https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfT5NTHU9HQ
Watched it. Mind-boggling.
Not saying I buy all of it, but it makes a very good case for its claims.
So how do we know Trump isn’t yet another feint? According to the movie, the US military is also controlled by those who are rich and evil. Trump has surrounded himself with the military. Also, Trump’s private plane appears near the end of the movie as an example of one of those rich people who work to make sure that they stay richer than the rest of us.
How do we know that Q isn’t just another variation of the “Who really killed JFK? New evidence. The Startling Truth” type of book / movie ?
It’s going to take me a while to absorb and process everything in the video, but it looks like the rich collude to screw the rest of us and then every so often they screw each other. So why is Trump different from Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Clinton, 0vomit, Nixon, .... ?
Thinking about your question.
Those are all very good questions. While the documentary was thought-provoking there were a few things I did not feel were legitimate.
Example: The ‘body switch’ seemed a bit far fetched. If J.D. Tippit’s body was substituted then who the heck was buried in Tippit’s casket?
Example2: Right out of the blue the claim was Tippit was actually shot by G. Gordon Liddy. No build up, just G. Gordon Liddy shot him because he looked like Kennedy and they needed to switch the body because Kennedy was actually shot from the front, not the back? That seemed way out there to me.
Example3: The picture of the person standing outside the Dallas Police department just does not look like a young George H. W. Bush. The only resemblance I can see is their stature.
However, the overall concept made a lot of sense. Just not sure if they have all the players identified correctly or not.
It was definitely worth watching.
There is no way you can know how Trump is different from those you mentioned based on his past. You sure can based on the Deep States and establishment reaction to him winning the presidency though!
Also, if you are not part of the stablish meant, it would be easier for him just to keep everyone asleep and continue on with the plans.
For me it’s a simple question of the others being groomed and owned. I just don’t see that element with President Trump. He owes nobody and surely nobody owns him. Just my own sense, not discounting your question.
"If it happens in politics, it was planned that way."
So ... we have a slight to moderate caveat in the back of our minds--that we all see through the glass darkly--regardless.
NEVERTHELESS, POTUS TRUMP is the only plausible, viable game on the planet even convincingly pretending to seek good and do good. Otherwise, there'd likely be little to no hope of any turn-around before Armageddon short of a miracle of Yehovah greater than the parting of the Red Sea. Possible, doesn't currently appear that's a likely prospect.
Retired Fireman Mark Taylor is also a convincing source of verification of God choosing anointing and using POTUS TRUMP to rout great evils in a list of ways for 8 years. We have a witness in our spirits affirming his authenticity. Other no-name more or less trustworthy sorts also affirm Mark's authenticity.
Could Mark be a stooge--wittingly or unwittingly? Conceivable, not very plausible. The details across 100's of details are far more congruent than some black ops with "voice of God" technology could manufacture, imho.
So, on summary, in conclusion--we believe TRUMP IS THE REAL DEAL and that he HAS significant anointing, protection, guidance from Almighty Lord God Yehovah.
THEREFORE, we affirm him and his operation wholeheartedly and encourage all to PRAISE THE LORD and pass the ammo! Even if we and he fail--it's still the best game in town and certainly deserves to be played out to the end with as much good faith as possible.
ioho (in our humble opinions).
I wondered after I saw the movie if Qanon was some kind of CIA psy ops similar to DebbieWins.com which was a very obscure blog type site with a bunch of really cryptic one liners referencing harassment by the government and mentioning all kinds of political luminaries.
I should probably take much of the movie with a grain of salt. Nothing about the Clinton Corruption that I can recall. When Mena was mentioned it was only in connection with the Bush family.
I’m pretty sure it’s not just the Bush family.
The corruption runs deep on both sides.
That being said, I am not trying to throw shade on Q.
I am hoping somehow the corruption will be rooted out and dealt with.
I finished the video “...Rich Man’s Trick” this afternoon. Of course, I agree we take it w/salt.
1)From my readings, the military corruption was of officers. I think we see who zer0 riffed or who refused his orders and we have a start. From what I’ve read, they target guys in the academies, watch them, test them and if they rise swiftly, they are probably compromised. If they are not compromised, they never (or rarely) rise above Captain. Those who did are the ones around POTUS today.
2) Trump IS different. He made his own way into the ranks of the ultra-rich by actually creating things. He spent years being a notorious playboy. He was one of them. He saw things. I’m sure he was approached. If they had him, we’d never hear all the negatives and he would have been able to run as a donk. He definitely freaks them out.
One clue: he does not have a handler. Reagan had Bush. They still talked smack about him, but then, he also did things like amnesty.
The stories of the JFK assassination show people who are not smart. But so much was at stake, they went for overkill. JFK wasn’t that great a POTUS, he was a womanizer, plus, he was on meds and in braces. His father was dirty. His friends were dirty. They figured they had him contained. Johnson’s ambitions and venality made them comfortable. Kennedy was manipulated into Vietnam partly by his solidarity with a fellow Catholic leader. Kennedy was only going to expose the CIA and the secret societies. As Q keeps telling us: These people are stupid. But, they are also desperate. What if Trump ends war? What if Trump ends easy drug running? What if he manages to end the surveillance state?
The one revelation I got from the video was the answer to why import these Muslims? For those who haven’t watched, the answer is to inject an element of fear into our societies to justify surveillance and curtailment of freedoms.
Thing is, Trump isn’t going to kill them all....there’s too many and no one has the stomach for wholesale executions. We don’t get to do a once and done with this crowd. They may go to ground for a bit, but they’ll plot and meddle as much as possible and will be even more dangerous when hidden.
Confiscate away, but all of them can sell some jewelry, watches, purses, art work, cars and live quite well on the proceeds. I keep reading stories about the glut of multi-million $ luxury properties. They build these real estate portfolios because they could (pre-Trump) deduct the property taxes and then realize the gains when they sold. I’m sure there are ways for them to avoid capital gains or use them against other losses. He is hurting them, but most are going to survive and stay rich. Trump’s stock market benefits them, too.
No easy answers. Stay vigilant. No one human is perfect. This is so vast.
This video should not be taken for Gospel, and in fact has a number of things which have been refuted:
But first, regarding Trump:
For one thing, Trump is obviously rounding up the pedos, arresting MS13, and all the traitorous pukes hate him. So he’s ok to me for now. Trust no one - keep an eye on them all.
For another that Rich Man’s trick is a nifty piece of propaganda with some nuggets of truth, and some departures and glossing over.
It’s true that companies were happy to make products and sell them to anyone. However, Union Bank was not the only bank involved with German Industry. GM had a role too - not just Ford.
The same applies to other countries, and even today. China is the next Germany I sometimes think. We and other countries are providing the dollars that allows China to build up it’s military.
Joe Kennedy was so pro Nazi, that he goofed and ran his mouth and lost his job as Ambassador to England. Don’t forget the big socialist programs of FDR that even the Famed democrat Al Smith took his criticism to the public.
The American Liberty League associated with the Smedley Butler coup was primarily Democrats, but it was bi-partisan. Both Bush and Joseph Kennedy were associated with the group. However, Butler never talked to the leaders - it was some lower level contact. I’ve read that Butler also had socialist leanings-but who knows.
Just for an example, though lets examine just one claim of the modern day era - let’s actually do a little research on the Marvin Bush Security Claim.
He was on the board at Securacom, but had stepped down well before the 9/11 attack. Securacom itself was not in charge of the entire security, and it had also lost the contract well before the incident and was merely completing a project (electrical IIRC).
SO HERE’S THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY:
WTC SECURITY INFORMATION
WTC had its own security head, John O’Neill, who took up the job on August 23rd and died when the towers collapsed.
And at least some of the security was provided by the Port Authority: David Lim, a Port Authority police officer, was stationed at the WTC with his bomb-sniffing dog Sirius. In fact Lim told the 9/11 Commission that the Port Authority police were responsible for the safety of those at the complex SOURCE AT LINK BELOW:
http://911myths.com/html/stratesec.html
EXCERPT FROM ANOTHER SOURCE:
What is the story, then? There is no evidence that Stratesec/Securacom “ran” or “were in charge of” security at the WTC. They were just a contractor, who did have a major role once, but were replaced by another company in 1998.
The only evidence of further contact after that time is a couple of quotes from Barry McDaniel in one article, where he seems to be talking about designing a system that wasn’t yet finished, and nothing as major as managing the security of the complex.
Statement of David Lim to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
March 31, 2003:
I am a Police Officer in the employ of the Port Authority of NY & NJ. I have been such for the greater part of the last 23 years.
On Sept. 11th, 2001, our Police Department suffered the greatest single day loss in Law Enforcement history @ the World Trade Center. 37 Officers from every rank (Superintendent to Police Officer) as well as my partner, explosive detector K-9 Sirius were killed in the attack.
Many would ask what the PAPD was doing in the World Trade Center. A little known fact was that we were always there. Since the Port Authority owned the buildings, we (the Police) were responsible for the public safety therein...
SOURCE AND ADDITIONAL INFO AT LINK BELOW:
http://skepticproject.com/articles/911/twin-towers/page/3/ port autority stratesec other
In addition, individual companies had their own security link below tells how Rescorla helped save many lives:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Rescorla MORGAN STANLY
Additional source of information below:
http://911myths.com/html/stratesec.html
NOW, I AM GOING TO LINK SOME INTERESTING INFO REGARDING DAVID ROCKEFELLER’S FREIND - LARRY SILVERSTEIN, WHO PROFITED FROM THIS TRAGEDY. In other articles, it was pointed out how Rockefeller helped Silverstein to obtain the financing he needed for leasing the WTC:
http://americanfreepress.net/wtc-insurers-pay-out-huge-amounts-to-support-official-9-11-fairytale/
INSURANCE FRAUD?
https://www.darkmoon.me/2013/will-larry-silverstein-ever-be-brought-to-justice-for-911-insurance-fraud-by-dr-kevin-barrett/ SILVERSTEIN MOSSAD? ROTHS?
MY OPINION: Based on having previously seen buildings demolished with controlled demolition, and what I observed and heard on live TV that day, combined with research:
I believe that bombs helped take down those buildings - it was a controlled demolition. Silverstein profited from it, and it conveniently saved him from having to mess with the asbestos issue. The players in the Great Game got their never ending war. Several other benefits from destruction of records, and also advanced sale/shorts of airline stocks etc. which gave some one immediate benefits. The Commission report did not name any names of who was behind those prescient trades.
HUGE GRAINS OF SALT until you have time to research the other side of the stories.
So why is Trump different from Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Clinton, 0vomit, Nixon, .... ?
_______________________________________
When did Carter, Clinton, Obama, Nixon ever expose the CIA, shovel mass quantities of classified information our direction and ask us to study up, inform others, be active, be heard, stick together and fight for what we want? Previous administrations knew about Project Mockingbird and did nothing. When has this kind of red-pilling ever been attempted? In what ways does Trump’s performance and administration strike you as being, “Just like Obama!” or “Just like Clinton(s)?” There’s really no comparison - none. Trump’s campaign promises, which he is fulfilling, sets him apart. Anyone else ever inform the public, “WHo really runs NK?” and then de-fang NK? His impact on the public, other countries....I really can’t spend more time detailing how they are not the same because it would take a LONG TIME.
So how do we know Trump isn’t yet another feint? According to the movie, the US military is also controlled by those who are rich and evil. Trump has surrounded himself with the military. Also, Trump’s private plane appears near the end of the movie as an example of one of those rich people who work to make sure that they stay richer than the rest of us.
How do we know that Q isn’t just another variation of the “Who really killed JFK? New evidence. The Startling Truth” type of book / movie ?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I’ve been gnawing on that question too, generally. I just don’t believe the military is infiltrated to that degree. Perhaps to a degree more than we might believe possible but surely not to the degree described.