To: Dissident1
ping to post #1675
Dissenting1
Looks like you were onto something and I was very wrong to go in on you. You have my apologies.
Bagster
1,679 posted on
03/30/2018 5:18:59 PM PDT by
bagster
(Even bad men love their mamas.)
To: ransomnote; Dissident1; JockoManning; steve w; SkyPilot; Cboldt; grey_whiskers; No_Doll_i; ...
Ping to post 1675 by saywhatagain. Potentially Yuge and BOOM. To my knowledge, Freeper Dissenting1 was on it last night.
Past proves present ongoing Q theme since early times. Maybe new incarnation of MkUltra. I don't understand significance myself yet. Come solve puzzle.
1,690 posted on
03/30/2018 5:33:28 PM PDT by
bagster
(Even bad men love their mamas.)
To: bagster
I think Q's use of "past proves future" is little more than another way of saying "these people are stupid."
I do agree there is an inferential chain from past proves future to Palantir (predictive software) to Peter Thiel, I don't see Q's use of past proves future as intended to be driven to that chain.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson