Stirring the pot here a little. Back to the Peter Thiel and Palantir Technologies that was being discussed before thread blew uo into religion and existentialiam. /s
Palantir Technologies . . . Think . . . Predictive behaviour. Past predicts future.
Is Palantir part of Q? Of course I really do not know, but my answer is . . . duh!
Admittedly the only evidence I have is:
Peter Thiel's Palantir wins $876-million U.S. Army contract for battlefield software
Palantir Technolgies, is a critical element to the puzzle. From my understand Palantir is the next generation of data mining. I myself, technology challenged do not profess to have full understanding of its workings, but when Thiel says things like "an moral and ethics committee should be required" with the functioning of the software. Even I get that.
Palantir Technologies is more than all the data mining programs that we know about to date..
Challenge . . . google Palantir Technologies + Predictive Behavior
Palantirs New Patents Shed Rare Light On Its Data Methods
Excerpt . . .
Palantirs prediction tech builds off the mantra that past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. Specifically, the tech described can acquire data on a subject, create a record of the subjects behavior, extrapolate past behaviors into features that color the subjects actions, and then use the data to train a prediction model that spits out the likelihood that the subject will take specific actions in the future.
Much much more . . .
Note . . . if one googles Peter Thiel Palantir Technologies, you get a whole other set of articles, of which some are clearly "planted" stories by deep state to push back the narrative
Dissenting1
Looks like you were onto something and I was very wrong to go in on you. You have my apologies.
Bagster
That looks like it could be a very big deal, say what. And I called the guy that tried to bring it to our attention a troll. I suck.
You think its the new MKultra???
Past predicts future.
Looking at that in a more sinister way, using some sort of predictive algorithm to determine if someone is prone to behave poorly could be used as a reason to deny that person their constitutionally enumerated rights. What if the left co-opted such a technology to predict who was likely to be a Righty versus a lefty, and then used that prediction to deny, say, second amendment rights.
Seems like Facebook/YouTube and all are the perfect proving grounds to perfect the algorithm that would be used. Witness how they are censoring conservative voices in those venues. It wouldnt be too large a reach to see the same characteristics used to deny gun ownership to their political enemies.
Can you say “Black Swans.”