Posted on 03/12/2018 10:14:39 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
... discovered beside baby mummy as tests 'reveal they are NOT human'
Could they be aliens? Mystery of three-fingered skeletons as tests 'reveal they’re NOT human'
Bizarre skeletal remains with just three fingers and three toes have been found in Peru alongside a nine-month-old baby mummy.
The mysterious remains have been named Maria by a research team.
Tests reportedly reveal that Maria is humanoid - because she does have 23 chromosomes - but she does have a number of things that mean she is not human.
Professor Konstantin Korotkov, from the Russian National Research University says he has also seen four other male mummies found by colleagues in Peru, which date back as far as 6,500 years.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Zombies! Brains!
Don't be, it was a fun read. :^) And I'm sure I've posted/pinged much worse. [blush]
Elongated heads are seen around the world in ancient royal lines; one would imagine royal persons would be carried and have no need to walk any distance. Was anything found (gold fingernails, etc) that would indicate the specimen was ruling class?
What would be interesting to discern is the shape and weight of the front skull in relation to the posterior - does the face balance the skull on the neck to enable walking? If it can’t, does the specimen have evidence of pretty substantial cranial muscles to support the occipital weight on the neck/cranial vein? How would neck movement be impeded - would the specimen be unable to see their feet or unable to look up?
Took time off from colluding with Trump.
A wood shop teacher from high school.
The authentic skulls were thinner, lighter yet much stronger and had some sorts of mysterious fibers in them.
There were some elements of fine fabric with some. I forget any other symbols or artifacts indicating royalty but the conviction of the researchers was that they were all of a royal class. I forget why all they came to that conclusion.
I don’t recall reading any hypotheses that they had trouble managing their larger heads on their necks.
The picture the debunkers try and present is not near as accurate as they pretend. You might check out some of the links I posted.
True. A lot of people don’t realize the elongated heads are found on virtually every continent. I don’t recall about Australia. And, IIRC, the timelines are more or less the same on all the continents, too. it appears as though whatever dispersal (e.g. from the Levant) occurred around the same time for all the disparate located groups.
Took time off from colluding with Trump.
Skill...skull...
When you're talking about Jerry Rivers, throwing away skill and skull is interchangeable.
Funny!
excerpt
The elongated skulls of Paracas in Peru caused a stir in 2014 when a geneticist that carried out preliminary DNA testing reported that they have mitochondrial DNA “with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far”. Now a second round of DNA testing has been completed and the results are just as controversial – the skulls tested, which date back as far as 2,000 years, were shown to have European and Middle Eastern Origin. These surprising results change the known history about how the Americas were populated...
These may be the dudes who constructed Machu Picchu.
Could these be that people that built Machu Picchu ?
Fascinating evidence. Thanks for the Ping!
Obviously these are “Greys.” And according to some they are up to no good when it comes to homo sapiens.
All the phony aliens resemble the alien prototype shown in the picture. People who fabricate something and call it an alien, have no imagination. They all look the same.
Facts can be difficult to ignore. If they really are facts.
Looks like plaster. How do they get anything done without a thumb?
Half as many as people do--people have 46 chromosomes (23 pairs).
The DNA testing has had many 'false starts,' inconclusive results etc. etc. etc.
They have had a tortured time of it learning to get clean DNA evidence material uncontaminated by handling the skulls etc. etc.
Nevertheless, I think that L.A. Marzullli & associates are on the right trail and coming up with the most plausible conclusions accordingly.
It's a messy scene from many perspectives for many reasons. I do think that Marzulli's conclusions, at their core, are likely to turn out being very accurate.
I think the debunkers are mostly "True anti-believers" and as such seize on this or that flaw in the process; this or that rationalization etc. and avoid the whole picture as well as significant contra-indications to their assumptions and blather.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.