Hahahahahahaha. Nice spin, Fantifa.
You need to apply at MSNBC. You can be Rachel Maddow's fluffer.
Tell me who said they know squat BEFORE the fact.
Bagster
Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Hahahahahahaha. Nice spin, Fantifa.
You need to apply at MSNBC. You can be Rachel Maddow's fluffer.
Tell me who said they know squat BEFORE the fact.
Bagster
Bagster
Your theory at least has merit. And you're doing what Q admonishes: Think logically! This is important!
All the same, and no offense, I still think that Q is Eric Cartman (aka EriQ Qartman):
Exposure (and prosecution) of the guilty is one kind of thing. Unrestrained false accusations is another kind of thing. I don’t doubt that there are plenty of prosecutions that need to take place, but is every govt official and Democrat part of secret pedo rings? The Q people seem to run far ahead of any evidence. Granted, it is one of the most difficult areas in which to gather evidence.
Literally the only word in any of your posts directed to me that I actually read is your screen name. I’ve told you this several times. You call me a liar [so as to convince yourself I’m actually reading your hate spews] because you are projecting. You lie so you assume others are lying too.
Bagster, you are a very dim bulb. You appear to have no life and an unlimited amount of time on your hands. You decidedly appear to have a pathological need to post to me. Otherwise why keep it up incessantly for so long after I’ve stopped reading your posts completely and told you so?
Here’s the dim bulb explanation. If I wanted someone to read my posts as much as you want me to read yours [and you obviously want this; otherwise you wouldn’t spend so much time posting to me] I would treat them with at least a bare minimum of respect. That would be the best way of ensuring an ongoing dialogue.
But you, like a not-very-bright child, just go full bore insults, nastiness and vulgarity. Why would anybody keep reading that slop? I don’t need it or want it in my mind; it’s toxic.
So I skip the posts you direct to me entirely. It’s the perfect and immanently satisfying sollution. But you, like an angry, frustrated, none-too-bright child will keep pouring your time and energy down the rathole. What a sad, pathetic testimony.
hahahahaha
you are so effing pitiful
sorry you being ignorant of the fact that it started with Q doesn’t make it untrue, nice try though scumbag
PS I sent you another “private” message if you’d like to share it with everyone
Haha! But is Cartman heavily invested in John Perry Barlow? Bannon is, which would explain Q’s bizarre fixation on Barlow’s death.
There’s more, but the Barlow stuff always stood out to me as a good, albeit strange, indicator.
Has anybody EVER said that they were?
There's plenty of evidence to suggest that there are MASSIVE international sex trafficking and child abdution/pedo trafficking rings. To call us "obsessed", as a criticism, "with pedos" for investigating it, identifying it, bringing it to light (if it truly exists) and stopping it, is very disappointing to hear.
It's denial and mockery as "conspiracy" of things like this that allows it to continue. At least do like I do. Allow for the possibility of it's existence and encourage those who seek to expose it to carry on.
I happen to believe it. Go google Epstein's island, Allison Mack, Keith Rainiere, and Nxivm for starters. That'll get you started down the sex trafficking rabbit hole. Go from there, if you're interested.
Also google Standard Hotel and see what comes up. If you dige enough, Adam Schiff's name might pop up. There's a lot of sick shit going on in this world that we have been unaware of. No b.s.
Obsessed with pedos you say? *Ptooey*
Bagster
Send me the cliff notes, please.
ThankQ
Bagster
It didn’t “start” with Q — there have been rumors for a very long time (before Q appeared on the scene even) that this was Ryan’s last term. I was expecting this before I ever heard of Q, so I guess I’m a prophet, too.
You have such a delusional sense of evidence and “proof” that it is impossible to conduct rational discussion with you. It’s as though you are missing a part of the brain.
The frontal Q.
spin spin spin, you being ignorant of where it started doesn’t change where it started, keep trying though you’re very convincing, NOT!
I see you lazy ass still hasn’t looked at the NYC foiled bombing or id you look and you’re pretending you didn’t cause that also proves you wrong?
What I never understood is Q apparently warned everyone but Barlow that Barlow was going to die. So if I’m Barlow, I’m thinking, Thanks for nothing, Q!
The Qers’ obsession with pedophilia is pervasive. They go into the creepiest and most exhaustive detail possible about how Hillary et al skin the kids, torture them, rape them, drink their blood and eat them. They go through that process relentlessly. They posted a film that supposedly showed a little girl crying bc she was about to have her organs harvested while she was still alive [I didn’t watch it or any of the other sick videos they’ve linked]. They actually believe there is a video of Hillary and Huma molesting and torturing to death a little girl. It just goes on and on.
Q has definitely targeted people who want to talk about pedophilia all day. I’ve pointed out that talking about it ad infinitum doesn’t actually stop a single act of pedophilia, but of course that’s not the point. The point is smearing the Rothschilds with the most hellish acts of child abuse possible—and the absence of even one shred of actual evidence has never slowed them down an inch.
Barlow was old an sick. It was the usual vague Q warning if something happened Q won; if nothing happened Q didn’t lose.
Now you speak as someone interested in reasonable discussion and investigation. I don’t know why you adopt the clowning Bagster approach the rest of the time. I swear, until now, I had no idea you conduct serious discussions.
I do suspect/believe that there is a great deal of pedo crap that needs to be exposed and punished. I am not sure that the Raniere stuff is too relevant, since it seems to deal with adult aged women, but the case does illustrate how perverted and determined perps can carry on really sick stuff in private unless exposed.
So if I predict my own death here on FR, and then do eventually die, I will pass into FReeper legend as Qevao?
That would be the best way of ensuring an ongoing dialogue.
What on earth makes you think I want an ongoing dialogue with the likes of YOU? Are you frikking kidding me? I can't stand stupid people, especially stupid, lying people.
I love honest people, even if they don't share my world view, which you apparently don't. But I could stand you if you are honest. Enchante and I disagree, but I can stand him. At least he's honest and when he says something I can believe he truly believes it. But you, and people like you, deliberately "spin" the truth to suit your needs.
So no, dear. I don't want a "dialogue" with you. I wouldn't want a dialogue with Hillary Clinton either, but I would relish (pickles, get it?) the chance to chat her up for a while and call her out on her bullshit. Just like I do you. You are so full of shit that your very existence offends me.
Your mission on this earth is to "call out deception" wherever you find it? Mine is to chastise liars. So here we are. Dialogue? Hahaha. See? You still talk like a liberal. gGo back to rehab, you're having a relapse.
Also. do you like how I tricked you into reading my post by the fake news title I put at the top? Ha. I got lots more up my sleeve. BTW, I know you read this. Cant fool me. I don't believe anything you say now that I know you lie.
Good day, Fantifa.
p.s. On the off chance that you really don't read my posts. Then understand that I'm not really writing for you, anyway, but for the broader audience. The world must be made aware of what you are.
Bagster
I have a small list of a few things Q has said that would directly happen. One of them is that Q assured us all that there are pictures of Obama, in full tribal garb holding an AK47 either pointing it at US service members or the US flag. Also, Q said Huma would be indicted. There are other vague things Q has alluded to and the the Qers on Reddit and other 24/7 Q sites have “figured out” as well that are more fanciful. Like the Hillary and Huma sex tape with children, the Picture of Obama in the newspaper with a young girl to mean he’s part of the global pedo cabal and possibly a spirit cooker, Hillary with an ankle bracelet, Podesta, I was assured by a Qer right here on FR, was at GITMO etc.
You are going to need to explain what you mean about Q and “NYC foiled bombing” if you want any discussion. It is you who seem to be claiming that Q predicted something or affected something, but I don’t know WTH you mean yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.