Posted on 05/02/2018 9:42:10 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Each live stream video remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronym definitions to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
That should read -”is to be expected.
And a few years ago Dems tried to remove death penalty for treason.
THEY FAILED HA HA HA HA!
What are we missing?
The riddle of the LIGHT is solved. Donald Trump is revealed.
The night is dark, and full of terrors.
Bagster
One of the youtubers had a hypothesis that the plane cargo to HK was the keys (servers)to the Apple cloud.
That crash definitely would have registered on any nearby seismometers...
Caveat: There's a video of a crash -- taken from a moving vehicle --on YouTube -- of a swept-wing jet "pancaking" beside a highway. Although labeled, "C-130 crash", that jet, obviously, is not a straight-winged turboprop C-130. FAKE NEWS!!
*
um anon
Call went out to release the contents of VAULT 7.
Immediately
That thought crossed my mind at some point last night. It’s probably why Q did not post anything except the pictures. The pics were meant for someone specific, not necessarily us.
Good bet the clowns are involved as it has something to do with China.
It may be one of those things we find out about at a later date, OR Not!
;-)
Assuming for the moment your thesis is correct. The flaw is that Apple's iPhones historically have not had OLED screens until the iPhone X which was released just in November of 2017. Samsung has had them for about eight years.
In answer to your question as to what is "organic" about OLED, they have a CARBON base rather than a SILICON base. in the past Apple has eschewed the use of OLED screens because the colors they produced were too saturated for reproduction of reality. Only now has the technology in OLED advanced enough to actually reproduce an image that looks almost exactly as the scene/Image looks in real life. As a result the iPhone X was rated by Displaymate, the organization that rates the quality of screens, as the best they had ever seen in every metric.
The other thing to consider is that Q is setting Apple aside from the other cellular phone makers as being different, not the same. Apple has locked down its devices and makes them factory encrypted with 256 bit AES encrypted from end-to-end for which only the user has the key, not even Apple can unlock them without that key. Only recently has someone come up with a means to get around Apple's passcode multiple attempts at breaking in. . . and even that GreyBox GreyKey approach will be blocked before too long, and can now be ameliorated by users by the simple means of opting for a complex passcode that includes alphanumeric and symbolic characters with the normal numeric characters. That alone will cause the time to break into the iPhone to increase from hours to decades or centuries, even with a passcode of only seven or eight characters as there are a potential 223 characters that can be used.
However, I suspect Apple will very quickly patch the vulnerability that GreyBox is using to bypass the maximum number of passcode tries.
Great-I’ll have margarita and nachos.
Agree.
Thanks for posting the Pic - I’m too techno challenged. I did think that was an odd “coincidence”.
Yes, I read that it was to be the plane’s last flight. Unfortunately, it was also the last one for the people on it.
Gosh, I think you know more is going on.
Bagster
Exactly: A land and sea box. . . a shipping container. One that can be taken directly off a ship (the sea portion) and loaded onto a semi-truck trailer rig (the land portion) for further transport. The often have plywood lining or even padding for protection of the contents, depending on what they are carrying. Some are refrigerated and would definitely be insulated.
Thanks for finding that photo. . . but it also proves that it would not be a shipment from Apple, unless it is computers, as Apple doesn't ship small devices via ocean transport, but rather flies them by cargo plane.
These shipping containers are not well sealed. . . and one storm could water damage the contents. Also Apple is a "just in time" inventory management company. They want inventory delivered rapidly, not at the vagaries of an ocean voyage and seaport shipping.
If you read G’s pictures down it may make more sense:
Picture:
1. This involves Apple in China.
2. A temperature controlled container is being loaded in China. The contents may or may not be heavy, they are very secure with a heavy skid and a lot of extra packing materials. The do not want them to move. Conclusion is that they are of very high value.
3. The destination is Apple in Cupertino.
4. The plane is seen in a landing pattern in CA for delivery.
Organic materials of very high value being shipped by Apple for later sale?
. anything that comes with the backing of MA is guaranteed to be EVIL
*************************************************************
True. I have yet to see one picture of her that doesn’t look evil and creepy.
Thousands of people go missing in the United States each year and many are never heard from again.
According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, roughly 800,000 children are reported missing each year in the United States -- that's roughly 2,000 per day. Of those, there are 115 child "stranger abduction" cases each year, which means the child was taken by an unknown person.
Obviously 115 are KNOWN to be stranger abductions because the person seen or otherwise known to take the child was a stranger to the viewer, person reporting the abductino, or the child. But "many are never heard from again" may also be stranger abductions, runaways taken by who knows who, etc. The idea that ALL missing children other than 115 are NOT stranger abduction cannot be accurate. That would mean all the rest are either runaways or taken by relatives or other known individuals.
What I would like to know is numbers of how many are recovered and how many are not. The article has almost no facts and most of it is vignettes on missing children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.