Who is #Qanon? (really interesting 19:30 video)

YouTube ^ | 4/27/2018 | Titus Frost

[Beave Meister]

This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.

[Fantasywriter]

‘Also, some of Q’s sillier moments have to do with old CIA programs “MKULTRA” and “Operation Mockingbird.”

These were exposed and “supposedly” shut down completely in the ‘70s. Of course, I would not put it past the CIA to have revived/extended/expanded such programs in some form or other. BUT they certainly wouldn’t be going under THOSE code names after they were so publicly exposed and disgraced in the ‘70s. The fact that Q thinks those particular code names are still current and relevant indicates that he is versed in web-based conspiracy accounts but NOT in the least knowledgeable about any current CIA or secretive intel activities. For the CIA would never be using those code names NOW. If in fact the CIA has continued such programs they most surely would be under new code names and auspices. Therefore, Q is merely relying upon what he has read about those programs operating many decades ago.’

Intriguing! You’re burning down the house tonight—so much information, and all of it excellent. I can’t believe there’s actually educational material on a Q thread; usually it’s just echo chamber fluff interspersed with invective. Thanks for cutting through the smoke and mirrors and revealing so much more about the racket—it’s eye-opening.

[eyedigress]

It will be alright. Just continue on. We do live in interesting times, and we will know it.

[caww]

That’s a stretch don’t you think?...that is IF you’re thinking tonight.

[bagster]

But the Q-drop tries to make it sound like we could keep 3 (not 4) carrier groups on station in the western Pacific all the time,

Like everybody else, you interpret one question to mean what you want it to mean. Q didn't make it sound like we could keep 3 or 4 carrier groups on station "all the time." Obviously we moved assets (I have no idea which) into the area as a show of force. Which helped bring Kim to the current state we are in.

If carriers were moved to the area at the time, why do you think they would be there "all the time." Where did you get that one? Not from Q. Everybody that analyzes Q comes up with their own interpretations and analysis. Some more worthy than others. You are no exception.

Also, I am not hear to answer for every piece of Q interpretation. There are many more knowledgeable experts on the Q threads than me. I'm more of a public relations officer. Laundry and morale, really. I am here to counter-act you anti Q propagandists. I'm doing quite well, don't you think?

Keep your mind open. There's hope for you yet. Also, stop finding one thing to base your debunkery on. Check out the whole package and make your analysis.

Word to the wise.

Also, my level of seriousness is not for you to dictate. I work in mysterious ways and one such as you cannot hope to understand the wily ways of my level of gung fu.

Bagster

[bagster]

Q is short for Queer-Cocks for Hillary.

Good job tricking me into giving you a serious answer. Score one for you. I thought you were making an honest inquiry so I gave you an honest, serious answer. I didn't realize you were just another dirty mouth Q denying slowby ass-tard.

I will not make that mistake again.

Bagster

[eyedigress]

You live on this board. Your fung-goo is a bit stringy.

[Enchante]

"let me know when you or your cult ever attempt to debate"

I have been waiting patiently for hours for you and/or "edzo4" (or anyone else) to explain where I go wrong in #319. Are you guys even honest? You pretend to be interested in understanding these matters, but you are giving no serious evidence of that. Unlike you folks, I am perfectly willing, even eager, to be corrected. Education is a life-long for all of us, or it should be. But so far, no one is able to explain/defend the alleged competence of the Q-drop which EDZO4 quoted on this thread and which I discussed in #319. I say Q is an amateur and a clown. If you can't even overturn my #319 then you have exactly zero chance of ever defending Q adequately.

[bagster]

I have been so reviled by the Q-cult, both on threads and in FReepmail,

There's no crying in FReepland. Works both ways, Enchante.

Buck up, buttercup. Rub some dirt on it, and get back in the game.

Bagster

[eyedigress]

You gave me a serious answer?

When?
I asked 3 questions. You did not answer.

Phhhttt

[bagster]

which is why they can’t appear to garner what’s needed to engage with you.

Here's the deal, professor. We are too busy trying to figure stuff out to have to stop and explain things to people who could just go find out for themselves. And especially not to people who have an obvious hostile agenda. What's the point in wasting our breath?

If you really wanted your questions answered, you would read, study, and discuss in an adult manner like the rest of us do. But that's now what you want, is it? Be honest.

All ya'll can drop the innocent act.

I went from team skeptic to team Q. You can too.

Bagster

[Enchante]

Q’s phrase was “prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition”....

The carrier exercise was only for a few DAYS. This “transition” wrt North Korea is taking place over many many months, if not years.

[eyedigress]

Answer my questions.

[bagster]

Intriguing! You’re burning down the house tonight—so much information,

Haha. Fantasy your ass-kissery and ballyhooing is comical. He didn't share any information. He just said that he thinks that Q thinks that MKultra and Operation Mockingbird were actual programs at one time (they were) and that they were ostensibly shut down (they were) but that they may still be operational (they are) and Q is so stupid that he thinks they are still under the same names (they aren't and he never said they were).

Where is this information you speak of in his post. If you want information on those programs and their current state, go to the Q threads. It has been discussed muchly.

You are easily impressed if somebody agrees with you. Not so much if they don't.

Bagster

[bagster]

Blow me.

[eyedigress]

You may want to also explain who the hell “Team Skeptic” is.

[Lurkina.n.Learnin]

Well, that’s a succinct answer.

[bagster]

I asked 3 questions. You did not answer.

Scroll up, bojangles. I'm not here to hold your hand.

Bagster

[eyedigress]

Blow me.

That's it? Maybe Q will talk again tomorrow, stay tuned.

[bagster]

Right?

I pride myself on my succinctness.

Bagster

[bagster]

stay tuned.

Same Q time. Same Q channel.

Bagster