Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Just because the wood is that old, doesn’t mean the sculpture is that old.


8 posted on 04/27/2018 8:01:00 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

Good point. But nobody would use an old log when there are thousands of new trees standing around.


11 posted on 04/27/2018 8:03:14 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
A breath of common sense
15 posted on 04/27/2018 8:11:58 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (,uld')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Exactly.

The tree may have been very old at the time it was carved....................I could carve a face on a redwood tree that’s over 2000 years old, but that wouldn’t make my carving 2000 years old....................


16 posted on 04/27/2018 8:13:08 AM PDT by Red Badger (Remember all the great work Obama did for the black community?.............. Me neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
Just because the wood is that old, doesn’t mean the sculpture is that old.

You expect wood carvers to use wood that is thousands of years old? ROFLMBO.

43 posted on 04/27/2018 10:12:33 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson