Like everybody else, you interpret one question to mean what you want it to mean. Q didn't make it sound like we could keep 3 or 4 carrier groups on station "all the time." Obviously we moved assets (I have no idea which) into the area as a show of force. Which helped bring Kim to the current state we are in.
If carriers were moved to the area at the time, why do you think they would be there "all the time." Where did you get that one? Not from Q. Everybody that analyzes Q comes up with their own interpretations and analysis. Some more worthy than others. You are no exception.
Also, I am not hear to answer for every piece of Q interpretation. There are many more knowledgeable experts on the Q threads than me. I'm more of a public relations officer. Laundry and morale, really. I am here to counter-act you anti Q propagandists. I'm doing quite well, don't you think?
Keep your mind open. There's hope for you yet. Also, stop finding one thing to base your debunkery on. Check out the whole package and make your analysis.
Word to the wise.
Also, my level of seriousness is not for you to dictate. I work in mysterious ways and one such as you cannot hope to understand the wily ways of my level of gung fu.
Bagster