Q Anon: (3/24/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/24/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

The following Youtube group goes live when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. Their live video remains active as long as they have new insights, information or guests to offer.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted; you can send the president an email message. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[Califreak]

Red Green Alliance?

[WildHighlander57]

See txinma’s post:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3642244/posts?page=352#352

[greeneyes]

Oh I forgot. Yes with respect to names. The first name is usually biblical - like a Saint or something. The middle name is generally the Mother if it’s a first daughter. The middle name is also the name they are generally called.

So she is not following traditional procedure if she goes by Angela, because that would have been using the name Dorothea.

[greeneyes]

Saw it. Confirmation of what I thought Fake Blogger News.

[Bigg Red]

I am inclined to agree with you.

[greeneyes]

Me too. More interested in current actions and plans that past history that we can’t really prove one way or another.

[saywhatagain]

Good read . . . I too as others here, tend to see events past and unfolding through the prism of bbible prophecy.

"With respect to names"

The naming of Angela appears to be the key. In our previous research, Angela Dorothea Kasne does NOT follow traditional values of that time. That appears to be the "red flag."

It appears, anon has made the connection. Consider.

The thing that leads to Saxe-Coburg-Gotha is that Merkel was born Angela Dorothea Kasner. In those days German names ran in families according to certain rules. Hitler's sister was Angela and she had a daughter Angela "Geli" Raubal who was Hitler's mistress.

To follow what is being suggested, we go to German Naming Patterns web site.

German families often used the following pattern for naming children. Again, though, there were several variations used, and often the pattern was disrupted by other circumstances. When a duplicate name occurred in these patterns, the next name in the pattern was usually used. Often when a child died in infancy, his/her name was reused for the next child of the same gender. Too, a child's name was sometimes repeated when a spouse died and the surviving spouse remarried and had more children. This would result in half-siblings with the same name.

Taking from Wikipedia, Angela in my opinion a devoted marxist. She denies that.

Merkel was educated at Karl Marx University, Leipzig, where she studied physics from 1973 to 1978.[22]. At school, she learned to speak Russian fluently, and was awarded prizes for her proficiency in Russian and Mathematics.[31]

At the Academy of Sciences, she became a member of its FDJ secretariat. According to her former colleagues, she openly propagated Marxism as the secretary for "Agitation and Propaganda".[29] However, Merkel has denied this claim

[greeneyes]

Your chart: I read that whole thing back when I researched this. As I said, the first name was generally biblical. The middle name was after a family member according to the chart.

Hence the name you should be looking for is Dorothea, if they used the pattern. This info is found under the chart like the one you posted I am posting it for you to read:

Birth/ Baptismal Names

Two names were usually given to a child at birth or baptism. In Germany, the first name - what we often refer to as a given name - was a spiritual name, usually to honor a favorite saint. The spiritual name was often used repeatedly in families.

The second name - what we now would refer to as a middle name - was a secular or call name, and was the name by which the person was known.

One of the most common and heavily used saint’s names for males was “Johann” (with no “s”), and for females, “Johanna” or “Anna”.

Thus, in a hypothetical German family, we might see the male children named:

Johann Heinrich Riepe
Johann Hermann Riepe
Johann Friedrich Riepe

Respectively, these children would be known as Heinrich (Henry), Hermann, and Friedrich

Hope this clarifies what I am saying. When you go looking, look for Dorothea not necessarily Angela.

[saywhatagain]

I agree with the idea first name "spiritual/biblical a la Angela. Merkel being the first born so we are looking for her mother' mother name

According to wiki . . . Am going to post both sides just to be complete

Her paternal grandfather, Ludwik Kaźmierczak, He married Merkel's grandmother Margarethe, a German from Berlin. In 1930, they Germanized the Polish name Kaźmierczak to Kasner.

Merkel's maternal grandparents were Willi Jentzsch, and Gertrud Alma née Drange,

So if I understand . . . Angela's middle name, IF they followed tradition should have been Gertrud . . .

So either they did not follow tradition (possible, not probable) then what Q is suggesting is that things are not what they appear. And as you say we are looking for someone whose name is Dorothea?

Did I repeat that back correctly? Lol

[greeneyes]

Yes that’s correct. I believe the suggestion that is being made is that Merkel was not the biological offspring of those people who raised her. Hence you should be looking for some one named Dorothea - possibly related to Rothschild in some fashion.

[trebb]

Thanks for the day brightener..

[saywhatagain]

Thats appears to be the suggestion from the Q post. But to date no one can seem to bring it home.

[greeneyes]

So since it’s late, and not many are up and about, I’ll tell you an interesting story I heard - likely an urban legend.

Merkel is afraid of dogs. So Putin once presented her with a little stuffed dog. When she visited Russia, after she was seated, Putin let in his dogs - Dobermans maybe can’t remember for sure but of that type.

She was petrified, but didn’t say anything. Meanwhile Putin sat there in an Alpha Male pose-grinning like a Cheshire cat.

[greeneyes]

Well like I said to me it matters not. What is she today? She's a globalist and since she attended that ceremony at Cern, one has to wonder exactly what the devil she thinks of that pathetic waste of money.

Globalists by their nature are not really for the interests of their people. They are about consolidating their power. These middle managers such as Merkel sometimes get to thinking that they don't have to be a puppet, and then the real masters get rid of them.

One also has to wonder about the so called ruling council. When push comes to shove, which one is going to get to be the world ruler, and how many of their colleagues will they be willing to kill to get there?

[Cboldt]

-- How would this Sir John have any legal standing in the US? --

Technically, "standing" isn't the word you are looking for, I don't think. "Standing" is an attribute of each of the opposing sides in a lawsuit, usually the plaintiff, the one who starts the suit.

A simple standing example would be you suing my neighbor for trespassing on my lad. I have standing because I was trespassed. Unless you have an interest in my property and rights, you have no standing - in that suit.

In the case of "The Commission on Pedophilia," I think the question is "what is it's legal authority and power?"

In that interview, Robert David Steele expresses that the Commission isn't "recognized" by any jurisdiction. It was not formed by any government or government-recognized body (e.g., UN). It was self-formed by interested and concerned citizens.

As such, the Commission and its members have the same authority any ordinary citizen does. This isn't zero, and the power of this sort of activity to effect arrests and clean up government depends on many factors, roughly boiling down to credibility and publicity.

"Natural Law" as used in this context is the concept that law exists, and it is for people to find it. Natural Law and Sir William Blackstone.

[Cboldt]

-- How would this Sir John have any legal standing in the US? --

Also mentioned in the video is ThinThread, another rabbit hole worth digging into. This morning is the first time I have read of this.

Shocking revelations in the video.

"We've got it all"

"Trump 2.0"

[JockoManning]

Much appreciate your meaty & accurate posts. Thanks.

[JockoManning]

Thanks for your insightful points on such matters.

[CatQuilt]

I don’t think any of us realized what Trump was going to be up against and what he’s battling. It’s really amazing.

[Cboldt]

Pressley v. Casar - TX Supreme Court Case 17-0052 - Docket

The case is an attack on the use of certain types of voting machines. Texas AG Paxton is in favor of the Texas Supreme Court hearing and deciding the issue.