Posted on 03/12/2018 12:17:08 AM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3638382/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
http://qanon.pub
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/#
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3638382/posts?page=2000#2000
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Convenient.
That's my take, and hope. :)
We’ve got too many signs of Trump supporting Q for that to have been necessary.
Mel Brooks reference?
Don’t let one bad apple....
;-)
Cbolt, I did not say *your* practices were *objectionable*.
Let’s see if I can parse this:
I have noticed that Twitter and YT links will show tweets/videos suggestions on the right-hand side that indicate something or other about the original poster or the account linked.
Obviously, in the case of the Twitter link, I was mistaken.
I have no idea what *top tier* indicates in terms of Twitter.
I linked to the @realDonaldTrump account on Inauguration Day.
I have noticed, since then, that links vary as to what else is visible.
The only reason I commented and posted the alternative link was the assumption that others might find, as do I, the mean tweets objectionable.
Nothing personal.
No need to not post. I can certainly simply use the link I prefer.
Again: no need to accommodate anything or anyone. Options are just available choices.
My apologies if whatever I did was in any way inappropriate. I purposely limit my social media exposure due to time, interest and a desire to curate my own input as a personal preference.
YMMV
Agree Iirc any cabinet officer can transfer to another position without a new confirmation. It’s the way the confirmations are written.
Gina knows who/where the rogue clowns are who need to be picked up.
LOL. I think reformedliberal is a very good apple. I was taking advantage of an excuse to stifle my enthusiam/news addiction, which is keeping me from my paying work.
You are probably correct. Also was not appointed by Trump. Who did the original appointment? Clinton? Bush? Poppa Bush. She’s been with the department for awhile.
Money is for the weak. Your country calls.
:)
I believe The Donald appointed her deputy. I don't think any other CIA positions are Presidential appointments. Don't quote me.
That's the natural take of this ...
Twitter users may be used to and fine with seeing the deluge of prog garbage. I'm not ...
As you correctly point out, the link to a discrete tweet includes the following twitter comments, which for Trump tweets, are ALWAYS prog garbage.
-- I have no idea what *top tier* indicates in terms of Twitter. --
"Top tier" was my term, and I mean for that to refer to a twitter page that shows the tweets and re-tweets of a given tweeter. Contrasted with the link I provided, which ws to a single tweet and replies or reactions to that tweet.
-- Nothing personal. --
I emphatically did NOT take it as such, ever. Not for one second. Your preference is a reasonable one.
-- My apologies if whatever I did was in any way inappropriate. --
No apology needed. Expressing preferences is totally fine, and your expression and help with an alternative link was clearly offered in good faith with honorable motive.
I think the link I posted was the one without the flak; it jus had President Trump’s tweets in it.
:)
I don’t think it was meant to be. Check out the prior conversation with math references:
Stylin19A - 3 guys rent a hotel room for an all nite poker game.
Room is 30 bucks and each guy kicks in 10 bucks.
Later in the evening, clerk realizes he gave them a 25 room and gives the bellhop 5 bucks to be returned to the 3 guys.
Bell-hop keeps two bucks and returns 3 bucks. Instead of 10 bucks, each guy as now paid 9 bucks, which is 27 bucks. Bell-hop kept 2 which is 29 bucks total. Where’d the 30th dollar go ?
_____________________________________________________________________
Kalam - Your problem is imaginary. The issue you project is combining addition with subtraction to come up with the discrepancy. Simply, addition to addition, 25 bucks + 3 bucks (1 for each person who paid the original amount) + 2 bucks that the bell-hop kept = the 30 bucks that was the originally paid amount.
I can get to 11 fingers on my hands with the same combination of addition subtraction. First hand - count - 1,2,3,4,5. Second hand - reverse - 10,9,8,7,6. Now add the last digits and “Bingo” 5 + 6 = 11 fingers.
_____________________________________________________________________
stylin19A - you just shot the wind out of my saddle..next you’re probably going to call me when I mix metaphors.
_____________________________________________________________________
Kalam - Yeah, but the example I used is great material when the grand kids are little. So I didn’t just drop a bomb without providing some compensation.
You decide?
never saw a pic. It was in a news report before he won the nomination. After nomination, I could never find the article, like it was scrubbed...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.