Ex-Dem IT aide Imran Awan poised for plea deal, after months of mysterious delays Well what I think in general is meant by Q and his interpreters when they say "NO DEALS" is that people who are guilty of crimes will have to answer for them. No body is going to get, for instance, the kind of treatment that Hillary got with her emails. THAT was a real deal.
On the other hand every criminal indictment always begins with an offer for the person indicted to admit that they did the crime. Entering a guilty plea is a deal of a sort, but not the kind that I think people object to.
Mueller's entire case is built upon deals: all these low level fish who plead guilty but (presumably, or hopefully) give information on the higher ups.
I won't speculate what Q meant, but I will say that it's extremely unlikely that any government prosecution is going to remove the ability of the prosecutors to accept guilty pleas and promise reduced sentences for cooperation. That would be self defeating, particularly when you are dealing with a large organized conspiracy, such as we see with the Democrats in DC.
Thank you for your thoughtful reply, Jack.
Jack approaches our threads with respect. I don’t mind his posts because I don’t recall he’s been rude to anyone. He is a very tough grader, however.
“Nobody is going to get, for instance, the kind of treatment that Hillary got with her emails. THAT was a real deal.”
********************
Is there a statute of limitations on Hillary’s crimes?
If not, then why then is the DOJ ignoring the elephant in the room and not bringing indictments?
Or are they waiting to make sure the time clock runs out and Hillary cannot be charged?
Why not a mass gathering at the DOJ demanding Hillary’s arrest?
It’s obvious you put alot of effort and thought into your discussions. I appreciate your inquisitive process. When we are challenged to think it makes us better.