Replies

For this one, the crash was due to wing icing. So somehow disable the system or systems that takes care of that. They SAY it was due to wing icing. “They” said another crash was due to an explosion in the center wing tank. If nothing else, I’ve come to the point where I believe nothing THEY say.

I will repeat a posting from earlier in this thread ...

I listened to an interview some time ago with Field McConnell (Abel Danger) about his sister, Kristine Marcy (key player in SES) when he claimed one of the dark projects she oversaw involved the remote control of aircraft, being able to spoof them into the ground. If you search with the following terms, you will find articles.

field mcconnell marcy aircraft

Also, if I'm not mistaken, a few weeks ago, Q or one of the anons made a claim that only a small percentage of aircraft failures were truly accidental - implying the vast majority are due to deliberate tampering. I think it was either 90 or 95 percent.

That Q has clearly referred to this crash in his #985 is a very strong indication to me that there is far more to be known about this crash than meets the eye and that ost seems to indicate that H-> was involved if not a causative influence.

In the first White House Press Briefing of 2018, at the 19:09 timestamp", a reporter asks what appears to be a rather mundane question. It is not. In the current hyper-antagonistic political environment nothing is innocent; like peeling an onion, there are multiple layers of mischief in every inquiry, each one hidden by the last. (This truly is war by other means.) NBC News White House Correspondent Peter Alexander set the stage when he asked Sarah Sanders, “There hasn't been a US commercial airline fatal crash in the country since 2009, so does President Obama deserve credit for that long stretch?"

Clearly, McAlexander was attempting to credit Obama and his corrupt FAA Administrator, who was at the time already a year-long hold-over into the Trump Administration, Michael Huerta (I used the word "corrupt," as the evidence is clear), but when I did a bit more research (as I'm wont to do), I noticed the "Eckert" flight, which, if it had been included in McAlexander's representation would have completely changed what an honest person would dare say. Nonetheless, with all factors reasonably considered, Trump had the better average record, to which the BHO-admin's averaged record would only add tarnish to Trump's.

That MSM/NBC McAlexander would coyly leave this particular crash out in an effort to aid the perception of Obama is no surprise. His entire mini-presentation was clearly the result of a lot of thoughtful posturing and word smithing. If Peter's work could be the bum's rush at the door to keep a corrupt hold-over in place, it could be worth billions.

Obama's handlers almost certainly participated in McAlexander's misleading, "out-there" construct.

To draw a temporary point to this story, let me be clear that Obama has by this time developed a history of treasonous manipulation of false aviation "accidents."

He's done no less than use the military to help manipulate the evidence. He's corruptly used the FAA, NTSB and other aviation companies in furtherance of political ends, costing American taxpayers and shareholders scores of millions of dollars.

I'll leave you with two YouTube videos. First, a short version (10 minute) showing military involvement in hiding the Fuddy's hoaxed "accident." The second, a lengthier (21-minute) version that incorporates how others, including the pilot, passengers, NTSB, FAA and others played their facilitating roles.