Q Anon: (3/22/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/22/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

[xone]

ph

[aMorePerfectUnion]

txhurl, it was by request. Your opinion is noted.

[saywhatagain]

Has any one checked this out and understand the meaning and purpose? I am seeing it around, without explanation. apparently written after the signing of the bill. May have some supporting docs from anons. will see. It may be kinda important

Text of a Letter from the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate

[FlossieBuzz]

Just finished listening to this. Amazing. This guy must have had a crystal ball. So much of what he says is happening now. The hair on the back of my neck is still standing up.

2 hours long. He sounds kooky at first, with the alien stuff. But bare with him. He is talking in 1992, about current events today in 2018. Well worth your time.

Bill Cooper interview CNN Uncut original

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOlybRtTnpM

[defconw]

Where the heck are you? Are you OK?

[SkyPilot]

I looked as well. I believe Cboldt found it.

Go to http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3641754/posts?page=1736#1736

But if that isn't it, realize this: Trump himself said the bill didn't fund the border wall, and that was one of the main reasons he wanted to veto it (but he didn't).

"I am considering a VETO of the Omnibus Spending Bill based on the fact that the 800,000 plus DACA recipients have been totally abandoned by the Democrats (not even mentioned in Bill) and the BORDER WALL, which is desperately needed for our National Defense, is not fully funded."
5:55 AM - 23 Mar 2018

So there you have it - from the horse's mouth.

There is article after article, and Congressman after Congressman - who say the bill prohibits building the wall. Even if the language is not there, if it isn't funded in the bill, Trump cannot spend the money to do it (that would be against the law).

So - I guess it ain't happenin, unless Trump thinks he has some sort of trick up his sleeve. He may, but it doesn't look good. I guess he can try a "National Security" angle - but......well. Let's just say that is not only going to be a massive fight, I think the MSM/Left calls for Impeachment will go bananas.

[SkyPilot]

That 1985 bill is also referred to as Gramm-Rudman-Hollings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm%E2%80%93Rudman%E2%80%93Hollings_Balanced_Budget_Act

I haven't heard about that for years.

The Acts provided for automatic spending cuts ("cancellation of budgetary resources", called "sequestration") if the total discretionary appropriations in various categories exceed in a fiscal year the budget spending thresholds.[4] That is, if Congress enacts appropriation bills providing for discretionary outlays in each fiscal year that exceed the budget totals, unless Congress passes another budget resolution increasing the budget amount, an across-the-board spending cut in discretionary expenditure is automatically triggered on these categories, affecting all departments and programs by an equal percentage. The amount exceeding the limit is held back by the Treasury and not transferred to the agencies specified in the appropriation bills.[5] Under the 1985 Act, allowable deficit levels were calculated for the eventual elimination of the federal deficit. If the budget exceeded the allowable deficit, across-the-board cuts were required. Directors of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) were required to report to the Comptroller General regarding their recommendations for how much must be cut. The Comptroller General then evaluated these reports, made his own conclusion, and gave a recommendation to the President, who was then required to issue an order effecting the reductions required by the Comptroller General unless Congress made the required cuts by other ways within a specified amount of time.

Trump may be trying to sequester domestic spending.

[MNDude]

What an unfortunate fool. He becomes a representative of the cabal probably only weeks before it becomes as despised as much as Nazis are

[MNDude]

WOW!

[Duchess47]

This is the basics I think. Page 673-674

16 SEC. 230. (a) Of the amount made available in this
17 Act under ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border Protection—Pro
18 curement, Construction, and Improvements’’,
19 $1,571,000,000 shall be available only as follows:
20 (1) $251,000,000 for approximately 14 miles of
21 secondary fencing, all of which provides for cross
22 barrier visual situational awareness, along the south
23 west border in the San Diego Sector;

674

1 (2) $445,000,000 for 25 miles of primary pe
2 destrian levee fencing along the southwest border in
3 the Rio Grande Valley Sector;
4 (3) $196,000,000 for primary pedestrian fenc
5 ing along the southwest border in the Rio Grande
6 Valley Sector;
7 (4) $445,000,000 for replacement of existing
8 primary pedestrian fencing along the southwest bor
9 der;
10 (5) $38,000,000 for border barrier planning
11 and design; and
12 (6) $196,000,000 for acquisition and deploy13
ment of border security technology.
14 (b) The amounts designated in subsection (a)(2)
15 through (a)(4) shall only be available for operationally ef
16 fective designs deployed as of the date of the Consolidated
17 Appropriations Act, 2017, (Public Law 115–31), such as
18 currently deployed steel bollard designs, that prioritize
19 agent safety.

[saywhatagain]

Ok . . . now put that letter from the white house (Post 2,083) to this provision. Is there a connection and how is it to be interpreted

[Califreak]

That would be a beautiful thing.

[SkyPilot]

Not sure. Gramm - Rudmann is still on the books, it it has been ignored for decades. Perhaps Trump has found a way to put the screws to some discretionary spending, but we will have to see.

[Diogenesis]

"These are my MK-ULTRA eyes."

[STARLIT]

Peace Thru Strength ‏ -

.@drawandstrike .@_VachelLindsay_ .@ThomasWictor Gentlemen, the Omnibus mentions $ and access to records & docs for The Inspector General. Do you think this is a normal procedure or out of the ordinary?p>

[Califreak]

Wasn’t he some kind of never Trumper?

[Diogenesis]

[SkyPilot]

But one thing to keep in mind is that defense spending is also discretionary spending. So if Trump implements this, it also affects the same defense spending the President Trump just lauded as the only highlight to the omnibus.

[defconw]

Holy Guacamole!

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Hitler youth, or maybe Young pioneers! Especially Hitlerjungen when he does that Clenched Fist salute.