Q Anon: (5/19/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/19/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[reformedliberal]

... slated from before birth for the resultant path...
___
I’ve seen the stories to that effect.

I think more likely they had a checklist: POC; generational ties to IC;attractive; personal issues (drugs/sex); a chameleon and a cipher. ValJar, et al, went on the hunt. They were energized by the success of Harold Washington in Chicago. Whatever-his-name-is checked the boxes. Val set him up w/Mooch. Mooch also checked all the boxes: issues; generational loyalty to black commies/DNC/community organizers. A match made in the fabled smoky backrooms of Chicago.

So, in a way, the choice was made while whatever-his-name-is was still a child, but he was on the shortlist and grew up to fit the role. He needed female (or passable tranny) handlers. Val & Mooch took the place of mom and grandma.

If Val is indicted, look for whatever-his-name-is to disappear with a pile of cash. They will leave the grieving Mooch & the daughters to carry on the legacy like a skewed version of Jackie O and the kids.

20% of whatever remains of the prog base will venerate the legacy. It will be a relatively small number of acolytes who will eventually age out and die off.

All the elites care about is whether the chosen one is electable, controllable and eventually disposable. They will martyr him, if necessary.

[Melian]

I was thinking Gowdy could replace RR.

[bagster]

No doubt in my mind God is protecting our President.

And so is that Nxivm chick that ratted out Scheiderman. (and the people that busted Nxivm and flipped her. (Q's peeps):)

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[jersey117]

Wray comes from the same big law firm as Sally Yates. She just went back to work there last month. I used to work there. Not sure if I trust him. These lawyers stick together.

[jersey117]

Wray comes from the same big law firm as Sally Yates. She just went back to work there last month. I used to work there. Not sure if I trust him. These lawyers stick together.

[fatima]

Beware the anger and endurance of the patient man.?What does that mean.Jim told Bagster to knock it off and for everybody to get off the backs you don’t agree with.

[RitaOK]

Okay, 🤔 thinking the quiet, humbled ones are White Hats. Either they are white hats, or indicted. Which brings us to Loretta Lynch.. turned, or indicted?

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

There was some suggestion that under the appointments clause RR did not have the power to appoint Mueller or the others? That their appointment could be challenged on the basis?

I have to be careful here and not damage myself playing lawyer make-believe—my expertise focuses on different aspects of the law, use your seatbelt, signal when you turn, and pay your taxes on time, that stuff.

[weston]

Exactly. That’s why Q said it’s important to know What is reporting to RR. Rosenweizel is bottlenecking document production from Wray.

[bagster]

why is Brand “no good”....

Doesn't matter, she was purged.

She was an Obama drone, I believe.

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[GYPSY286]

That’s what I meant. Time to get some sleep...

[Swordmaker]

I was on a Qanon twitter thread and a commenter posted that IF RR recuses himself or quits, President Trump can appoint someone for 210 days as “acting” and would it not be fabulous if he appointed Flynn or Rogers? They both already cleared their confirmations and belonging to the Military could be called back. That would be EXCELLENT.

It can't be Flynn or Rogers. It has to be someone who has already been through the Senate approval process for an authoritative political position. Any authoritative position, so long as it was approved by the nominating/approval process. Flynn was in a position and Rogers resigned and would have to go through it again. He could, however, reposition someone from another department, someone else appointed in the DOJ, etc.

[txhurl]

That would fix just about everything.

[Melian]

I’m thinking she’s singing in private because she’s sure quiet in public.

[bagster]

I'm sorry, were you addressing me?

Why?

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[reformedliberal]

...how long before their own evil networks are 100% verified enough to start real-flagging them?
_____________________________
Timeline TBD.

“They will be afraid to walk down the streets.”

They may be fragged by their own, first.

[slag]

What do you think about this Q post in relation to the AG position.

#537
TG (Trey Gowdy) departure [HEC].
NOT to testify.
NOT needed to testify.
Think logically.
NO NEED to step down if needed to TESTIFY.
DO NOT chase MISINFO.
What ROLE might TG be walking into?

[bagster]

Which brings us to Loretta Lynch.. turned, or indicted?

I'm gonna say Loretta falls under Q's [No deals] doctrine. But that's just a guess. She's way dirty.

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[Cboldt]

Complicated business. I think RR was nominated as "unknown," and he (RR) fired Comey as a faux show of loyalty to Trump, but was playing the long game on speculation deep state would eventually prevail. Pure mercenary.

No way to tell in advance. Put to the test and the colors show.

[M. Thatcher]

No doubt in my mind God is protecting our President.

Exactly.

Not to mention giving Trump "a very particular set of skills."