Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Playing the Jesus card, now.
What's next?
Bagster
You're right. They forgot to wear a sign that says, "This is a false flag operation."
I guess we'll just have to use our brains and notice the pattern and attribute it to a logical conclusion.
Bagster
If you’d actually examined the cases on edzo4’s list you would know there is no good reason to label any of them a “false flag” operation. There are huge problems to be solved with the operations of the FBI and with much of our politically correct counter-terrorism, but labelling every idiot jihadist as an FBI “false flag” robot is just silly.
The FBI ignoring clues or failing to investigate properly does not imply “false flag” operations. It usually demonstrates rampant political correctness pervading incompetent operations, as in these listed cases.
How about flushing such feelings and compulsions down the toilet. It is taking energy that would better be spent against the enemy and building fellow Q-er's FREEPERS up.
It appears that ignoring all such posts and posters is the wisest response. We can do it--particularly if we avoid allowing our compulsive reflexive responses to get hooked.
One of Qx's favorite pastors used to say: "We are no bigger than the smallest thing that gets us down {or hooks us}.
Put your big girl panties/ super hung jock strap on and act like adults vs someone who has lost their binkey.
The best article on Q yet:
‘
Are members of the independent media feeling so hopeless that they must have their Q fixeven though they dont know who Q is or if what Q claims is even true? Qs track record since the switch to a different entity isnt great and they were not forthcoming with the fact that they are not the original QAnon, so they are imposters. Are honesty and truth only appropriate some of the time?’
http://www.starshipearththebigpicture.com/2018/04/04/qanon-the-inconvenient-truth-part-i-videos/
Your post goes a long way to proving my theory. I have wondered why good, strong conservative Freepers refuse to accept the Q phenomenon when it's so blatantly, obviously legit.
It didn't make any sense to me. Many of the deniers are very intelligent, yourself being a prime example. Of course, a lot of them are semi-retarded stumblebums like FW/eyedigress and carloada.
In your last post, you set yourself up as the wise man on the hill, who is here to Socratically inspire thinking and spread your wisdom.
I think that people like you, who are used to being "the smartest person in the room" feel challenged and yes, jealous, that your flock looks elsewhere for information.
I honestly think that's a thing. Take an honest look at yourself and ask yourself if that's possible. It was your last post that tipped me to my conclusion. Read it again with my words fresh in your mind.
And see if I didn't call it.
Bagster
Tell us the truth, are you talking about yourself in the third person? If not, why should anyone give a damn about 'Qx', who was what, zotted by request, right? It is just weird.
Hey Fantifa. Be eyedigress for a little while. Your dime store psychology/whining is getting boring. Break it up with a ittle retardation to keep us on our toes, willya?
ThankQ
Bagster
You got it backwards. The ones posting puerile, nasty, vulgar and demeaning slop are the Qers. The ones who encourage this sadistic ad hominem are the same ones who post loud, attention-grabbing public prayers.
Backtrack through the thread and take a look at some of the nasty, creepy garbage and vicious attacks Edzo has posted. This is what Q engenders, and it’s sick.
Not really, because I know myself very thoroughly and I do not desire any kind of “flock” in any way whatsoever. I enjoy discussion, yes, and thinking about various issues in the world. But I have no personal need or desire for anyone to follow me or hang upon my words or ideas. I simply enjoy the discussions (usually).
AND, of course, I really do hope to see the MAGA agenda succeed to a great extent. But I would not imagine that exchanges with someone like edzo4 will ever help to further MAGA.
Some folks still respect his memory and his opinion. Not writing that to anyone else. No need to get your knickers in a twist.
If your post was supposed to make sense, it failed. I choose the truth option. Thats why Qers hate me.
************************************************************
To: TEXOKIE
One more option. Mueller is neither a black hat, white hat, or grey hat. He can be leveraged, cause he is crooked as a dogs hind leg, and might be trying to keep his guilty as sin self out of the jail house.
672 posted on 05/06/2018 12:39:58 AM PDT by greeneyes
To: greeneyes
Theres not one scintilla of evidence that Mueller has been compromised. Every single piece of available evidence indicates that hes on a full-throttle seek and destroy mission aimed at President Trump. Its been evident from the beginning that there are no limitations on his witch hunt/fishing expedition. He is the Deep States insurance policy. In the event Trump won, impeachment was the next step. Muellers commission is to supply the crime/charges on which the impeachment will rest.
To: Fantasywriter
So you choose the black hat option. Good for you.
774 posted on 05/06/2018 11:25:27 AM PDT by greeneyes
***********************************************************
Four options were discussed as the above posts show. Black, white, gray, or leveraged hats.
Your wonderful description seemed to be describing a black hat. Black hat and Truth option are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
God Bless-Have a great Sunday.
Evidently we are on different planets, if not different galactic clusters.
Remember my comment about why people are anti-Q, especially trollers or haters? A couple in connection with not wanting to admit “Hey, I was wrong” or “Gosh, I DON’T know everything, after all!”.
Wanting to continue to be the all knowing authority.
Tsk tsk, bad mindset to be in.
Don’t take this the wrong way, but I like the serious “thoughtful” Bagster a great deal. When you are not clowning you have really interesting things to say. I hope we all get to see more of that.
So you support the sewage with which Edzo4 has been larding the thread. That is just so sad and tragic—unspeakably so.
Thank you, and lessings to you and yours as well.
This describes you:
Matthew 25:40
The King will answer and say to them, Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.
I don’t receive your unwarranted allegation. I support reasonable logic, evidence, accuracy and conjectures regardless via whom they are presented. I think FR’s brainstorming is tops in the country, or near so.
lessings = blessings
I have made no comment re brainstorming. I have commented on the hateful, vulgar posts some in the Q community direct at skeptics, and which others in the Q community do not disavow. It’s been going on since at least January.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.