the current members. Membership might have been slightly different prior to Jan 2017, when some of the leaking was taking place.
I think you've nailed the situation perfectly. I know if the people bashing Sessions looked into his past as a prosecuter they would see a much different picture than what Mueller, Comey et al have demonstrated. Even without having a Q clue (Qlue?) to "trust Sessions" a bit of research shows him to be a hard worker who gets the work done prior to the indictment. His history is not that of a slacker or a showman.
President Trump is a great worker also but a great showman as well. I think some enjoy the showy aspect of his personality and have come to expect the same of all staff and appointees. Truthfully, as normal working people if we take note of the statistic you present comparing the indictment per month ratio of the zero DOJ to the 5000+/month under Trump's DOJ, I'd call that a danged showy body of work.
Thanks for the Q drop # 1413 and for your little ride on the OWL Train!
Why? Wills should be honored, just like other contracts. People who didi not like the terms he set up should have gone somewhere else, no?
Oh.
Try this. Michael Caine, right?
Justin Trudeau, Bill Clinton and Barry Obama all have something in common. Any guesses?
hint: a family member
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.