Q Anon: (4/2/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 4/2/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

[tang-soo]

For this one, the crash was due to wing icing. So somehow disable the system or systems that takes care of that. They SAY it was due to wing icing. “They” said another crash was due to an explosion in the center wing tank. If nothing else, I’ve come to the point where I believe nothing THEY say.

I will repeat a posting from earlier in this thread ...

I listened to an interview some time ago with Field McConnell (Abel Danger) about his sister, Kristine Marcy (key player in SES) when he claimed one of the dark projects she oversaw involved the remote control of aircraft, being able to spoof them into the ground. If you search with the following terms, you will find articles.

field mcconnell marcy aircraft

Also, if I'm not mistaken, a few weeks ago, Q or one of the anons made a claim that only a small percentage of aircraft failures were truly accidental - implying the vast majority are due to deliberate tampering. I think it was either 90 or 95 percent.

[TEXOKIE]

Wow.... I’m having memory that in one of the early drops about AS, the importance of the timeline was brought to our attention.

[STARLIT]

Not sure why he used Bold Type..he’s getting a lot of Attention from All the sewer for his type selection.

[TEXOKIE]

LOL! excellent point!

[STARLIT]

Gosh, I admire that man!!

[Me Either]

BFL

[fatima]

Thanks GYPSY286.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Is that from John -you can do it if you call it a tax- Roberts?

[TEXOKIE]

Uninterruptable Auto Pilot Control. Likely meant to be used in case a terrorist took over the cockpit. Used to be a patent you could look up. IIRC, goes back to client from Rose Law Firm days.
~ ~ ~ ~

I’m not even stunned to learn that. I should be - but I’m not.

[STARLIT]

I think the real question that needs to be investigated...WHAT made him insist on NOT having security around. He shouldn’t have HAD a choice..he works for the People of the US in one of the most important roles.

[STARLIT]

White House Fox reporter John Roberts.

[generally]

BTW, Has anyone else noticed that in 2 of last night’s posts, there were 3 As in kill boxes?

[A][A][A]

But not all in a row. Scattered in the message.

Any guesses? TxnMA?

[TEXOKIE]

See my previous reply about auto pilot- identical to this one.

[TEXOKIE]

LOL! that’s great!

[HarleyLady27]

I do too...

[reformedliberal]

Again, we have information (which looks quite accurate, but what do I know) from AIM (”Q is a Psyop”). Is A.I.M. and ‘Aim4Truth’ the same people?

Until someone not tainted with overt agenda confirms all this (the conspiracy part), I’ll personally take it under advisement and not share without strong caveat.

I’m told patent law is quite arcane. Even the drawings ae only allowed to be done by specialized draftsmen and the attorneys charge above the going rate for the usual business services. I once tried to get a patent on something and the attorney set all my red flags and alarms blaring at 11+. When he realized I did not have deep pockets, he suggested a *design patent* and terminated the conversation.

I am suspicious of IoT and ready to believe the worst of the political figures named. But I want evidence that isn’t circumstantial.

For instance: IIRC, Abel Danger maintains Hillary, Michelle and I forget which other First Ladies have a group that owns the sensor patent. I can’t find any authoritative evidence.

This article says it’s an engineer who publicly owns patents while working for a DS/CIA front. Unless he’s a strawman paid off to be a cut-out, this looks shifty in an evidentiary sense.

BTW, who/what would be the trusted remote activity controller? Military personnel? CIA? The schematics shows something so large as to be suspiciously unwieldy. Too hackable, as well.

The ‘personal viewing device’ looks like SmartGlasses or whatever they were called. I’ve seen articles on contacts with web access, too.Pretty simplistic drawing, if that’s supposed to be the super-sophisticated patent drawing.

[9YearLurker]

I found this tweet reassuring:

@jcreechy 2h2 hours ago
Replying to @WWG1WGA

Google technician here. I can confirm.

The Q team are using a set of Virtual Machines (VM) to “hop” from device to device, keeping the source and location secure.

So they use one computer to access another computer at a different location, and so on down the chain.

[xone]

None of these cases are going to be before a military tribunal. The hurdles to get there are huge, likely insurmountable, and the general military vs. civilian differences such as limit access to evidence for military reasons and reduced standard of proof aren't necessary, and would be seen as stacking the deck against the defendants.

I see tribunals. Last treason was. These were acts of war against the people of the US. The 'political baggage' will be minimized once the true character of these SOBs is revealed. No widespread outcry for the serial abusers of children who also dabbled in treason and sedition.

[defconw]

Maybe that was exactly why he chose it! It’s fun to troll trolls, no?

[TEXOKIE]

Exactly! I’ve been pointing that out too. Thanks for the link.