ThankQ, goodman.
:)
Bagster
Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Bagster,
Having recovered somewhat (I’m still a bit woozy) from your harsh debunking of me last night, I’m ready to bunk again.
Only this time, I leave aside the tongue-in-cheek banter to ask a serious question. And I would appreciate a serious reply, meaning something more thoughtful than “you’ve been debunked!”
After some six months of Q and all the adherents reading, studying, and discussing the “truth,” why is it you guys don’t have any more clue what’s going on than anyone else?
If Q is an ultimate insider with all the scoop, then why does he speak in riddles? Why not just reveal the truth in plaintext?
If the cryptic nature of his posts is because he dare not reveal the truth to you, then why does he encourage you to spend so much time decrypting his meaning? It’s almost as if he wants you to chase your tail instead of doing something productive with your life.
I pray for you.
ThankQ, goodman.
:)
Bagster
No problem.
Be careful, people will need you in their future. eye
Well I can tell you’re still looking at your lamp thinking it’s your computer.
It’s not just here
My son lives on alt right stuff on 4chan
Q is there too
Since you asked for a serious answer respectfully. Here it comes. You may not like it but it's an answer.
We actually do have a better clue of what's going on than most non Q people. Even FReepers, who are on average much more clued in than the "normies."
Going from the Q threads to the non Q threads on FR is like travelling back in time. We Qbirds have discussed issues, thanks to Q posts that many times hit the media and mainstream FR days if not weeks or months later.
One of the biggest examples off the top of my head is North Korea. We knew about Trump meeting with Kim in the forbidden city and making a deal with him weeks before any word of it came out.
There are many, many ways we are ahead of you guys. And I'm not saying that to sound arrogant, it's just true. I mean think about it. Most FReepers get their information from news articles, social media, and other forms of media, right?
Q provides questions that lead researchers from the chans and our very own FReeQs to dig deeper than that. It's like having a team of investigative journalists all working together and sharing information. But looking where you are not.
So, yea. Not to brag, but we are ten steps ahead of you AntiQs. This is just fact.
As for your question about why Q posts how he posts? I really am not going to explain all that. Ive done it so many times I'm sick of it. Maybe go read some of the links at the top of the Q thread for explanation. Or bone up for yourself. No disrespect, but it's just tiresome to have to go over the same old material for every person that comes along.
Anyway. I hope that answers your questions.
And just to be clear. I don't argue with you guys just for my entertainment, though it does amuse me to see you guys struggle and try. I, every once in a while, step out of my so called "bubble" to reach out and try to corral some of you smart FReepers that are going to waste out here in the wilderness.
A lot of you have great brains and could be a marvelous help to us FReeQs, Q, The Preaident, and America. I have a dream that all of FreeRepublic can come together and become the MAGA army that Q is asking for. That we, all together can fight this war. FR has been and can again be, a mighty force. We really shouldn't be fighting each other. The enemy is out there.
Just think about that, guys, before you bash Q or his adherents. This is not a game.
Where we go one, we go all.
Bagster
That comment was more mysterious than a Q post.
Bagster
Looking for new recruits are you? How much are you getting paid to upload these threads?
Yes, of course I'm looking for all patriots to fight on the same side. Aren't you?
What are you saying? That I'm on the wrong side of this somehow? Say it straight.
Bagster
And what does "upload these threads" mean?
Make posts? I've never heard of it referred to as "uploading threads" before.
Are you Chinese?
Bagster
Finally.....GAME ON!!!!!
:)
Bagster
I hope we can maintain this civility when I ask a couple more questions which you, as you say, "may not like." You posted:
"There are many, many ways we are ahead of you guys.
One of the biggest examples off the top of my head is North Korea. We knew about Trump meeting with Kim in the forbidden city and making a deal with him weeks before any word of it came out.
Did I miss a post here where you, or another Q adherent, announced -- in plaintext! -- this information weeks before word of it came out? Clearly not, because if you had revealed it when you first discovered it, then there never would have been a gap of weeks before "any word of it came out."
Therefore, you kept this information secret from the world for weeks until "it came out" some other way, whatever way that was.
Leaving aside how you knew this information weeks before anyone else, the question is, How did you guys keep it secret for so long? (Three people can keep a secret, if two of them are dead.)
Assuming you guys have the perfect discipline to keep such a secret for weeks, then one must ask, Why did you keep it secret for weeks?
It couldn't be by Q's order. If he didn't want the information public, then he wouldn't make his posts universally accessible for anyone in the world to decrypt.
Neither could it be by unanimous consent of the Q adherents, because Q's posts are ostensibly about getting the truth out to the People.
So what is it?
Oh, geez. Really?
Okay. Let's stay on NK just to make it easy. So Q is giving us all these clues about goings on in North Korea, right? People are digging, riddling, theorizing, looking at mainstream media reports, comparing, more theorizing. Then people analyze all the collected data as best they can.
THEN...some people say. Hey, I think this happened or that happened. Other people look at that and say, hey. That fits. Yep. That's what happened. And this is what will be the most likely outcome of that. Then. Two weeks later, or a month....BOOM. It happens.
North Korea announces it will de nukelify and make peace with South Korea...
When CNN announces it, or the NY Times or Fox News. Then YOU know it. The Q birds that have been paying attention KNEW, about as close as anybody not actually involved can know. It's not like I (for example) knew beyond a doubt that it would happen.
So do you see how your question itself is the wrong question? You are looking at the whole Q thing wrongly. That's what's so frustrating about you guys. You see Q one way, we see it a whole nother way. And never the twain shall meet, apparently.
So no. I didn't go out and say a month ago. North Korea has met with Donald Trump secretly and arranged a deal with China brokering and backing it. They will announce it in a month.
And it works like that with just about all of the other Q stuff.
Bagster
:)
It's basically getting the raw feed before a blogger or other 'source' puts it together and it gets posted on FR.
A lot of confusion results from all of the noise and multiple conclusions, not all of which are well thought out. There is definite lunatic fringe that camps out, including some well meaning but kookoo Truthers.
There was quite an echo chamber on this thread for a while from the usual suspects - it was like they were afraid of drowning clinging to each other but not trusting the lifebouy offered.
You must admit that “We knew about Trump meeting with Kim in the forbidden city and making a deal with him weeks before any word of it came out” comes off as very matter-of-fact, thus my questions at which you to umbrage.
What you say now is that you did not, in fact, know this would take place for a certainty beforehand. Only that, once it was announced, Hey! all these disparate pieces of info I knew beforehand now fit together and make perfect sense in hindsight.
And if that is not a mischaracterization of where you are at, then I have nothing critical to say of you or the Q.
It takes connecting the dots and applying logic to establish things as "fact" absent main stream news reports. And that type of thing happens a lot in the Q spectrum of analysis. You are certainly aware of the fake news media and how they report.
So Q is like reading a newspaper that nobody else gets to see. That's pretty much it. Straight up predictions, like the antiQs keep harping on, aren't really how it works.
Anyway, that's how I see it.
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.