[ransomnote]

I'm snagging Non-Compliant_Deplorable's post:

"Here are some resources for foundation/nonprofit research that I had stashed. Happy hunting!"

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3654597/posts?page=685#685

[ransomnote]

Q Ping

Welcome to Saturday’s new Q Anon thread.

Calling All Prayer Warriors:

Please pray that God would focus our attention on priority content and help us share information to prepare our friends and family members.

Please continue to pray for the safety and success of President Trump, his family, those who serve him, and all patriots.

Please pray against our enemies, false flags, civil unrest and all other distractions.

Please pray for those serving in our military, for their protection, guidance and comfort in the middle of the storm.

Please pray for discernment and focus so that we are not distracted but instead, are able to work together to support President Trump and the Q team.

Please click “Private Message” to let me know if you would like on or off the ping list.

[ransomnote]

Q Ping

Welcome to Saturday’s new Q Anon thread.

Calling All Prayer Warriors:

Please pray that God would focus our attention on priority content and help us share information to prepare our friends and family members.

Please continue to pray for the safety and success of President Trump, his family, those who serve him, and all patriots.

Please pray against our enemies, false flags, civil unrest and all other distractions.

Please pray for those serving in our military, for their protection, guidance and comfort in the middle of the storm.

Please pray for discernment and focus so that we are not distracted but instead, are able to work together to support President Trump and the Q team.

Please click “Private Message” to let me know if you would like on or off the ping list.

[JockoManning]

A new Q drop seems to say something about Judges? i don’t understand it because it is so cryptic.

[Jack Black]

It's a bit of a nit, but I don't think the ISIS guys we captured were "the top five". They were "among the top leaders" or something less than the top five. Obviously any "top five" list has to include the leader himself.

As he he is not among these five, the claim that these are the top five is an exaggeration..

The importance of capturing "Caliph Ibrahim" far outweighs the significance of all five of the others combined.

Here is a little background from Wikipedia: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

On 29 June 2014, ISIL announced the establishment of a worldwide caliphate. Al-Baghdadi was named its caliph, to be known as "Caliph Ibrahim", and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant was renamed the Islamic State (IS).[9][79] There has been much debate, especially across the Muslim world, about the legitimacy of these moves.

To believers in ISIS's version of Islam: Bakr's pronouncement symbolized the return of legitimate united Islam to the planet, something that has not existed since the fall of the Ottaman Empire following WW1.

Be honest: has anyone ever heard of these five people previously? I'm not saying anyone is lying - BUT - we have been treated to a long list of claims that every arrest is "Abu Bakr Bhagdadi's top assistant, top Lieutenant, best general", etc.

It's a natural human tendency to exaggerate, and apparently military intelligence is not immune.

[greeneyes]

THANKS FOR ALL YOU DO!

[JockoManning]

Hey, Bags,

Some of your style may be resulting in diminishing returns.

In this sort of context, not everyone responds well, constructively, redemptively, and certainly not warmly to the sort of carrying on that might happen on a Navy ship, a fireman's team, a construction crew etc. And trying to force those resistant to such into that mold at some point not only fails to work--it is extremely off-putting to irritating to exasperating to bone marrow insulting. Then it just engenders increasing amounts of ill-will.

I suggest that you identify those who can roll with and enjoy such punches and can return them GOOD-NATUREDly and in kind--and share such ONLY with those folks.

AVOID insulting, accosting, attacking anyone's personhood--particularly if they have asked you to stop or given no indication that they enjoy such.

AND, when you are mostly chiding, deriding some action or behavior--perhaps you could be less virulent, hostile stabby in your choice of words.

And those who you are not attacking their personhood on--but 'merely' their behavior or points of view--could possibly learn to divorce their personhood from being soooo wedded to their words or perspectives so intensely that they feel slapped in the face at the slightest challenge or insult. Let Bag's crap roll off your back like water off a duck. Why give him the power to drive your emotions any direction at all?

Bags, if you were an insecure, RAD/PTSD afflicted individual who'd been squashed by others most of your life from an early age--who had a hard time holding your head up and standing tall even in a gentle kind context--and who happened to be food-addicted and overweight--your derisive words about fatties could cut to the quick.

My housemate has a heart of gold and is kind and loving even toward those who have abused him. Nevertheless, sometimes his sharp words can unwittingly hurt people. I saw him get better over the years but he still has to be careful in some groups.

He has wrestled with depression enough himself that he certainly doesn't want to NEEDLESSLY send anyone into a tailspin because of a thoughtless, flip word or sentence.

We just never know what kind of day someone is having. We don't know what debilitating background or current family relationships or work relationships are burdening folks we interact with. Let us not add to their burden but build them up as much as possible.

Some few folks can throw your junk back in your face as much as you dish it out. Please limit your harsh words to them.

Your guerrilla psych treatments are just not achieving anything good with many in this crew.

Cheers.

[eyedigress]

Q is on fire!

Think Logically!

[Swordmaker]

SWORDMAKER’S

LexiQon
May 13, 2018
1:50 AM PDT

---

To explore the Qomplete up-to-date LexiQon, Qlick on the Q iQon above.

---

Link to List of Notable Resignations Q Says We Should Watch

---

Today’s revisions and additions:

• Bribe: (#67) A bribe is the gift bestowed to influence the recipient's conduct. It may be money, goods, rights in action, property, preferment, privilege, emolument, objects of value, advantage, or merely a promise to induce or influence the action, vote, or influence of a person in an official or public capacity. Many types of payments or favors can constitute bribes: tip, gift, sop, perk, skim, favor, discount, waived fee/ticket, free food, free ad, free trip, free tickets, sweetheart deal, kickback/payback, funding, inflated sale of an object or property, lucrative contract, donation, campaign contribution, fundraiser, sponsorship/backing, higher paying job, stock options, secret commission, promotion (rise of position/rank), or later lucrative, influential, or prominent employment. (See BC, CF, Hillary Clinton, HRC, and Kickback).
  . . .
  
• D5: (#1332)
  • The D5 Nations, defined as nations whose governments are most digitally connected, first formed in 2014, include Great Britain, Estonia, Israel, South Korea, and New Zealand (current host/chair), which last met during the last week of February in New Zealand. The D5 Nations. (Thanks to FreeQ Aquamarine for the find).
  • D5 Caterpillar Tractor might be appropriate to use in pushing Q’s snowball off a cliff which could cause a . . .
  • D5 Avalanche, as that is a rating on the Danger scale used to rate the potential danger an avalanche’s severity should it occur from D1-5, with 5 being most severe.
  . . .
  
• EC: (INFO) Electronic Communication, as in the email, instant message, or other communications from CIA Director Brennan to the FBI Director which initiated the investigation of the Trump campaign organization. (Thanks to TXnMA for the heads up). (See Brennan, CIA, FBI).
  . . .
  
• Halper, Stefan Halper: (INFO)  Foreign policy expert and Cambridge professor with connections to the CIA and its British counterpart, MI6 who ensnared George Papadopoulos and set him up to be supposedly a "Russian" contact inside the Trump Campaign Organization. Halper meets all the given criteria for the FBI/CIA operative who set up the sting. Stefan Halper checks off every single box:  √Currently overseas. √Current/Former CIA operative. √Current/Former source for FBI. √Anti-Trump motive. √Formerly put together this exact type of operation. √Connections to UK spies/intel community/politicians. √Connection to Australian spies/intel community. √Connection to Alexander Downer. √Political operative. √Wanted Clinton to win 2016 election. √Connects to Carter Page. √Connects to George Papadopoulos. √Connects to John Brennan. ETC. the Conservative Treehouse: "The Insurance Policy, The “EC”, The 2016 FBI Counterintel Operation, and The Mysterious Informant Who Originated Brennan’s EC…". (See Brennan, CIA, FBI, Insurance policy, Papadopoulos, PS, Strzok).
  . . .

• Insurance Policy: (INFO) The backup plan to destroy the presidency of Donald Trump proposed in illicit emails between FBI Agent Peter Strzok and his lover FBI staff attorney Lisa Page, in case candidate Donald Trump did the impossible and actually defeated Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton. (See Brennan, CIA, FBI, Halper, Page, Papadopoulos, Strzok).
  . . .
  
• Kickback: (#972) A kickback is a form of negotiated bribery in which a commission is paid to the bribe-taker in exchange for services rendered. Generally speaking, the remuneration (money, goods, or services handed over) is negotiated ahead of time. The kickback varies from other kinds of bribes in that there is implied collusion between agents of the two parties, rather than one party extorting the bribe from the other. The purpose of the kickback is usually to encourage the other party to cooperate in the illegal scheme. (See BC, Bribe, CF, Hillary Clinton, HRC).

[bitt]

NEW Q POSTS 4/12/

come and get em

START AT #1

[eldoradude]

Another research link for those interested.

For Loop Capital Markets here is a great place to start:

https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=3157486

2 minutes in Valerie Jarrett shows up...

[StormFlag]

WW G1WGA

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Is it safe to poke my head up around here?

Happy mother’s day, you mothers.

[Kalam]

Ransomnote, thank you for all of the work you do to keep these threads going.

To all the freeQs who are mothers out there Happy Mothers Day.

Was away, came back, went out, came back and WOW; Q Drop mania.

Last 1 1/2 hours of catching up this am. and I’m further behind. Mothers Day events cannot and will not be dismissed. Only thing for it is to keep on keeping on, when time allows.

WWG1WGA

[JDoutrider]

mark

[mairdie]

Husband sent me an interesting thread connecting old timers to the possible Trump campaign moles.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/994380612281798656.html

Thread by @CarrollQuigley1: “1/ I’ve got a good one for you. Ed Cox (Nixon Staff) is married to Nixon’s daughter. Ed Cox sent Carter Page to Trump. Ed Cox is a Director […]”

[BlessedBeGod]

You had asked back on the old thread if someone would post the NYTimes article that Q mentioned. Got it:

European Companies Rushed to Invest in Iran. What Now?

By Jack Ewing and Stanley Reed
May 9, 2018

FRANKFURT — European companies moved quickly to invest in Iran after it agreed in 2015 to mothball its nuclear weapons program in return for an end to economic sanctions.

Automakers like Daimler and PSA Peugeot Citroën linked up with Iranian partners to sell vehicles. Siemens of Germany struck a deal to deliver locomotives. Total of France began a project to explore offshore natural gas.

Yet even before President Trump pulled out of the agreement with Iran, many companies had already tempered their expectations and limited their investment. Now their prospects look murkier as European leaders try to determine whether there is a path forward without the United States.

Officials in Europe want to protect its companies by finding ways to shield them from American sanctions while they continue doing business in Iran.

The United States, however, has not struck an optimistic tone. Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, has already said licenses that allow Boeing and Airbus, the American and European aircraft giants, to sell to Iran “will be revoked.”

“The objective is to put and maintain maximum sanctions on Iran,” Mr. Mnuchin said.

With a population of about 82 million and substantial oil reserves, Iran represented a largely untouched market with the potential for fast growth, a rare opportunity for Western companies with global ambitions.

While players like General Electric and Boeing lined up orders, many American companies, including oil giants like Chevron and Exxon Mobil, had to watch from a distance; even with the deal in place, they were still effectively blocked by sanctions imposed by the United States from working in Iran. European businesses did not have the same restrictions.

For Europe, Iran was a particularly promising example of the kind of fast-growing emerging country that helped lift the region out of a severe debt crisis in recent years. German companies, for instance, have thrived by selling factory machinery, power grid infrastructure and construction equipment that growing nations need to build modern economies.

Despite its potential, however, Iran has largely been a disappointment for European investors. In a dysfunctional economy, many failed to gain traction in a huge bureaucracy rife with political power struggles.

Companies have also been stifled by a reluctance of foreign banks to provide financing, and fears — fully justified, as it turned out — that the nuclear détente would not last.

Although exports from the European Union to Iran increased by about one-third last year to 10.8 billion euros, or about $12.8 billion, the country still ranked only 33rd among the bloc’s trading partners, behind the likes of Kazakhstan and Serbia.

“German-Iranian economic relations are lagging their potential,” Volker Treier, head of the exports department at the Association of German Chambers of Commerce and Industry, said in an email.

After Mr. Trump’s decision not to extend a moratorium on sanctions, Mr. Treier said, “the moderately positive development in business with Iran comes with a big question mark.”

In the end, expectations may simply have been too high.

After sanctions were lifted, Airbus of France signed a deal to remake Iran Air’s aging fleet with more than 100 aircraft, including a dozen super jumbo A380s.

So far, Airbus has delivered just three jets, none of them super jumbos, a company spokesman said on Tuesday. Two of the three have been leased.

In 2016, Daimler signed an agreement with Iran Khodro, a vehicle maker based in Tehran, to distribute Fuso brand trucks. Demand has been limited, however, because of Iran’s weak economy, Daimler spokesman Florian Martens said Tuesday.

Even the Iranian oil industry was having trouble attracting foreign investors — the only significant deal the country signed after sanctions were lifted was with Total for an offshore natural gas development.

Whether Total can stay in the deal is open to question. Although Europe may yet carve out protections for companies from the region, the company fears the imposition of so-called secondary sanctions by the United States against non-American businesses and individuals as part of the decision to pull out of the nuclear accord.

Patrick Pouyanné, Total’s chief executive, recently said that the company would argue that because it had signed its Iran deal before Mr. Trump’s decision, Total should benefit from a “grandfather clause” and would ask for a waiver from the United States to continue. Total also might turn its share over to its minority partner CNPC, a Chinese state-owned oil company.

European Union officials said on Tuesday that they were making plans to blunt the impact of Mr. Trump’s withdrawal — presumably helping insulate companies like Total.

“We are working on plans to protect the interests of European companies,” Maja Kocijancic, a spokeswoman for the European Commission, told reporters on Tuesday.

It was unclear, however, what those measures might be.

France, for example, hopes to engage in more detailed dialogue with the Trump administration to press for waivers for its companies. But it was too soon to say whether Mr. Trump would be swayed, according to two people with knowledge of the situation. It was also not immediately clear whether Mr. Trump would recognize the “grandfather clause” arguments favored by Total, the people said.

Mr. Trump’s decision to pull out of the deal with Iran may not automatically prompt governments to choke off trade.

Having ripped up an international deal, the president may have trouble recruiting allies and cutting off exports of Iranian oil, the country’s most valuable product.

Iran’s crude exports have risen to about 2.4 million barrels a day in recent months, after being around 1 million barrels a day in the months before sanctions were lifted.

“It is going to be hard to get people on board,” said Richard Nephew, a former State Department official who was the lead sanctions expert in the Iran negotiations under President Barack Obama and who successfully persuaded other customers of Iran to stop buying its oil in the years leading up to the eventual nuclear deal.

Mr. Nephew, now a senior research scholar at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, forecast that of Iran’s major customers, Japan and South Korea would most likely cooperate on sanctions because they are worried about Washington’s negotiations with North Korea.

He said European customers, however, would probably be slower to come around. And China and India, which in some months have been buying more than 1 million barrels a day from Iran, may continue to buy Iranian crude in the same quantities.

All told, the impact of renewed sanctions would be an estimated loss of 300,000 to 500,000 barrels a day of Iranian exports, Mr. Nephew said. That would be a significant amount, but much less than the 1.4 million barrels a day or so that Mr. Obama’s sanctions achieved.

In the meantime, Iran is running its oil industry at full tilt, analysts say. “It is obvious that they are anticipating potential new sanctions and running full speed before it happens,” said Antoine Rostand, president of Kayrros, a Paris-based market research firm.

But the sanctions would nonetheless create major complications. Iran has quickly pumped up oil production in existing fields, but these will eventually become tapped out. It won’t be able to bring new fields online without partners and capital.

Still, giant oil corporations have not given up on Iran.

“We continue to be interested in exploring the role Shell can play in developing Iran’s energy potential within the boundaries of applicable laws,” Royal Dutch Shell said in an email on Tuesday.

The same principle applies to other investors, provided they are big enough — and wealthy enough — to handle the risk, said Andreas Schweitzer, managing director of Arjan Capital, a firm in London that advises companies on investing in Iran.

“Those who want this 80-million-person market and have a long-term strategy,” he said, “will go there with or without Mr. Trump.”

Correction: 

Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misspelled the surname of the chief executive of Total. He is Patrick Pouyanné, not Pouyannée.

[MomwithHope]

Post from my better half -

Here is a synthesis of ideas around the mission of Q and what is happening. None of the thoughts are original, I just happened to stitch them into based on my life experience. So here is my 2¢ worth of free opinion:

Q repeats several phrases:
-Dark to LIGHT
-Future proves Past
-This is BIGGER than you think
-ARE YOU AWAKE?
And recently
-The choice will always be yours

I enjoy listening to Dan Bongino. He has talked about some of his experiences as a Secret Service agent. One idea that he mentioned is if a conspiracy is neat and tidy and wrapped in a bow, its probably a setup. Real life isn’t clean and neat but quite often “messy”. If you begin with all the Q posts beginning last year and scroll through them, topics change, focus is placed in different areas from Mockingbird to the previous administration to ANTIFA to the legal system to child trafficking to sex cults to any number of things. In a recent post “it” (the target of Q’s strategy/actions) was even described as an octopus living in a pyramid.

There have been rabbit holes around what [P] means. Who or what is “P”? Thinking “bigger” or “biggly”, I offer a concept that a very dear priest taught us many years ago which I’m fairly certain Q wasn’t thinking about when it was posted. Ever since the Garden of Eden, most of man’s motivations can be traced back to 4 P’s – Pride, Pocketbook ($), Power, Pleasure. From the fall from Grace, mankind has been plagued with people oppressing people motivated by the 4 P’s. What if Q’s strategy is on a much grander scale (WW) to take down structures that have been put in place as a result of man’s inclination toward the 4P motivations? I’m talking about a level higher than the illuminati or Rockefellers or other master controllers. That would explain why on the surface there are many apparent disjointed efforts to bust a sex cult as well as a U1 swindle and apparent WW3 setup. Wait, what? It truly is THE age-old fight of good vs. evil! Another idea our priest friend told us was that God unites, Satan divides. This is true based on recent discussions within the Q thread on FR as well as the Corsi / AJ discussions. We tend to focus on personalities involved instead of the root cause – God vs Satan. If Satan can distract or deflect a conversation or action he’ll use whatever he can to accomplish that. STAY UNITED. Trust the Plan! Free will is unique to mankind. Its our choice, and always will be. One choice available is to wake up to reality (Red Pill) or remain in darkness. Check out between 8:53- 10:01 on this 1984 video interview with Yuri Bezmenov (posted a few days ago on this thread):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLqHv0xgOlc

Someone described U.S. diplomacy as a baseball game. Up to now the audience would enjoy a slow-moving game – get singles and advance the runners with bunts with an occasional double or triple or an exciting home run. Home team and visitors would change sides and give the appearance of progress. Trump joins the game and out of the box he starts swinging for the fences. In regards to NK the “official” team (DS) criticized him for not understanding how to play the game, he doesn’t understand how real diplomacy takes years, even decades to make progress. Its complex and he doesn’t know what he’s doing”. Then it was “He’ll get us into a nuclear war”, then it was “Yea, well we’ve been here before. We’ve seen hostages released but nothing comes of it”. The point being, no matter what he does, the messaging is always aimed at dividing us. As a quick side note – we’re invested in a dairy stock that is a real disruptor for the dairy industry. I have to laugh because similar conversations are going on about the stock as conversations are going on about Trump. People are applying “regular” stock rules to this disrupter and it isn’t working. The point is, when a disrupter enters the field, you can’t apply the same rules that have worked in the past. Performance will always exceed expectations because a disrupters blaze their own trails. Trump is blazing the trail now and he is playing by a different set of rules.

Finally, there will be a day when what we are currently witnessing will be history. I am reminded of the great movie “The Ten Commandments”. Moses led the Israelites out of bondage and slavery and once they had their freedom it took less than one generation to fall back into their “4P” behavior. I really wonder what the future will look like and hopefully we will learn from the past (future proves past). WWG1WGA.

[Non-Compliant_Deplorable]

Just found this anon post, thought it worth sharing:
_______________

Anonymous 05/13/18 (Sun) 12:02:18 a18cc0 No.1397169

This mapping provides the (Soros) Open Society European Policy Institute and the Open Society network intelligence on Members of the 8th European Parliament likely to support (Soros) Open Society values during the 2014–2019 legislature.

It spans 11 committees and 26 delegations, as well as the European Parliament’s highest decision making bodies: 226 MEPs who are proven or likely (Soros) Open Society allies.

https://legacy.gscdn.nl/archives/images/soroskooptbrussel.pdf
________________

[Non-Compliant_Deplorable]

An anon has done a youtube vid about the Iran deal. Very high quality. (And doesn’t ask for our money. kek)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=17&v=DUSvSkCuDd4

[bitt]

https://www.facebook.com/groups/QAnonQClearance4chan8chanV2/about/

JUST ONE FACEBOOK SITE..