Q Anon: (5/24/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/24/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Charles Henrickson]

I saw her tweet that her dad is a MS Lutheran pastor.

Yes, Mollie's dad is an LCMS pastor, as am I.

[Wneighbor]

Hillary Clinton Wants to Be CEO of Facebook

Gees am I glad I never signed on! I know "they" have everything but I didn't spread it all over THAT creation. I suppose Hitlery has enough from FR for her thought police to hang me.

[little jeremiah]

You mean if Sessions was privy to this before the election? If he had heard about it (of course he was not a “friendly” so he probably did not know at that time), but if he did, he certainly would have informed Trump. If he knew about it, I doubt that would cause him to recuse himself; AFAIK his recusal is solely due to having helped Trump in his campaign.

[little jeremiah]

In-freeQing-credible! I really like Wictor.

[little jeremiah]

Oh, really?

And who the freeQ are you?

[TEXOKIE]

One of our fellow FReeQs approached me with the following information. In the finest traditions of Q, this one wishes to maintain a complete “anon” status. So respecting those wishes, I do present the following information, which I think is very worthwhile and noteworthy. It regards the issue of STOLEN TECHNOLOGY. There seems to be quite a long history of it, which was a real eye opener for me, while acknowledging that others more gifted in tech might be better informed on this than I was.

This info might be some of the background we need to know, as we approach the worldwide battle against those who would use technology against mankind.

STOLEN TECHNOLOGY

Our discussion began with my FRiend’s discovery that Hillary Clinton was a Patent Lawyer, and showed me a link from research at the 8ch site stating that fact.

I found this supportive link verifying that this is indeed the case:

https://www.natlawreview.com/article/hillary-clinton-s-intellectual-property-litigation-experience

Then my friend discovered this long article about stolen technologies:
http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/cyber-hijack-findings.html

I made some notes regarding the contents of this very long article.

* This ties in perfectly with a previous finding that H Clinton was a patent lawyer.

* The author notes that the hijacking of patent law in the US began during the time of President Washington.

* This article has and is a wonderful TIMELINE. I’ve been trying to collect different elements of/for timeline data. Others are doing work on this, as well. EXCELLENT detail and as far as I can see, good documentation.

* These paragraphs are, IMHO, describing the nub of what the whole presentation documents:

“The following 1990-2016 timeline and supporting facts provide unmistakable evidence of dereliction of duty, fraud, public corruption, the appearance of impropriety, racketeering, monopoly and anti-trust by senior United States government officials, Harvard and Stanford academics, judges, law firms and their commercial accomplices. American patent law itself has been hijacked by these individuals and their organizations.”

AND

“In 6, Leader was awarded its first patent. However, once the Deep State learned about Leader’s invention from an unscrupulous patent attorney and adviser to IBM and the NSA, they wanted it so badly they broke many laws to get it. The invention enabled them to create “The Internet of Things” or “The Internet of Everything” where they could permanently control the digital economy in all its aspects: communications, banking, law, energy, finance, elections, defense, technology, communications, media, healthcare, education, entertainment, politics, guns, food, environment and news.”

AND

” This sounds like Hollywood fiction, but as you will read in these pages, it is all too real.

The roots of the modern day “One World Order” agenda go back to the 1700’s and philosopher Emmanuel Kant’s essay. In the 20th century, President Woodrow Wilson’s failed effort to form The League of Nations eventually became The United Nations. The disciples of this soulless, mechanistic agenda include George Soros, Bilderberg Group, the 1910 Jekyll Island Club duck-hunt, World Economic Forum (Davos), Council on Foreign Relations, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and a slew of politicians, judges and bureaucrats. They benefit personally through investment gains and insider information.”

* As I look through this, the documentation is extremely detailed. IMHO every FReeper, much less FREEQ, needs to collect this link and and its files and have them preserved offline. It is truly a windfall of information. While use of it might require verifying the sources, (that would be true for all substantial research) it gives good research starting places.

* In the yellow panel with pictures of “Yale Corruptors” it would probably be impossible to name everyone, but I nominate Strobe Talbot to be added! He and Bill Clinton were Rhodes Scholar buds at Oxford.

From Wikipedia:
“Nelson Strobridge “Strobe” Talbott III (born April 25, 1946) is an American foreign policy analyst associated with Yale University and the Brookings Institution, a former journalist associated with Time magazine, and a diplomat who served as the Deputy Secretary of State from 1994 to 2001. He was president of Brookings from 2002 to 2017....”

But to be fair, I’m not sure what role he has had to play wrt to internet and data collection issues. But he has definitely been a big time globalist working in accord with their agendas.
[It should be noted that pix are shown in the article of Stanford and Harvard Corruptors as well.]

* I scrolled through all of this, and confess I did not follow the many links provided. I recognized the context of the major elements of the timeline, and saw also that there was so much relevant detail, that I do view this as a very important research / reference resource. It does deserve to be saved and archived in as much entirety as is possible, and off line by many.

It would make a good read to go through it element by element. One would certainly in that way transfer a lot of great info into the personal Brain Housing Group, but it would be the same as if I asked someone to read the Encyclopedia Britannica. Wonderful to do, to read it straight through, but imho, it is most powerful as being handy to look up data when you need it.

I congratulate my FReeQ FRiend, (who states is not an 8chan anon, but imho, OUR anon, nevertheless):

POWERFUL FIND!

Other important links found by our FReeq FRiend:

https://apelbaum.wordpress.com/tag/christopher-steele/

https://illuminatimatrix.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/tropics-sacrifice-pure-gold.jpg
~ ~ ~ ~ ~

[I’ve decided to christen my anonymous FReeQ friend with the following name, because of the endless typing that would otherwise be required in any all references to the same: FReeQanon........and also because I do not know whether FReeQanon is a “He or She” I will arbitrarily select “He” for ease of reference.]

Another later find by our FReeQanon with timeline elements wrt technology theft:

Leader tech developed the FB tech and it was stolen from them. They are suing.
https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2017/07/leader-technologies-files-trillion.html

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xQFIBBlO0As

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/983401749779308545.html

Respectfully submitted to the “Bagster Oracle” for general consideration.

TEXOKIE

[LucyT]

.

PING.

Check out #299 and #300.

Thanks, Little J.

[Wneighbor]

RE: St Michael’s Prayer

I must admit I’d never heard of that prayer until I saw mention trying to catch up this morning. I’m running around like a chicken with my head cut off today but I googled St Michael’s Prayer when I saw the reference. I love it. It fits my prayer style. God armed us. St. Michael’s Prayer matches my spirit when I am praying. I am blessed it was brought up.

[Swordmaker]

Mystery solved, what COVFEFE really means (not a typo):

Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically For Engagement Act of 2017 or the COVFEFE Act of 2017

Uh, no. Bill introduced after Trump used Covfefe in tweet. . . By a Democrat congress critter.

[txhurl]

If data from the unmasking made it into the daily PDBs - which it did and ValJar secreted ALL the PDBs off to zero’s ‘library’ ‘for some reason’ - then POTUS *and* his top 30 knew all about the spying.

[slag]

‘how did they figure they could take Trump out before election without any type of legal prosecution?’

Remember at one of Trump’s campaign rallies he said he hoped Russia would find Hillarys lost emails.

I think HRC, BHO and deep state decided to give DJT’s campaign those emails ie. plants within campaign and then FBI could swoop in and make it public that they had received illegal info.

[RitaOK]

Where would we go for Q homework, reviews of past Q drops, and related discussions, breaking news that relates? “PAST PROVES FUTURE”. Etc.

Some other thread perhaps?

Not to worry. *Ransomnote is our thread sponsor and we’re still turning at least 1000 posts per 24 hours. On-topic, tension free, and no FOOD posts make a great thread for research and theory.

[StormFlag]

I know how you feel, (gal here) but not offended by the word fella.

I believe we have evidence of the effectiveness of prayer in the political arena, or else our great President would not have been elected.

My approach is to keep that in mind when I feel concerned, and trust that an adjustment is coming that includes exposure of many things that have been hidden. Not my will, but thine (Lord) be done.

It is a mighty battle that requires alertness and good thinkers to support it.

And that is why, I believe we are all drawn here to this thread, to think about the Q posts, because we love our country, support our President, and will do whatever we can to help him right the ship.

You are one of those proud patriots. Thank you!

[RitaOK]

🙄 I didn’t hear anything.. did you?

[outinyellowdogcountry]

If our little country church had been LCHS we might still be attending. But ELCA isn’t for us.

[txhurl]

Recipes comin’ right up

[Cboldt]

-- ... how did they figure they could take Trump out before election without any type of legal prosecution? --

Bad press. Billy Bush, etc. and anything they could get.

-- Seems to me they would need paperwork with some patina of legality in order to take him out either before or after election. --

They don't need any "paperwork with a patina of legality" if he loses. The need for paperwork corresponds with asserting a finding that the government saw "collusion with Russia." The narrative that the Russians hacked the DNC on Trump's behalf is supposedly supported with non-government "Crowdstrike" material.

The value of having "government papers" comes into play only if he is elected, and then it is used to dodge criminal charges and to advance to impeachment and removal.

-- Just making up smack and announcing it via their handmaiden MSM/DSM would not be enough even before election, IMHO. --

It usually is enough. Most candidates would have folded early. One mistake they made was thinking Trump would be a weak opponent, a joke of a candidate. Otherwise he would have been attacked harder during the primary.

-- What are National Security Letters? --

National security letter - Wikipedia
National Security Letters | Electronic Frontier Foundation
National Security Letters: FAQ | Electronic Frontier Foundation <- quick read
National Security Letter Statutes <- dense/legalese

Very contentious surveillance tool. No warrant, no suspicion needed.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™