Posted on 05/19/2018 11:38:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
I totally like this theory. It makes perfect sense. Sign me up.
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
Maybe so but at this point in time I don’t see how we could legally have tribunals without the vast majority saying coup.
Concur.
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
Glad youre feeling better!
:-D
Military tribunals, like all of these mystical legal tools, swing both ways.
One. One very long one. . .
WOW!
I just imported it into Apple Pages and its 108 pages long, 25,832 words. I'm actually SHOCKED, I tell you, SHOCKED!
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
The last time we had military tribunals was when Lincoln invoked the Insurrection Act of 1807 after the incident at Fort Sumter in 1861.
My suspicion is that Trump expects an insurrection of social justice warriors, Black Lives Matter activists, SIEU members and anybody else Soros can mobilize when the arrests begin. He's expecting mobs to prevent the arrest of others when their indictments are announced. He's expecting California and other states to attempt unilateral secession, all of which would be sufficient for him to invoke the Insurrection Act and ask Congress for a declaration of martial law. Once that happens, military tribunals become legal.
No coup needed.
TRUST (name) is a reference to the person to be named to backfill Rosenstein’s removal
I totally like this theory. It makes perfect sense. Sign me up.
Bagster
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Me too.
WOW quite full of yourself tonight aren’t ya?
p.s. I love ideas.
(see tagline for further information)
:)
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
Nope, it's a dumpster in a bag. . .
And I suppose the Standard Polling Mechanisms will begin to report unbiased polls on that or any other subject shortly after H*** freezes over.
(Excuse the sarc, but.....)
The NEXIUM connection: Allison Mack "sang" on AG Schneiderman....He took the fall on the ordeal with his women he physically abused
Long story here:
https://steemit.com/politics/@steveouttrim/ny-attorney-general-steps-down-beat-4-women-links-to-nexium-weinstein-clinton
“Perhaps the estrogen-drenched will grow weary of being shunned and talking only in their own wind tunnel-——”
What the hell are you trying to say with that comment?
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.