Q Anon: (6/9/18) FRiendly FReeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 6/8/2019 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[trustandobey]

LOL! She looks a little upset.

[Jack Black]

"Forced" resignations are difficult to distinguish from non-forced resignations. You quickly get into a he-said, she-said. "Did Suzie leave, or was she pushed out."

Vs. Indictments, Guilty Pleas, and Convictions. Those are pretty straight forward.

Firings are the tough one. For instance of the Sec. of the EPA is fired (which the Left is calling for) does that somehow score a point for Trump?

I think almost all rational people would say: No, of course not. Pruette was taken down by a campaign waged by anti-Trump forces.

The one firing I have listed was extremely clear cut: he was fired for lying, the OIG report said so, and the Office of Professional Responsibility said so. (Even so, the Left tried to spin it, but I think they backfired.)

No such system can be perfect, I'm doing the best I can and do appreciate eveyone's feedback, particularly thoughtful feedback such as your.

I think Page is likely to be indicted soon, but if she isn't then she really didn't suffer much for all her treachery. And any normie who was presented with her resignation as "proof" of the either her wrong-doing or a larger deep-state plot would say: "You are projecting. She just decided she was tired of Trump's leadersihp".

I know that because my lib acquaintances do say that.

But, they can't spin something like yesterday's indictment of Wolfe.

[Kalamata]

Love the picture.

Q very clearly said: NO DEALS.
So this is curious:

Ex-Dem IT aide Imran Awan poised for plea deal, after months of mysterious delays

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3661867/posts

[SkyPilot]

Three hours before his death was first reported, the Italian actress posted an Instagram story that showed her wearing a ripped, black T-shirt that read, “F–K EVERYONE” — with the cryptic caption, “You know who you are,”

It sounds like Bourdain and his girlfriend (who was raped by Weinstein) were going after the elite.

Can't have that.

[Yulee]

Q

[Jack Black]

A few people here think that they get to tell everyone else what to do and think. You guys are control freaks. You are rude, and post thoughtless ad-hominum and insulting posts. Like "Stifle, Edith". What's even the point of that?

I don't appreciate it, and neither does our host, who has had to weigh into this thread a few weeks ago and school some of you on your attacking other Freepers and generally acting like you own the place. You do not.

Here is some advice: My post is one of about 1,000 on each thread, on average. If you don't like it, skip over it.

The reason I repost it is that it is a moving score card, it is formatted the same, but the score changes as events proceed. If you did bother to read the most recent one you would see that it has about a page of compeletely new commentary, with a half a dozen links in it.

It's not merely a snide insult to anyone, it's not telling anyone what to do.

There are a number of people who have critiqued my metric, and I have responded to them with my reasons for doing what I do, and in some cases made changes.

I usually just skip personal insults like yours, but it seems like a few of you guys are working as a team to attack people you disagree with and force us out of the threads.

It's not going to work with me.

By the way, it's not like everyone agrees with you. I have received a lot of positive feedback on my efforts, much of it on PM. Why PM? Because you are creating an ugly environment of intimidation on these threads.

Please, just stop it. Stop the name calling. Stop the intimidation. Stop telling people to "stifle", "give it a rest" and stop posting their views on these threads.

Instead how about creating something of value for the rest of us, as I am sincerely trying to.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™
The daily memes of your Q-servative life

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™
The daily memes of your Q-servative life

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™
The daily memes of your Q-servative life

[Jack Black]

Q very clearly said: NO DEALS. So this is curious:

Ex-Dem IT aide Imran Awan poised for plea deal, after months of mysterious delays Well what I think in general is meant by Q and his interpreters when they say "NO DEALS" is that people who are guilty of crimes will have to answer for them. No body is going to get, for instance, the kind of treatment that Hillary got with her emails. THAT was a real deal.

On the other hand every criminal indictment always begins with an offer for the person indicted to admit that they did the crime. Entering a guilty plea is a deal of a sort, but not the kind that I think people object to.

Mueller's entire case is built upon deals: all these low level fish who plead guilty but (presumably, or hopefully) give information on the higher ups.

I won't speculate what Q meant, but I will say that it's extremely unlikely that any government prosecution is going to remove the ability of the prosecutors to accept guilty pleas and promise reduced sentences for cooperation. That would be self defeating, particularly when you are dealing with a large organized conspiracy, such as we see with the Democrats in DC.

[SERKIT]

[mairdie]

I’m a lurker who will support you publicly. You are listening to constructive criticism and you explain your positions and why you currently hold them. You know that Trump is behind but your scorecard looks forward to the day when he is ahead. You hope it’s a way to track his progress toward eventual success. When someone disagrees with how you set it up, you always politely listen.

If someone strongly disagrees with your methodology, I’m sure you’d support them making their own version and you could watch both versions over time. With no one needing to gloat if one turns out more accurately than another. It’s just two attempts to do the same thing.

I don’t think you’re trying to bring the morale of the group down. You just feel a need to understand with numbers. Everyone approaches understanding differently. Your scorecard will look better when more indictments come down.

[TEXOKIE]

The element of this picture I really like is Abe squarely in Trump’s camp echoing the crossed arms.

[outofsalt]

placemark

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™
The daily memes of your Q-servative life

[native texan]

One of the horses getting ready to run in the race is “One Go All Go” ??

[9YearLurker]

What’s he doing there—showing us his weight loss?

[SERKIT]

Certainly different body language than the previous occupant of the White House who bowed to leaders who didn’t like us much.

[SERKIT]

What’s he doing there—showing us his weight loss?

No idea but I like the way he rolls!

[zzeeman]

I think that your table and accompanying explanations are a very positive addition to the threads.

The effort to quantify events in a rational way is very useful to present "the world as it is," versus "the world that we wish is was" (at this point in time).

I have no doubt that everyone will be extremely happy when you publish your table updates that show "Team Trump" far in the lead!! Until then, there is nothing wrong with posting a dose of reality in a world that has too much (understandable, for sure) "hopium" in it.